Or what, jackass? What’s going to happen? Please tell us about the right-wing wet dream you envision for the future that involves Arpaio.
Or run off and hide again.
He means the mid-terms. It looks bad for “the liberals” because a bunch of drooling chucklefucks are in good position to take over the Senate. And Magellan is stupid enough to think that’s a good thing.
Oh, you cannot just leave it like that – spill!
Cities are usually in counties, not “surrounded by” them. I’ve never seen or lived in a city in the U.S. the residents of which did not get to vote in the county elections for the county they also lived in. I would be interested to see an example of such. Can you provide one?
My examples are: Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon; Chicago, Cook County, Illinois; Dallas, Dallas County, Texas; San Francisco, San Francisco County, California, and all the cities and towns in Los Angeles County, California.
[QUOTE=Czarcasm]
Or what, jackass? What’s going to happen? Please tell us about the right-wing wet dream you envision for the future that involves Arpaio.
Or run off and hide again.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe you two dolts can get together so you have two synapses firing. If you’re successful, you may come to realize that there is an election not even a week away.
:rolleyes: Unbelievable.
What the hell were you thinking?!? That kinda crazy can rub off on you yanno! 
Regards,
-Bouncer-
It’s common in states in the East, especially Virginia. Virginia has many cities that are not part of any county. Another that I know is that the city of Baltimore is not part of Baltimore County, Maryland.
Virginia is the only state where it’s common. There are 41 “independent cities” in the United States and 38 of them are there.
Sure, there’s lots in VA (35+ including the state capitol (Richmond, VA)). I’ve lived in a couple (Norfolk, Virginia Beach and Richmond), and city residents don’t vote in county elections (and vice versa).
cite for you:
Regards,
-Bouncer-
Well I think we can consider that question asked and answered. 
Also: JINX on both of you and you each owe me a coke.
Regards,
-Bouncer-
Well, you could, but I wouldn’t recommend it.
That too.
Is Arpaio up for re-election this year?
See post #22. The last sentence is particularly germane.
You truly are a stupid one. And I have proof.
Lobohan was able to figure out what you were unable to. 
OUCH!
Oh, I knew you were talking about the Senate midterms, I’m just curious about Arpaio – on what cycle and for what term is his office? I could Wiki it, but I figured you as a fan would know off the top of your head.
What do you mean, “while you can”? How are you envisioning that the upcoming midterm elections could possibly change Judge Snow’s ruling on disciplinary action for the 81-year-old Sheriff Arpaio?
AFAICT, this ruling (and whatever “glee” may be experienced on account of it) will stand no matter what happens at the polls Tuesday. Arpaio is appealing the ruling, of course, but he doesn’t seem to have a very good track record in persuading the courts to endorse his racist policies.
His term runs concurrent to the President’s. His last electoral campaign was in 2012 (although he did successfully fend off a recall in 2013 – stupid Maricopa Countians :mad:).
How terribly depressing that you feel that way; so what you’re saying is that we Zonis can only enjoy Arizona until OMIGODTHERE’SMEXICANSEVERYWHERE!!! AND IT’S DOOMSDAY!!
jeez
Odd that I even have to explain this, but okay. Come next Wednesday, the issue of the Senate will dwarf every minor issue, like this one. And if the results turn out as most people expect, libs will be crying in their beer.