This is the hooker paid for by Elliot Spitzer. From Smoking Gun.
She’s hot but I don’t know if she’s 5 thousand dollars a throw hot. She looks better in some photos than others. Her facial expressions look sexy in a couple of the pics. Her boobs look fake, though. For that much dough, I think I’d want real boobs.
Diogenes, anything you have ever said in the past that has even mildly annoyed me is absolutely forgiven for digging this up. I swear to God the only detail of this entire stupid story that I have cared about is, “Man, I really wonder what a 5k/hour hooker looks like.”
My question having been answered, I can now safely stop reading any and all Spitzer-related stories in the news.
Not to pick nits, but I thought it was reported that she is a mere $1K/hr hooker. Or I may have misheard…
The local paper said $4,300 per hour.
5k? That’s for a month, right? I mean, she’s hot, but for 5k she had better come with a 52" flat panel hi-def 1080 plasma screen.
Hmm…She’s pretty good looking but instead I think masturbating to the pictures and then buying a new $5000 HDTV is a better choice.
Edit: Great minds think alike, don’t they NurseCarmen? Then again, I’m not sure I want my porn in HD.
I’ve seen better looking women on Craig’s List erotic listings at about $200 per hour… I mean my friend has.
I don’t know if she’s worth 5 grand but I definitely think she’s sexy. It helps that she actually looks somewhat bohemian and quirky instead of the ritzy-looking fur-coat-and-$19,000-dress woman that I had a mental picture of when I heard about all of this.
But if you had the $$ to spend on a sure thing vs a strip club (which would be out of the question if you are in the public eye - right?), wouldnt you? I’m sure the price included “discreetness” (to an extent - no guarantees).
Besides - if you had money, would you really want to go hunt down a “basement bargain”? I’m sure it’s an ego/power-thing.
I missed the K in the OP…thought it was $5 per hour. I was afraid to look. Next thing I knew, I was looking for change between the cushions of the couch.
It may have less to do with the hottness of the hooker and more to do with the fact that the client looks like this.
For me, the value/hotness curve is asymptotic and levels off somewhere around $300. People just don’t get more attractive than that.
Why isn’t she naked in those pics? WTF??
Ah, that’s just a bad picture of him. Even with his balding hair, he still has fundamentally handsome features, and he also exudes the kind of confidence and power that tends to exert a more powerful draw on women more than looks anyway.
Is the bang worth the bucks?
Not in this case.
The rate may be due to performance issues, rather than easthetics - some of the reports suggest that “#9” was a bit of a freakazoid, sex-wise, even by the standards of the professionals. The higher rate may well be a combination of hazard/nuisance pay.
She’s cute, but not worth the cash. I see girls as pretty as she is any day I’m out. Still, pretty girl!
I would like to do something about those eyebrows, though. They’re so bad, they’re distracting.
That and $5000 you mean 
I’m pretty sure none of us can afford that.
A while back I heard someone talking on the radio about escort services. What you are paying for is what they call a “girl friend experience”. They treat you like they love you. Add to that some high risk activity and you get high price tag. Since Spitzer is rich the price wouldn’t mean much to him.
