In your worldview, pool trying to urinate in private, and Zimmerman confronting a stranger with hostility are comparable events? Did you take your gun with you hoping to have an argument?
I’m also curious whether **Hurricane **and his ilk would be capable of acknowledging this in their hearts. But I don’t think their responses in the thread would answer this one way or the other. They might be happy a nigger was killed but pretend otherwise to keep up their “I am not a racist” charade. Or, they might understand that the manslaughter was a tragedy but fear that to admit it would undermine their case.
What we can agree on is that they take great pride in being ruled by their amygdalae and reptilian brains. While liberals are dawdling to make assessments of guilt or innocence, Hurricane and his ilk will have bravely shot all the possible “bad guys” dead, leaving God to sort them out.
“Can be,” certainly. “Nigga” admittedly exists in a liminal space of derivation; I would argue that it has clearly moved past simply being a variant of “nigger.”
But still a variant, and still very context dependent. They’re close enough that for me, among the whitest of whites, the chances that that divergence will be recognized by the listener are so small as to be indistinguishable. Of course it could just be the delivery, I’m well known for being so dry its hard to tell humor from seriousness.
I wonder if Shodan thinks she qualifies to be called by the n-word? Also, I wonder if he’s not too cowardly to actually say whether he thinks so or not?
I read all your cites, actually. But I take it you are, in fact, afraid to tell us if you feel Omar qualifies as the N word? Just a yes or no would suffice.
Is this the entirety of what you’re basing your accusation of incest upon?
Based on what you have presented, there’s more sourcing to the allegations that a pizza parlor in DC is actually a secret child sex ring run by the Clintons.
It’s Shodan’s new SOP - make a claim that people didn’t read his cites (regardless of whether they did or not), add a hefty serving of snide insinuation that they therefore haven’t rebutted his points while carefully avoiding actually saying that to avoid having to defend his position, and then ignore all material follow-up questions. It’s his new method of “who, me?” trolling.
He used to be much more circumspect about his approach but he’s definitely creeping over the line more and more these days.
This is a guy who thinks that “Hispanic” is a race, as per his first post in this thread saying that Zimmerman was “half Hispanic/half white”. You can’t fix stupid.
I agree that Zimmerman should be held responsible for Martin’s death because he stalked and killed an unarmed individual who was not committing aggression against person or property.
That said, there is no evidence that he acted the way he did because he is racist or harbored racist feelings towards Martin or “black” people in general. That part has been fabricated out of whole cloth. Even if Zimmerman was shown to be a racist before and after the murder, there is no way to say if that is what caused him to kill Martin.
I don’t understand the racist angle in the case to be so important to the anti-Zimmermans. It will only provoke knee-jerk reactions and an inability to discuss the case.
Hey, can someone post something accusing Shodan of being a goat fucker, so we can all follow him around the message board noting that he’s an accused goat fucker?
Did you take your gun with you hoping to have an argument?