Some of you can be really fucking irritating (thread shitters)

Can you explain the difference between these two? It looks like we’re both doing essentially the same thing.

Except, of course, I do it with style.

This is why I don’t post in the pit.
mmm

Je-sus! I make one comment to Munch about agreeing with the opacity of a thread title and OP and Grapefruit goes apeshit and takes Inner Stickler along for the ride. I could be all conciliatory and apologize for wadding up their panties, but fuck it. I’ve had a bad day and they are fuckwits anyway.

<insert language and characterizations now prohibited in the Pit towards both of them>

Fuck up you dirty fucking threadshitter

lobs a sandball at silenus too

Wait I’m confused…
What does a dead rapper have to do with a large citrus fruit with a bitter yellow rind?

You see, when a rapper loves a fruit very much…

“The pitcher winds up…here’s the pitch…he swings…and it’s…gone!” :stuck_out_tongue:

Here I sit
Broken-hearted
Opened the thread
And Vinyl only threadfarted.

I read this with two snaps and a twirl after it.

I’m one of the people you think was threadshitting, but I can safely tell you that you’re wrong, and you can cram it up your fucking ass.

I have no idea who L’il Sebastion is, nor did I have any idea that Parks And Recreation was a show. It was only after going back and reading thru the thread because of your moronic rant here that I figured out it was a TV show.

You have no sense of humor, are a jerk and deserve all the remarks people are making telling you so.

Sandy cunt, sandy cunt
What is irritating you
Sandy cunt, saaaandy cunt
It’s not your faaault

This is why I don’t start threads in the pit.

Rapper Sebastian. ‘Little’ brother to some guy named Timbalands. Wouldn’t that make him ‘Li’l Sebastian’? Oddly enough, I’ve heard of Sebastian the rapper, but not some character from an unfunny sitcom. Odd because I like sitcoms (funny ones) and dislike rap.

Threadshitter!

Coz you don’t have sand in your cunt?

This does not excuse the OP. The problem is clearly with the thread title.

No they didn’t. It’s an explanation only if you are familiar with the show - I’m not.

Because it’s not my job and I don’t want to. You are coming off like a crazy person. Calm the fuck down.

Check out my swinging dick.

Pics or GTFO

(this is a tattoo, but probably still NSFW)

Oh lulzy :smiley:

I intentionally made the thread title vague, yet intriquing, in ignorance of a rule to have dull titles in Cafe Society. It seems to have worked. Except for the first idiot who posted about not enough P&R threads and then complained when there was one, the rest of the post were funny, and probably more numerous than the typical P&R thread. Possibly someone not watching the show would give it a shot. But I suppose the Cafe Society snobs can’t be bothered to look at a thread that may not be about the type of thing they are interested in.

oOoOohh!! I am also so embarassed by a spelling mistake in the title too! That’s never happened before!

See I just didn’t realize the threads were meant only for those who were interested in something they haven’t read yet. I feel foolish for assuming anybody might be curious about something they weren’t familiar with. And I feel shame for causing the hardship endured by those who were forced to read the thread because they didn’t know what it was about.

Yes, assume it is a spoiler even though you don’t know. That would be the exact opposite of shitting.

(actually after starting the thread I realized that might be a spoiler, but it’s actually the opening of the show, there’s a cliffhanger at the end, and I wasn’t as concerned about spoilage as I was about the poor dopers who might have wasted a mouse click to see what the thread was about).

Grapefruit - Thanks for the support, but most of the posts were funny. It was my thread, and I wasn’t offended. Now that I know the rule, I won’t even bother to start a thread in CS again.

Everyone else: I’ll step up my threadshitting efforts. I don’t know what it takes to get pitted around here, but this thread hardly qualifies.