Got it. Thanks.
Does anyone know how a sexual advance will be received before it happens? When you make whatever your patented move is do you stop and ask consent first? If someone makes an advance and is rebuffed and they stop there is no crime. It may be the tort of sexual harassment.
The Jill Harth case might be a crime but I am not familiar with the law in Florida and especially not familiar with Florida caselaw which is not easily googlable. As I understand it the case was never investigated as a crime and only went forward as a lawsuit.
I have no doubt that Trump at least skirted the line up to assault and is a horrible person. If people want to think of him as a rapist then fine as long as he doesn’t get elected.
The lawsuit happened in 1997. It’s not like it wasn’t brought up until the SoL ran out. As far as I know she made no attempt to go after him any where but in civil court.
Even if there was no statute of limitations I’m pretty sure these statements would not be admissible in any trial.
Harth actually did file a sexual harassment suit, which alleged attempted rape, but withdrew the suit as a condition of the $100,000 settlement she said Trump paid her.
Exactly. Let me emphasize this. The Democrats should not imitate Trump. Trump has been spewing out barrels of lying propaganda against both Clintons and calling for at least Hilary’s arrest. The Democrats should not copy that behavior. They should stick to facts and official findings - because that’s what makes Democrats different from Republicans. It’s a good difference and one that needs to be preserved. Trump is offering plenty of rope. No need to invent a new string.
If this sinks Trump, it does so with the usual perversity of politics. We know his personality. Probably nobody on earth aware of him will be truly surprised he said this. Or a hundred other things exactly like this. He has in fact said a hundred things in the same ballpark, not just about women but about every group that isn’t his own family. This is a nothing in the larger picture of what we know about Trump. Yet this might be the one thing that sticks when a hundred similar or worse things slide. Nobody has ever figured out why some things get headline news and others just like them are local stories. Stuff just happens. This may be his Dukakis tank moment. Or tomorrow’s debate may produce a new outrage that wipes this out of public memory. Nobody knows.
Good summary.
When I was a kid, I used to wonder–and be outraged by–how so many people were such obvious Bad Guys, even to the extent of admitting in public that they continually broke the law, and were allowed to get away with it. “People talk about these mafia bosses as though everyone knows they’re in the mafia,” I thought, “why don’t the police just go and arrest them?” Rock stars and rap stars repeatedly, openly, even defiantly referenced their own, ongoing use of illegal drugs–why don’t the police march right down to their houses and arrest them?
The Real World just doesn’t work that way.
Yes I said it was brought up in civil court. What I was trying to say is that this is not a case of someone coming forward with allegations after the statute of limitations ran out. Her allegations came out in time for a criminal investigation but she chose to sue. I don’t know why. Maybe advice of counsel.
Yes, but we were asked about it’s relevance now, which is why I brought up the SoL.
True but even without that I don’t think it would be allowed in court. There would be arguments both ways for sure.
Are you saying that the DA would probably not be willing to charge Trump with a criminal offense?
I was doubling back to the OP saying that this recording would not be admissible at trial at a hypothetical Jill Harth case or some other hypothetical victim.
He managed to get away with fraud, bribery, violating the Cuban embargo, tax evasion, and inciting violence. I agree that he should be arrested, and you or I would be arrested for these actions. But unfortunately he seems unstoppable, and I doubt he will face legal consequences for this scandal either.
Oh, OK. I didn’t get that from your post, but it makes sense now.
That Hugh Mongus guy on youtube is deep legal shit apparently if he ever runs for president anytime soon.
Just Asking Questions?
There should be a term for that. :rolleyes:
You could test this, go to a mall, or a public park and walk up to women, kiss them and grab their genitals.
I doubt that you have the budget to buy lawyers but I am betting it will answer you question on if it is illegal or not.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html?mtrref=gephardtdaily.com
Let me get on the record, again, that I fully expect Donald Trump to be in handcuffs within 3 years. There are too many crimes, too many pissed off people, too many powerful politicians who no longer can stand the man, his goose is literally and effectively cooked.
I’ll even go further out in a limb and say it’s going to be a RICO indictment: There are too many organizations and too many crimes to prosecute effectively, both operationally (with multiple jurisdictions) and the cost.
Rico is likely the only answer. Otherwise, the Department of Justice, the state of New York, the State of Florida, the FEC, the IRS, and multiple other jurisdictions have to spend their time and money prosecuting Donald Trump in any of his three organizations.
Again, in my admittedly not legal opinion
Take your pick. The SoL is expired on some of the sexual assaults though.
Or in a few weeks, he is going to be president elect, in which case those same powerful people will line up at the trough. Business is business.
Declan
Wow I didn’t realize that’s what Trump did! Your link didn’t mention it. I’ll go off right now and find the story.
In the mean time I’ll just let you know I’m an SVU detective who has been investigating sex crimes for the last six years. I’m always willing to learn more so I’ll look forward to your next posts.