Save my baby. . .kill theirs?
On last night’s local news there was a story about a baby who has a disease that is destroying its heart. The baby has one or two months to live unless it gets a heart transplant. The baby’s father said in an interview that he prays to God that a heart will become available before his baby dies.
This leads me to three questions:
-
Does the father not see that in asking God to provide a heart for his baby he is asking God to take the life of someone else’s baby?
-
If the father believes God can save his baby, why doesn’t he pray for healing, instead of the death of another family’s baby?
-
If there really is a god, why do babies get life-threatening diseases in the first place?
Here are my own answers to those questions, which will no doubt differ from many of yours.
- Of course he does, but any parent who loves his child, offered the choice between the death of an unknown parent’s child and his own, will opt for the death of the unknown. A neighbor’s or a sibling’s baby might complicate the issue, but I think the choice would likely be the same. Simple human nature, and I couldn’t blame him for it.
-
No matter what the core belief is about healing, relatively few people, seeing their own child wasting, away would choose prayer only. They would also try every possible medical treatment. My own, admittedly cynical viewpoint is that, deep down, most people don’t believe in miraculous healing, at least not without exhausting every medical possibility first. Then, if a cure is effected, no matter what the doctors did, God gets the credit. The claim that the recovery was a “miracle” apparently mitigates the lack of faith. God loves being praised whether he deserves it or not.
-
This one is the primary reason that I ceased accepting God long ago. If there really is a god who is omnipotent, then nothing happens without his direction or at least his consent. That children have diseases like diabetes, spina bifida, cystic fibrosis and cancer, to me puts the lie to the idea that “God is Love.”
I anticipate some especially heated arguments on that point, but I’ll wait until they are advanced before dealing with them. This is the reason this thread is begun in the Pit.
I’m not trolling here. I am expressing an opinion in the form of a rant, because, even though I know where it comes from, it pisses me off to hear people say “I pray to God that my baby will survive” (at the obvious cost of someone else’s, which loss I will bear stoically). I don’t blame them for it, mind you. But it rankles me because of the idea that a loving god could allow this horror in the first place and then, at his caprice, either allow the first baby to die or murder another because the first baby’s parents prayed harder.
I wish people would just admit that what happens is random and unaffected by any supernatural power. The only way disasters like that poor baby’s heart disease are acceptable to my mind is if there is NO god. Randomness is acceptable. Some kind of “plan” that includes children’s suffering is not. If there is a god he’s certainly not love itself. If he’s omnipotent, he’s also at least as much evil as good. That’s my opinion, and I’m stuck with it.