“Asking them on a date twice a day for a year, even if politely, is harrassment.”
True, but only assuming the askee made it clear *in no uncertain terms that the asker should stop asking because (s)he wasn’t interested in social interaction with the person, yes. Otherwise, no, not so much harassment v. stupidity or wilful ignorance on both parts.
*Knowing people as I do, chances are that the person (regardless of gender) is engaging in and endless game of noncomittal beating around the bush, diversionary tactics, excuses for whatever reasons, which I find inexplicable.
I covered that. [ol][li]After you have been introduced, or [*]when she wants you to.[/ol]I am not being ironic here - this is the actual rule.[/li]
Regards,
Shodan
OK. The choice in user name is beginning to make a lot of sense now.
Good to see someone has the courage to address the most pressing issue.
Now, let’s approach this yet another way. (Maybe from the rear, this time?)
Why does a man’s desire to get his wick wet need to take precedence over a woman’s, nay, a PERSON’s right to not have to suffer unwelcome imposition when she’s just trying to get from point A to point B?
Why should anyone be made to step over a bunch of dicks being thrown in her way?
When he’s been properly introduced to her in a general social setting and has some particular reason to think that she might welcome an approach from him; or
When she is participating in some activity (e.g., drinking in a hookup bar, posting a profile on an online dating site) that indicates she’s open to being approached by strangers in general. If someone chooses to take the chance of going outside the social conventions and hitting on a stranger who’s minding her own business, he is NOT entitled to resent it if she ignores or rebuffs him. If that happens, he should briefly apologize and LEAVE HER ALONE.
ETA: Or in other words, what Shodan said (and that’s something you don’t hear me say very often).
It is acceptable to approach a person whom you have social interest in if that person is engaging in a socializing activity. Party, bar, book club, chatting during class breaks, etc. (And yes, “approach” does not mean “harrass”.) Walking down the street is not a social activity.
FWIW, my wife’s experience has been that blacks mostly ignore her but that Latinos tend to look her up and down. (It’s possible that they’re saying things too, but she doesn’t understand them because they’re in Spanish :).)
I don’t think it’s about “color”. It’s a class and culture thing.
Anecodotally, some women have told me that they like wearing earphones in public – whether they’re listening to music or not – because it makes catcallers much less aggressive, somehow. I suppose the catcallers somehow think a woman listening to music is “excused” from having to reply to the catcalls, because she can’t hear it.
It was probably odd for the people you greeted. When I moved out of NY to a more Midwestern setting, it was certainly weird to me at first how all these strangers kept greeting me. I adjusted, and I do the same when I’m in more bucolic settings now.
It’s not even just in Manhattan – I grew up in a small beach town that happens to be in the five boroughs and I only really said hello to my friends and neighbors who I recognized. I never greeted, nor was greeted by, strangers who happen to be walking down the street. It’s just not a New York thing to do.
Again, what’s wrong with simply treating people as they want to be treated? Lots of women have spoken up, for years, about not wanting to be talked to, bothered, and treated differently from a man when they are out in public. So unless you know a specific woman who told you that is ok, then you treat everyone as if they don’t want to be bothered. This isn’t that difficult
Ultimately, harassment isn’t about what women wear. It’s about male entitlement. I have Muslim female friends that wear full hijab. They get harassed by men. Comments about “pretty eyes” are frequent. Their eyes are the only part of their bodies visible on the streets.
Even in other places, ISTM that it’s mainly people that you meet head on coming in the other direction, and make incidental eye contact with. But if someone is sitting on the side of the street and a stranger passes by they don’t call out hello or the like, as many did in this case.
[FWIW, I think there are two reasons for the distinction between big cities and small towns WRT this. 1) because being in the same small town as someone else is a sort-of connection to a far greater extent than being from the same big city. And 2) because walkin down a typical big city street you pass so many people that it’s impractical to greet them all.]
NO, she is wearing jeans and tee shirt walking down a public street in the middle of the day. Seriously. How do you interpret that as “wearing a bacon suit around a pack of dogs asking to be sniffed and or licked/chewed on?”
If some men can not refrain from behaving like a pack of dogs around women they find attractive, the onus is on them to limit their scope in society until they can control themselves, not the other way around.
Who are you addressing with this smug condenscending tone? Is there someone here who has insisted that it’s difficult to treat women the same as men - or that there’s something wrong with doing so - such that you need to inform that it’s not difficult?
The only question being discussed here is what level of harassment this woman has suffered, in the video being shown. That’s all it is. It isn’t that difficult.
This needs to be emphasized. This is the correct behavior when addressing strangers. Anyone who attempts to gain your attention wants something from you. A salesman wants to sell you something. A beggar wants you to give them money. And a horny guy wants to have sex with you.
If there’s eye contact and the other person’s body language isn’t closed off, then saying ‘Hi’ is appropriate. Otherwise say nothing.
The issue in the video isn’t that the guys are saying ‘Hi’. It’s that they’re saying it when she is clearly not interested. It’s inappropriate to approach her in that situation.
It seems to me that there are folks (a few) in this thread who are blaming the woman for what she chose to wear, or for taking offense from any of the catcalls, among other things.