2014
1993
2014
1993
Oh, I won’t say that there aren’t people who are bitter sexist misogynistic fucks straight out the gate, without any help. I mean, somebody pushed it to the depths of the toilet where it now resides, and it would have to be guys like that. But also, as I previous mentioned and which you ignored because of reasons only you know, the group doubtlessly existed prior to taking on the “Incel” label. The dude posted on bodybuilding forums, you said? It’s my understanding that there’s a huge focus on appearance in that subculture too.
And as for Japan, aside from the rather large cultural difference that Inceldom seems to have sprouted from english language communities, it appears that in Japan they’re getting hikikomoris, who have internalized their anxieties to the point of withdrawing from society, rather than blaming other people and hating society. Which seems significantly more mature, if you ask me.
Your knowledge of Japanese culture seems to be entirely made up in your own head. Your knowledge of Japanese society seems even worse. “Without any problems?” And you think that if there were, they’d be attributable to celibacy? Not to mention things like demographics, availability of firearms, and such.
If you were honestly curious, you’d shut up, read the thread, be ashamed, and go away. But you won’t, will you? Everyone knows by now that “Involuntarily celibate” is simply the stupid version of “Enthusiastically awful.” Seriously, when you decide science has decreed no one wants to have sex with you, think about another scientific theory: evolution. When the planet doesn’t want you around anymore, take the hint.
Yeah, they took 5782 speed daters and charted the women’s height requirements that the women themselves stated (min and max) and did competitor analyses on how many men would have to compete for a woman at each height. That seems perfectly reasonable to me. I did speed dating a few times and it was fun. Do you think it could have been studied a better way?
This other height study showing women were happiest when the man was 8" taller than them used a sample of 52,677 people:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886913000020
But I can’t find a full text version for free and I don’t care enough to pay to read that methodology. In my experience most of the girls that were easiest to date did tend to be around 6-8" shorter than me. I’ve dated girls with closer heights but it’s never been so easy as when I’ve been that much taller myself.
I think that’s why they call it “The Blackpill.” They see it that way as well. That this is all reduceable to evolutionary biology. Most of those studies are evolutionary biology at their heart. Eg. Women want tall muscular men because once tall muscular men were needed to fight off wild beasts.
Unattractive men are unable to have sex with women.
Within a few generations, unattractive people have been removed from the gene pool.
Is there a…downside to this that I’m somehow missing?
I didn’t know anyone could own a word. Unless maybe a copyright or trademark. Nonetheless, female incels like Alana still exist as posted. So her legacy still exists online:
“Easiest to date”?
Out of genuine curiosity, what the fuck? How is it hard to date a woman who you can look in the eye?
I mean, yes, I get that there’s a vague societal notion in a couple the man should be taller than the woman. Vague. But (like all the other stuff in these studies), that’s just a trend thing, and there are numerous actualized counterexamples. Being a somewhat short man is not a death knell, no matter how much Incels want something other themselves that they can blame for their problems.
Getting rid of all the short people is a bonus. They got little hands and little eyes, they walk around telling great big lies.
They got no reason to live.
All the short men.
Presumably we’re going to slaughter all the tall women too, just to balance things out.
I mean there was the most instant attraction from the girl. Her playing with her hair, batting her lashes, rocking back and forth, making innuendo. Have you never noticed any types of trends about the girls who like you most?
I don’t think anecdotes outweigh statistics. One of the girls who loved me most was around my height and I once had a girl much taller than me “fall in love with me” (told everyone this) but I never ended up dating her for other reasons.
Anecdotes and outliers don’t change or invalidate the data.
Again, even if true, so? What’s next?
Nah, tall women are an evolutionary advance.. They can get the premium products off the top shelves at the grocery store.
Do you practice deliberately missing points or does it just come natural?
That was my question in the OP exactly. If I knew the answer, I wouldn’t have asked.
Man, I love these threads that have the one schlemiel is them that go so fast you can’t keep up.
I’ve banged all sizes of gorgeous chicks. The tall ones were great, the medium size were great, and the short ones were especially great. I guess you could call me “Chad!” And in the morning, they made breakfast!
And I’m talking fresh fruit, homemade biscuits, and caviar omelettes. None of that cold cereal shit.
I don’t ‘prowl’.
The three women I’ve dated were all shorter than me, but that’s probably just because I’m moderately tall, at 6’1" - that’s seven inches taller than the american female average height.
Are you, perhaps, somewhat tall too? Maybe most of the females that reciprocated your attentions were shorter than you because most of the females you met were shorter than you.
They sure as fuck invalidate the Incel worldview, though. The Incel worldview is that the deck is so stacked against them that they have no chance. Even one single counterexample blows their beliefs to shreds.
They pretend this is false, and keep citing data that manifestly, explicity, and comletely doesn’t support their conclusions of doom, because a bitter inferiority complex doesn’t work if you’re not doomed.