I’ve always found reading about reported supernatural events and those ‘Mysteries of the Unexplained’ type things fun and interesting.
Part of that is learning what the mundane and plausible explanation behind each incident actually is. However I personally find the aggressive and unpleasant tone of many of the sceptics off-putting. What could, and should, be a calm discussion of the likely explanation seems instead to be a chance to be as nasty as possible. It tends to be 90% snark, 10% content.
Take this entry on RationalWiki on the Travis Walton case for example: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Travis_Walton
“on the off chance that some guy dressed like the construction worker in the Village People will wander close to their spaceship.”
Is that really necessary?
I realise I’m probably alone on this but its something I’ve been thinking about.