All this lady-on-lady slut shaming is hawt, hawt, hawt!
What does that say about me? Probably nothing good 
Bnbbmikb? 
I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
It’s more of a magazine, actually.
If it’s about women, shouldn’t it be a periodical?
Maybe a news segment. Fox news CT already has some stock boob footage to accompany the slutfest: Fox CT's Women's Day Coverage Is Mostly Just A Single Shot Of Breasts (VIDEO) | HuffPost Entertainment
Try the veal, he’ll be here all week. You slutty sluts.
She is not worth her own thread, this was enough wasted time - but I thought this should be brought to attention since PlainJain likes to call names and participate in pile-ons.
This is an example of the kind of garbage I write when I get loaded. After writing the quote below, to then make fun of myself for what I had done, sent a private message to my friend (SWB) telling her that I needed to quit drinking and this a good example of why - wasting time building someone up who is the kind of person that likes to put people down. Someone who is a phoney.
Anyways, here’s what I wrote because I was drunk. Did not want to admit at the time for the reason that the particular thread about giving up booze. What a load of crap!
I had previously hassled Ms. Jain for her bogus pics, did so when she was attempting to pile-on one of my friends. From the context of her posts in that particular thread, felt that she needed to be called out. You may like ms. Plain but she is a phoney.
Take a look at these posts below…
PlainJain, one of too many here who get off on pile-ons, had her picture added to the gallery back in December of the previous yr, as can be seen here
Not only was the picture up for over four months, and strangely enough, she never cked the gallery to see the pic. Does that make sense to anyone? In fact, Jain wasn’t the one to discover her pic was fake, it was someone who discovered our message board, joined the board, exclusively to address the copyrighted pic.
Not only that, but the picture of the attractive blonde woman who was not PlainJain, was pointing a camera pointed at a mirror, with the caption that ms. Plain wrote supported the pic, mentioning that the pic was taken during her "photography phase.
Also, does it make sense that if someone simply and by accident sent the wrong pic, and upon discovering the mistake, wouldn’t then go ahead and send the original pic - the one that they intended?
Interesting strategy to make everyone stop talking about your sock puppetry. Let us know how that works out for you.
I take it then that the dope is no longer hysterical about socks. I consider that a plus, even if the subject of the largess is an idiot.
That’s nice and all, lone cashew, and probably worthy of its own Pit thread, but it doesn’t belong here.
You’re unhinged, Sam.
Yawn, old drama. Cashew’s still a goatfelcher. (Remember when that used to be a thing? I remember when you couldn’t go two threads in the pit without someone being accused of felching.)
Here’s what I said earlier:
Of course, if neither party desire an abortion, the woman is put out (whether the man supports the child or not). Especially in the US, which has pretty lacklustre maternity leave compared to other countries and afaik no scheme for subsidising childcare. If both desire an abortion, the woman is more put out, since she has to undergo a fairly serious medical procedure.
However, if the woman wants an abortion and the man doesn’t, there’s essentially nothing the man can do about it. Fair play in that case. If the man desires the woman undergo an abortion and she doesn’t, he has to support the child financially for the next eighteen years. Sure, the actual child rearing is more of a feat, but voluntarily acceded to. Not so in the man’s case.
I also feel that the language used mirrors that of opponents of abortion in toto - either have sex with people you can trust or keep an aspirin between your legs. There should be contingencies available for marginal cases, both for men and women.
Sooo, is Cashew arguing that he’s still loaded?
Also, this is funny:
Why? Because several female Dopers have PM’ed me since this thread started, telling me about how over the years, they’ve received tons of creepy as fuck messages from our nutty friend, with him even offering to fly to come date them. Maybe lay off the PMing chicks, bud.
Sure. Loaded with bullshit.
Five bullets short of a revolver?
What?! I never got a single creepy message from him. I feel totally left out. Why, am I not pretty?
If he hasn’t PM’ed you with an offer to fly to you to take you out to dinner, the only logical conclusion is that you’re a fugly slut bitch. Sorry to have to be the one to break it to ya.