One link will suffice to demonstrate that you are not following the science, and it is posted to the edification of others and the demonstration of your hot air properties.
You will need a link for that, but at this time I conclude that you are just a chicken shit coward as you are demonstrating that you are incapable of finding proper links that support your sorry points.
I will have to assume that your feeble brain is just smart enough to know that your sources of information regarding this issue are crappy.
Right, Huffington Post is of course terrible, but some website called “Skeptical Science” is holy scripture.
Anyway, you are the one showing your ignorance here. You are not aware of the many scientists saying its too late to do anything. You are denying the science they do. You are a denier.
Coming with more evidence of moronic powers is really not helpful Mr. Hot Air Rand.
The links show that published scientific papers are supporting their say so’s. But here you only demonstrated that your ignorance is a willful thing and not just a coincidence.
And I’ll leave others to read the links and see if the scientists really said that it is too late to do anything, the pessimism is about seeing governments doing anything now and to the level that is needed, a completely different thing than preaching doomsday.
Everyone can see the difference, except morons. And on top of that a moronic and clear contradiction, if the problem is serious why your insistence that there is no problem at all?
More stupidity.
The Grist writer is not talking about doom but that it is too late to prevent several bad effects in the future, the point has been that it is moronic to talk about doomsday.
Again with the discredited Huff po.
And the BBC link is about James Lovelock, that even on this thread was denounced by me as an alarmist that is dismissed by the sources I look at for reliable Climate Change information.
BTW, Many who are here also know that I mentioned before that scientists expect that the temperature will increase, the main point is that curtailing CO2 and other global warming gases now will prevent even worse temperature increases, so your point of me ignoring what the scientists said is false.
It is known by the majority of researchers already, the controversy now is if 2 degrees will be safe or good and if we will be able to reach and maintain that limit. And many do agree that 4 or more degrees are possible by 2100** if nothing is done**.
This would be great, do you think you can get the conservative members of this board to go along with that?
Or is it your belief that conservatives never attack the poster for being “partisan?” Do you really think anti-Republican threads are treated differently than anti-Obama threads?
You should at least realize that there was a ‘tone’ to your thread. The whole thing comes across as a big “neener neener your team sucks.” What were you expecting? It was complete partisan bullshit.
So what did you expect? You were both overly aggressive, and wrong at the same time. You’re implied intent was that “Obama loyalists” were abandoning ship, and that proves Obama sucks, and that means Republicans rule.
But you were wrong, so what was left to be *reasonably *debated?
What’s worse is that you got called out and then sulked. You thought you had a big win but didn’t.
Did you need someone to show you new Obama supporters? Does that balance out people jumping ship?
Welcome to the SDMB, were you unfamiliar with this behavior? Do you think it only happens towards conservatives?
That’s right, you could have worded it better, and you probably knew that before hand. Also, if you know there will be attacks, you should be better prepared. It was little more than an anti-Obama rant, so of course people are going to look at the “harsh criticisms” and they are going to look at the level of “support” each person had for Obama.
Your “debate” hinged on the criticisms being both “harsh” and from “ex-Obama supporters.” So if neither was true, what are you left with.
Bullshit.
Again, more bullshit. You are not a saint. And that’s fine, you don’t need to be a saint no one wants you to be a saint, nor expects you to be a saint. Just to act like a martyr every time you get called on your bullshit.
Except the problem with what you wrote is that you assume all of the things you write are without fault and thus never deserving of poo. It’s not that you write something “conservative” it’s that you write something that shits on liberalism or socialism. Do you see the difference?
When you shit on someone else’s beliefs or idiology, they are going to throw poo back. It’s the law of the jungle.
But more importantly, there are a lot of shitty posters on this board. You have then on your side, we have then on our side. Unless you think poo is only thrown by liberals.
So at the very least, you should be aware that if you start a thread about, “Obama sucks because he has the most fiscally irresponsible federal policies in U.S. history” the first thing people are going to do is look at what other president had fiscally irresponsible federal policies. Then they’re going to look at what you said about those presidents. In the end, they’ll probably find that you showed support for a president with even worse fiscal policies.
So what does that say about you? You liked person x when he ran a deficit, you hate person y when he runs a deficit. As **Bricker **would say, are you concerned about the actions or the actor?
And this is the point that the accusation of “partisan” gets brandied about. Why are you concerned about action x now (borrowing money to pay for a stimulus), when previously action x was a great idea (borrowing money to pay for two wars).
Well, as far as I can tell, the conservatives on this board are treated with exactly the same disdain as the liberals.
The real problem now is that you’re on record as being against personal attacks and accusations of being partisan. So I hope for your sake your careful in the next debate on fiscal policy.