The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.
Apparently, one must learn to read between the lines.
All Dopers are liars.
If a doper falls in a forest…err forget it…next!
the next post will be false.
the previous post was true.
This post is not a post.
If this thread can teach us anything, it is that this thread can teach us nothing.
This post is red. This is the second second in the red post. In this sentence, a main character, Sid, and an antagonist, Bob, will be introduced. In this sentence, a terrible tradgedy will befall Bob. Sid is mentioned again in the fifth sentence. Bob and Sid will frolic in the tall grass in the next paragraph. This is the last sentence of the first paragraph of the red post.
This sentence starts a second paragraph in the red post. Bob and Sid, as mentioned at the end of the first paragraph, frolic in the tall grass. In the third sentence of this paragraph, Bob dies a mysterious and painful death after frolicing in the tall grass of the second sentence. This sentence has no purpose. This sentence explains that Sid, who was mentioned again in the fifth sentence, doesn’t know that Bob died a mysterious, and yes, painful death in the third sentence. There are 12 paragraphs in this post, each with no more than two sentences each. This sentence serves to further aggrivate the reader. This sentence amplifies the purpose of the previous sentence. This sentence, which doesn’t really end at all, reiterates the spirit of the first sentence of the post, as it insists that this post is red . . .
If this thread is selected for “thread spotting” will it exist?
Bonus question: Will any of Gilligan’s or Montfort’s posts be true? Why or why not?
I was never here.
If you believe that this post does exists and then find that it doesn’t exist, then you have not lost much of anything. If you believe that this post exists and then find that it does, indeed, exist, then you have have gained something beyond measure. However, if you don’t believe that this post exists and then find that it does exist, then you have lost greatly.
Therefore, it is in you best interest to believe that this post exists…and, for the hell of it, that I am your Lord and Ruler. Bow knave!
Beaker does not exist.
(sorry oh lord and master!)
Hmmm, a deity for five minutes and already my existence is being denied. :mad:
Now, where did I put that bag of brimstone?
What is the sound of one hand posting?
Since the OP doesn’t exist, it cannot have been posted by someone who exists.
There is no Euty!
But since Euty doesn’t exist who is the expert cunnulingist praised by partners who would have been Euty’s if he had existed?
Veb
This has been discussed in this Thread.
C’est ne pas un poste.
post haste?
post toasties?
post hypnotic?
and if you write/read/say “post” long enough, it ceases to have meaning
If none of these posts (including this post) exist, then is it part of a set of nonexistant posts that doesn’t exist?