I would like to know what you meant by this comment in [thread=293049]this thread[/thread]? I have never advocated pedophilia in this or any thread. If you have any evidence to the contrary, please post it here. Otherwise what you are doing is slander, and pretty fucking despicable, a new low even for someone who has advocated genocide and wished death on U.S. troops.
Everything he’s listed as saying here sounds pretty stupid, but do we need to start one of these “Build-up-to-ban” things, or can we just tear apart stupid arguments and let the people with marginal ideas hang around,dispite vehement disagreement?
I guess they might be considered unorthodox in some corners, but in my neck of the woods they’re community standards and recognized as such by law.
I dunno if mistaken identity is the explanation for sevastopol’s outragous slander (a quick review confirms that he was a non-participant in the only recent thread on that subject I’ve opined in – though I suppose he might have lurked,) and I have a hard time believing that anyone would consider my twoposts there would likely be seen by anyone as a defense of paedophilia.
Either way, sev ought to lay off the crack pipe. Or take a pill. Whichever works.
No, no problem. I think opening the thread was entirely legitimate. I just saw, in Milkman Dan’s comments, inklings that it was about to turn into something else.
We don’t have Redundant Claus in our country, but as I understand it he’s the chap in the red suit responsible for Boxing Day in countries of the Commonwealth.
Makes a claim that there were ‘zionist considerations’ for the war in Iraq.
Which is, of course, code for “them Zionists helped get us into this mess!”
Or more sinsterly, “Them Zionists are to blame for this mess!”
And then he refuses to give a single cite, in GD none the less!
And not only that, has the fucking nerve to imply that I am somehow conducting ‘bad practices’ by asking for a cite.
Oh, and, to the OP, don’t mean to hijack your thread… but as long as that asshole is being pitted, I figured he’s fair game, right? Besides, something tells me he doesn’t have enough honor to apologize to you.
I guess I’ll buy the mistaken identity hypothesis. But I’m still pissed.
I mean suppose I had written Larry Mudd’s posts. Or suppose he had written mine in the linked thread. While LM’s posts may raise debatable points, no rational person could construe them as even close to promoting pedophilia. (I know, I know, Sevastopol is not a member of the set of rational persons.) Now there are a lot of guests here who cannot search. Not to mention all the unregistered lurkers currently lurking. They’re going to have the impression that Larry whoever posted something like “I like to have sex with small children and I think society should encourage this practice.” Mistaken identity or not, it’s still slander.
And while I’m here I’ll apologize to the SDMB in general for instigating in the linked thread. Those new “Poster X banned” threads in ATMB seem so pit-like I forgot where I was.
Wow. I’ve never noticed Sevastopol before on the board. After reading some of the links provided in this thread, I’m shocked that this person is still posting and hasn’t been banned yet.
It takes a lot to get banned from the SDMB. Too much IMO. Somebody like Sevastopol shouldn’t be allowed to get up to 800+ posts. Aldeberan has thousands of posts and still hasn’t been banned. It’s very frustrating to read the hate filled rants of these idiots for such a long time before something is done about them.
Whoa, now. As far as I know, Aldeberan has never slandered anyone. Also While I have a lot of disagreements with Alde, and while his posts about “US’ers” can be way over the top, I’ve never seen quite the vitriol I’ve seen from Sevastopol, who is in a class by himself.