Rumsfeld to Troops: Deal with it

Title stolen from Keith Olbermann

Troops put tough questions to Rumsfeld

G-D, this pisses me off. Why can’t we properly support the troops YOU put in there. I know we’ve been through reasons here and over at GD (not being prepared, not enough troops, being greeted with flowers, etc.) but it just infuriates me to get “support our troops” shoved down our throats by the very government officials who won’t.

I’ve been in the Army for 16 years. That’s from Bush to Clinton to Bush. There was never any thought that every vehicle needed to be armored. From the lowest Private to the highest General, no one ever thought that every HUMMV needed to have a full armor package. Most of my Army career we used the CUCV, you might know it as the Chevy S10. No armor there. To think that Rumsfeld or anyone else should have somehow know what no one else predicted is a little ridiculous. Armored HUMMVs are being produced at the highest rate that can be managed at this time. You try to predict what might happen but in the end " You go to war with the Army you have," and then adjust to the situation.

Bush really needs to put the kibosh on Rumsfield’s public speaking. He has a bad habit of inserting his foot into his mouth:

:shakes head:

Support the troops? Yeah, right.

Tell me again why the Pubs aren’t fools for voting for this gang?

His lies and incompetence put them there for no good reason while genuine threats to the Repulblic are allowed to fester, and then he had the bloody nerve to tell them “tough titties!” and fly home to a warm bed.

And really, how bad does it have to get for an enlisted man actually says something like that to the Secretary of Defense? The soldier’s remark could not have been made lightly.

Gobear, 5que composed his thread faster then I did, because it didn’t exist when I clicked new thread. It was also closed before I could request to close it.

Just FYI

Armor? Fuck that. Why don’t we just unmanned vehicles and not send any troops? I wanna do my fightin’ from behind a joystick and a 60" plasma monitor inside an NBC hardened pillbox . . . on Antigua.

C’mon guys. There are limits to the level of safety that can be guaranteed to soldiers - both technological and budgetary. If you gotta have absolute assurance that every troop has to be supremely protected from injury, you might as well not have a military.

If the fucking guys need armor get them their fucking armor. Where the hell did that 87 billion go anyway?

It’s being spent on armor. The factory is working at max capacity and has been for some time. It’s easy enough to find that information.

Spc. Wilson did not ask for “absolute assurance that every troop has to be supremely protected from injury.” He asked 'Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to uparmor our vehicles?" and asserted that “We do not have proper armored vehicles to carry with us north.” Seems like a reasonable inquiry, given the circumstances.

I’m not sure you quite understand how satisfied the left might be with that proposition.

Well shit, UncleBeer, considering how much we are spending on unmanned aircraft, it looks like our military is headed in just that direction.

So remind me again why our soldiers are inadequately equipped?

This reminds me of that dumbass movie “Enemy at the Gates.” Remember the opening scene?

I am sure Stalin said pretty much the same thing to his troops. “What, now you are expecting rifles?”

But apparently infinity difficult to cite.

Need I point out, Maeglin, that that same Red Army beat the Wehrmacht back to Berlin, and occupied Eastern Europe for close to fifty years?

Good soldiers and sailors, and airmen and Marines, bitch constantly about the amount of supplies they have. They then go out and make do with what they have.

In the case of the American military, that often achieves quite impressive results.

Yeah the front page of CNN.com is very hard to find. I’m not going to bother, do it yourself.

So the moral of the story is, Mr. Moto, that great success on a shoestring is possible if human life is cheap and in nearly unlimited supply?

If this were the case, how do you explain our paltry troop deployment in Iraq? The Red Army threw millions of meatshields against the Wehrmacht.

Great, now every kid who has read Ender’s Game and plays America’s Army will start brewing conspiracy theories.

When I heard this story this morning, two things popped into mind:

  1. How bad does moral have to be for the soldiers to be openly asking the brass such questions?

  2. Someone’s life has just become a world of shit.

Well, I just checked and am not seeing that information (although there are references to “doing things as fast as we can” in the story about Rumsfeld).

I do understand, though, why you might get your back up a little. After all, it is not as if a precedent exists on this message board for asking folks to back up claims that they make.

…looks at CNN front page…

No, can’t see it…