This doesn’t pertain to cross-eyed women, per se, but it might inform the discussion a wee bit:
I believe it was Edgar Allan Poe, in one of his works (maybe it was “Ligeia” or “Eleanora - A Fable”?) who wrote, “There is no exquisite beauty without some strangeness of proportion.” (He was describing a woman’s facial features.)
I’m a hetero guy, and I’ve always found this to be true. Both the celebrity* females and the “real-life” girls that I’ve always found most attractive, have been somewhat “atypically” beautiful, somehow.
*Some examples from my personal celeb crushes list:
-Natalie Portman
-Alexandra Maria Lara
-Rachel Weisz
-Angelina Jolie
Now, it might be protested that all of these women are “conventionally” gorgeous. That may be true to some extent, I guess, but if you stop and think about it, quite a few of them have some very odd facial proportions. Jolie’s eyes, for example, are rather oddly shaped, too far apart, and her lips are too big, like comically big. Weisz’ face is rather squat, and her eyebrows too heavy.
When I think of women like Gwyneth Paltrow, on the other hand, it’s almost like she’s TOO beautiful (i.e., not strange-looking enough). I find her to be downright boring. Not hot, because there’s nothing interesting going on with her face.
So yeah, I can see this. I think there’s something to it.