It seems that regulating this particular behavior is counterproductive. Mandating that she takes steps to ensure that her personal behavior has limited effect on her neighbors makes more sense: soundproofing, keeping her floors and bed in good repair, moving to a first floor flat, if she was above someone, keeping her bed away from the wall, sound reducing curtains over the windows to be drawn before engaging in loud activities of any sort, and so on. Instead of fixing the problem, they’re focusing on a person, which seems likely to create a backlash effect.
Ha; I like the mouseover about “aberrant behavior”.
For one thing, what’s been forbidden is not her making noise during sex, but her making so much noise during sex that it disturbs the neighbors.
For another thing, where’d you get the idea that forbidding excessive noisemaking in the context of what’s supposed to be one’s private life would necessarily be considered “absurd” in the US? News stories abound concerning US residents who’ve been slapped with fines or hauled into court for making too much noise in even weirder circumstances:
Neighbors of Sex Club in Hollywood Try to Shut it Down Due to Noise and Parking Problems
And just for laughs, though it’s not from the US, here’s another noisy-sex story:
German Court Asks Couple to Make Love to Test Noise Levels After Complaints From Neighbors
I think you could be on to a winner. A sort of XXX Wife Swap thing. 
I could well be wrong, but I doubt whether a couple this unconcerned with the feelings of their neighbours would have had just this one fault.
Next up on the BBC: 1820 House, Year Three. Join our participants as they re-create what life was like in a brothel exactly like the one Fanny Hill worked in. Tonights episode: Maintaining good relations with the neighbours.
Kimstu, thank you for providing examples of officious noise suppression in the US. They were entertaining, but you didn’t disprove what I said. Those examples are rather absurd.
That would be like installing curtains. If she’s too dense to figure it out then I think she’s an exhibitionist looking for the thrill of an audience.
Well, let that be a lesson to you.
According to other coverage, they recorded her.
Me, I think they should change the building codes to mandate noise suppression. I would call them the “Fran Drescher codes”, because hearing her scream in sexual extasy is one of my worst nightmares.
Oh, I see. I thought that when you said the UK court decision “would” be absurd “in my country”, you meant that Americans in general would be opposed to “officious noise suppression” for excessive noise from people’s private activities, which I think is inaccurate. ISTM that most Americans, including most of the ones in this thread, don’t consider it at all absurd to maintain that people who are just persistently too goddamn loud should be officially told to keep it down, irrespective of what it is they’re being too loud about.
However, if you just meant that you personally consider that kind of noise regulation absurd, then you’re certainly right that I haven’t disproved that.
What is the consequence of violating an ASBO? Can she then be prosecuted criminally?
Kimstu, I didn’t mean that such rulings wouldn’t happen here; some of them probably would. I didn’t just mean that I think they’re absurd, either. I mean they’re absurd enough to be mocked on late night talk shows, or places like News of The Weird and The Daily Show.
Being publicly mocked, of course, has no legal bearing.
In my town, cops carry sound meters and tape recorders in their patrol cars. If the cop records X decibels for X seconds, then you get a ticket for violating the city noise ordinance.