In a question of “To Allow/To Prohibit,” I tend to lean towards “allow.” Allowing people their liberties leads to a sense of ease, which I believe contributes towards a learning environment for people who want to learn. The contrary perhaps provides a narrow walkway for less motivated people to follow but hinders the rest of us. Indeed, I have a friend who decided to work extra hard this year (his junior year) so he can graduate and go to college a year early to escape the rigorous and anachronistic system which is our school corporation.
I never said that my use of a cell phone wasn’t distracting to me. I just said that it wasn’t distracting to my peers, and that assertion holds. As for my phone being more important than what the instructor has to say, perhaps it is not but it is occasionaly far more interesting. When we spend fifteen minutes recaping mitosis because Jane doesn’t get it, I generally find something to do with my time other than listen. I don’t need to hear the same information twenty times. Two or three is plenty. The students themselves rarely say anything of intellectual importance due to:
- The fact that one doesn’t talk when the teacher is talking.
- The fact that when the teacher calls upon one to talk, it is generally to answer a question about which the class should have learned from the reading the night before.
- The fact that in the relatively small time that students spend talking, the ratio of mundanity to intellectual brilliance which comes from their mouths is usually steeply in favor of banality.
As for the instructor feeling disrespected, all I can do is quote
Sometimes, I feel disrespected too. The rigorous structure of the school rules is not very mindful of the feelings of the students. As long as I keep up my studies and do well, my disrespecting you does not affect your job performance and you get your teacher’s paycheck.
Why am I at school, you ask? Why, to learn. However, the government requires that I be there for eight hours. I would say that only two or three of those hours are actually spent imparting new information into our heads. The other five or six are spent reviewing and answering questions. To fill in that time, I read books or text.
I hate to sound like an arrogant ass, but judging by my GPA and SAT score, the divinations which your oracle made for my future at Fatso Burger are as true as the predictions of an easy takeover in Iraq. Assuming that I find work somewhere other than the service sector, your analogy seems to be faulty. I once again bring up the example of Dopers using the board while at work. They obviously have some down time in which they are being paid while doing something other than the work they have alotted to them. Somehow, I haven’t seen any threads about workers losing their jobs due to message board use. It is the same situation with cell phones.
I still see no good reason for a blanket ban on phones, other than “It’s easier to ban them than regulate their use.”
