You must like my cheese. You’re always in my tail wind, sniffing. That’s some sick stalking, btw.
That’s because I don’t find Skald to be especially misogynistic, and I find Shagnasty to be especially misogynistic.
Well aren’t you the clever little monkey. Boy how you can pull the wool over everyone’s eyes, making brilliant little jokes that only the other mean girls club will catch on to! Give yourself another pat on the back, morgenstern.
We, at the mean girl’s club, have decided you need a new pair of panties. The ones you have are too knotted.
Yeah. A lot of people genuinely liked umkay, too.
Good to know, Morgenstern; please feel free to tell me anything else you think I might give a shit about.
Let’s see. Senility?
That tail wind doesn’t smell like cheese so much as stale smoke, pee and vodka. I thought I was following bigfoot. Sorry.
Since we still can’t post images here, please imagine me holding up a card with a “9” on it.
I am so glad you have a hobby that’s so fulfilling.
Never got a stalker vibe from madsircool. Get a lotta stalker vibe from Morgenstern over the years.
Hi Morgenstern! Nice to meet you!
Yup. With the history of this message board, you’ll have to excuse me if a poster being well-liked by Dopers doesn’t exactly give them legitimacy in my book.
Thank you. You don’t really look like bigfoot from the back.
And people will have to forgive me if I don’t side with people who are still holding a 12 year old post against someone and apparently have it bookmarked. :rolleyes:
The threads mainly being discussed are from the last month or so. Keep up.
The older stuff is found in two seconds on google using the search terms “skald rape”. It’s not that hard. Isn’t it the done thing around here to provide cites when you make assertions? Or have we devolved to “BE GONE HATERS I LIKE SKALD OK!!!1”? Because that’s all I’m hearing from you and morons like BigT.
Okay, I just read the Skald thread in question, and I don’t see anything particularly creepy about it. Nothing that would justify expectopatronum’s response, anyway.
In the IMHO thread about hypotheticals a couple of weeks ago, Penfeather provided a handy list of creepy threads started by Skald in the last few years.
Of course, he was immediately accused of “stalking” by another member of the Skald Fan Club.
Eh, your father is Eric Trump and your mother a shaved blonde Ewok with fake tits.
Please tell me where I told you to be gone.
Oh, wow. I’m really glad you provided that link. It totally clarifies things.
Y’all are CRAZY.
This might be a good example: a character was raped as a child, and mayyybe there’s a salacious attitude here. It establishes the character as a victim.
Not remotely salacious: there’s an attempted rape that someone is saved from, as a way to establish that the savior is a Good Guy. The question is, is discrimination a worse sin than saving someone from rape is a virtue?
What a goddamned stretch. A racist character makes a shitty joke about how black people rape. It establishes her as racist and therefore a Bad Guy. The question is, would you favor a hyper-competent person who’s deeply terrible over someone less competent but really good?
I mean, maybe salacious? There’s a guy who’s really competent and also a rapist. The question is, would you favor a hyper-competent person who’s deeply terrible over someone less competent but really good?
Not even rape. A promise of sex extracted under duress but not collected on under duress. The question is, is a promise made under duress enforceable?
Again no rape. The question is, would you assist someone in engaging in degrading work for money?
Oh ferchrissake. Rape is mentioned here as an example of the worst thing a person can do. This is not even remotely salacious.
Okay, dude. The point here is, which is worse: the murder of a bad guy, or the torture of a good guy?
There’s no pattern here of getting rocks off to description of rape. Now, yeah, there are a lot of sex crimes mentioned–but no more than you’ll find in the average modern thriller, wherein, much like Skald’s threads, sex crimes are used as shorthand for “very bad person,” and rescuing someone from sex crimes is shorthand for “good person.”
Personally I find such shorthands lazy, which is part of why so many modern mystery thriller novels irritate me: yet another murdering pedophile ain’t a particularly interesting character.
But the pattern y’all are seeing here? It’s bullshit, and embarrassing for y’all.
I still don’t have a dog in this fight, but you’re acting like a Republican justifying trump here. You just did more to prove the oppositions case than they have. That’s weird shit no matter how you look at it.
snerk