For assuming you are a pedophile? Why don’t you kiss the OP’s ass?
Only a few more links and we’ll have a daisy-chain of tossed salad.
I came in here to see a child molester being whipped by strangers… not some freak show!
A-hahahahahahawaitewwwwwwwww
I’m not that flexible. But I am smart enough to realize who the OP of this thread is.
Now piss off.
No doubt you had little difficulty realising that I’d made an error and whose ass you should actually be kissing.
Before folks go too far the other direction, it DOES set at least one ping off on the creep meter when anyone acts as if they don’t understand why children can’t consent to sex, his explanation not withstanding because there is ALWAYS an explanation. I find it difficult to believe he did not know and thus set about to bring about a situaton whereby those who react harshly to pedopliles would be castigated. I don’t buy Ruddymoles innocence on that score.
And some folks have a reason to hate molesters beyond rational arguments. If you have ever had to deal with the damage they leave in thier wake it’s not a difficult thing to understand.
Still… trying to …catch…breath… laughing…too…
Who did that? Certainly not the subject of this OP. What he did was say he wanted to hear others’ reasons, though he knew of reasons.
Why you read something else is more interesting.
Actually one of the reasons GQ can be interesting is that the tight moderation often allows us to have level headed discussions about weird and squicky topics. Not so this topic, it’s too much.
Okay. This is what he said vervbatem.
"I already know of many reasons why it is said that children cannot legitimately consent to having sex, but I’m sure that I’m not aware of some and would like to hear any reasons you can think of, with as thorough of an explanation as you can provide. "
The phrase “why it is said” is ordinarily used when someone disagrees with the premise they are discussing. It’s not a reason to break out the pitchforks and torches but it is enough to cock an eyebrow. Perhaps he is legit and chose his words poorly. We don’t have enough information to make a completely 100 % guess either way at this point.
Why you say “why you read something else is more interesting” gives me a whiff of torch as well. What if I said your 100% off the bat is interesting?
So he didn’t say that he didn’t understand why children can’t consent to sex then, did he? You’re exaggerating. You are not quite leaping to conclusions but you certainly have your knees bent.
I still don’t see how it’s exaggerating. That IS how “why it is said” is generally used. Also anyone who starts a loaded argument and doesn’t expect some shots fired is an (substitute whatever word for ill informed or unthinking you want here). Sure he strokes the egos of the forum with “you guys are so smart compared with the drooling reprobates elsewhere” later but it’s no reason not to have some question as to his original impulse in posting. Perhaps it doesn’t usually happen out loud but if that is what you mean by knees bent then sure, but I would say more of a look in the direction of the conclusion to see if it’s an easy walk there.
What, you’ve never seen people get pitted who haven’t even registered here? Pfft. To break the record, you’re gonna have to Pit somebody who hasn’t even DONE anything yet.
whoops. Look! Zombies!!!
Wtf?
I know. A whole LOT of old posts are suddenly reappearing.
Is it just old posts?
Grandma?
Nah. We’ve had at least one poster pitted for his or her name before they submitted their first post.
Please note that this man was welcoming his daughter to marry Eugene Victor Tooms, a character so creepy that twenty years later he’s still remembered by his full name. :eek:
And if I seem unable to separate an actor from a character he played, I’m not alone. Martha Stewart broke up with Anthony Hopkins after seeing Silence of the Lambs: http://www.hollywood.com/news/celebrities/3600693/martha-stewart-stopped-dating-anthony-hopkins-because-of-hannibal
What a bitch.
Wt-everloving-fuck!?
The creepiest thing is that he isn’t even banned. shudder
Wow. Very glad that that person is not a moderator anymore. A fucking Jerk warning in the Pit? If she wasn’t still technically a member, I’d have a few choice words for her.