Shut up, yhou stupid fucking chimp!

Look, how many times must you be reminded: Reality is irrelevant. Its liberal bias makes it unworthy of attention. All you have to do is decide what OUGHT TO BE, and firmly insist that it IS, and it WILL BE.

Consider that there was more than one way Hussein could have been deposed by our influence, that there were ways to arrange it that did not involve a full-scale invasion, and that we jumped the shark the day the Admin fired General Garner and replaced him with Paul Bremer. Please read the OP in this thread, and please read all of it, and please read it very carefully.

Generally speaking, yes.

Please do not confuse our people with our government.

Even in a republic, the people do not always get the government they deserve; for time and chance happeneth to them all.

Where would lying about successful results fit into that good people scheme? As far as I can tell, having poor results, and claiming that they’re really good results is a pretty reliable indicator that someone is not good people.
Take the president’s statement about progress in the ‘surge’ today:

Presumably, Bush is referring to the brigades described in this administration briefing

Yet the Secretary of Defense said yesterday :

So the Iraqi’s have missed the first solid benchmark we gave them, yet the president is claiming they’ve met it.
This does not bode well for either the surge, or the concept that the president is good people.

The third cartoon here (you’ll have to click to get to it, since I can’t link directly to the cartoon) shows that not everyone believes Shrub’s latest tale.

House passes nasty letter which tells Shrub just how angry they are.

Now, if they can all agree to pass something which will get us out of this clusterfuck.

I could accept that on the first go round, but I have no sympathy for people who voted for Bush the second time round, by which time they knew exactly what he and his crew were about. The majority of the people got the government they wanted.

The recent drop in support for the administration and the drop in support for the war is a result of the USA losing American troops in a unwinnable war. The drop in support is not because Americans who voted for Bush the second time round suddenly saw the light and realized that destroying a country and causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of its people is very, very wrong.

Does that make the majority of Americans bad people? That’s a tough one to address, however, what is clear is that the majority of Americans knowingly supported a very bad thing. At what point does knowingly supporting a very bad thing make one a bad person? Those who voted for Bush the second time round should reflect on this.

Respectfully, I couldn’t disagree with you more. Irrespective of Kurdistan, two news reports from 2006 prior to the EU’s meeting in Ankara say Turkey had actually backslid fairly universally:

It’s estimated Turkey might finally conform to EU standards by 2015; if in that intervening time had there not been action by the US and Britain to depose Saddam, there probably would have been a Kurdish rebellion.

What’s worse, if anybody else had deposed Saddam, that power or coalition would certainly hold little of the comparative clout that the US has with Turkey. So the stage would be set for a brawl between the EU and the Turks, possibly ending with a destabilization and/or breakup of the EU itself.

All these possibilities are too risky for any world power to permit. The only reasonable choice was to depose and dispose of Saddam and his lineage.

I did. It’s total ridiculous Palast-ine bullshit, one of your hundreds of OPs literally eroding GD into a wasteland of propaganda.

I’m not, you idiot. Whom do you think are manning the checkpoints? Which people are carrying out the humanitarian, civil, reconstruction, training and legal outreach? Our people. We are a good people. Learn to fucking read, and while you’re at it, look around you at the individuals who make up your home country, you twisted self-loathing fuck.

Some of you seem to forget Saddam’s state was a police state; news and information with any objectivity was quashed and totally distorted. There had been countless Shiite and Kurdish rebellions under Saddam’s aegis, yet we know of only a few notable ones. Our government put us into a well-known flashpot. (Christ, so many of our esteemed posters have been saying that since before the invasion.) The powers that be installed the best Coalition of the best people in the world to watch over one of the worst places in history.

The next morning, Assad is in Tehran holding scheduled talks over Iraq. Effectively, Syria is meeting separately with Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Khamenei over two days of negotiations. Call it a shotgun wedding, but I think they’re starting to get the message.

Dynamite stuff. Is it local? And how much for an ounce? Clean and seedless please.

All of that is evidence that we are bad people, given how they are being carried out - or not, as the case may be. The simple fact that we are there at all makes us “bad people”. At the very least, all those who support and prosecute our actions against Iraq are “bad people”.

Everyone knows that it was a police state; it’s just that it was better run, more prosperous, safer and for most people more free than the hellhole we’ve made Iraq into.

Oh, nonsense. We are not the best people in the world, and the Coalition is simply a rather pathetic mask for American imperialism. And Iraq wasn’t one of the worst places in history until after we took over, if then.

I have a nasty suspicion most of the people who jumped on, and cling to, the 'We’re saving those barbarians’ bandwagon, are the ones who paid little attention to international relations or history previously and so have willingly soaked up all the bull they were fed by Shrub & Co. because they knew no better. And continue to be ignorant of what has really gone on on the rest of the planet.

You don’t seem to understand. According to our own anti-indigenous history the US is not known for saving “barbarians” at all. Apparently only evangelicals are interested in that. Why are you talking to evangelicals in the first place?!

I’m really not sure how we got from “police state” to “barbarians,” though. :eek: Are you trying to tell me that without a crippling police state, Iraqis are barbarians?

:rolleyes: You’ll have to do better than that, Cid. Contradiction is not refutation, not even if you spice it with an asinine pun. Everything in Palast’s book, especially that particular chapter of it, is backed up with research, documentation, and interviews with inside sources. What exactly did he report that is not factual? Please be specific and provide cites of your own. That, in answer to your earlier question, is what we do in GD. It is also something you should be learning to do in college. It’s called developing critical thinking skills; I could send you some literature on it.

Yes it is.

Recall, I said the Coalition is made of the best people in the world. Americans are a good people. Don’t conflate these in your zeal to insult the non-US components of the Coalition.

See my EU post above. Europe has a nice stake in this too. Not to mention Australia and South Korea.

You have a distorted view of reality. Whole encyclopedias have been filled with the violent history surrounding the junction of the Tigris and Euphrates. Any imperial adventures into what the west knows as Iraq have been met with fierce resistance that ultimately devolved into the kind of class-based retribution that might’ve made Hammurabi blush.

I’m starting to get a picture of what goes on inside your head. You think our Coalition allies are lapdogs and you think Americans are possibly the worst people in the world. Gotcha. I’ve got to wonder whether there’s any place you dislike more than America. I’m going to guess you haven’t traveled much.

Non-US Forces in Iraq - February 2007


1	United Kingdom  7200
2	South Korea 	~2,300 
3	Australia 	~850 
4	Poland  	900
5	Romania 	865
6	Denmark 	515
7	El Salvador 	380
8	Georgia 	300
9	Azerbaijan 	150
10	Bulgaria 	~150 
11	Latvia 	 	136
12	Albania 	120
13	Czech Republic 	100
14	Mongolia 	100
15	Lithuania 	~50 
16	Armenia 	46
17	BosniaHerzegov 	37
18	Estonia 	34
19	Macedonia 	33
20	Kazakhstan 	29
21	Moldova* 	12
TOTAL 	 		~14,200

Remember how you shat on Stratfor somewhere upthread? Well, I’m going to have to shit on “Palast the ballast” for almost identical reasons. In that thread people were trying to be gentle to you: you don’t know what you’re talking about. That’s why GD is so fucking tiresome these days.

And if you were my real-life friend, I’d kick you in the fucking balls for all the links to your own threads that you post as cites.

:smiley: You mean I’ve got to back to school just to be able to talk to you? Jesus, but aren’t you a haughty little dick?

Any views on the Syria-Iran kumbaya and/or yesterday’s Tehran bombing, or are you going to keep waving that Associate’s Degree at me?

Iranian officials said the explosives used in that attack were manufactured in the United States.

No, it isn’t!

America is the driving force and by far the most powerful and numerous member of the “coalition”; the others don’t matter except to pretend this is something other than an American invasion, and I doubt it fools anyone outside of America. And do you have any reason to believe Americans are “good people” beyond repeating it over and over ? “Good people” don’t invade other countries and kill tens of thousands in an unprovoked war. That is the act of evil people, not good ones.

You’re an American, aren’t you? Are you evil?