When I first emigrated to New York, I arrived as a hitchhiker. I had a valid driver’s license issued by the state of New Mexico. It took me quite a while to get settled up here, but eventually I was indoors, enrolled as a college student at SUNY / Old Westbury, making some friends on campus, doing well with my courses… and still toting around a New Mexico driver’s license because a) I didn’t have a car and b) Dept of Motor Vehicles had a really dismal reputation, like it was a very unfriendly red tape authoritarian machine where you didn’t want to spend a day any more often than you had to.
I want to talk about a couple of 7-11 stores that were somewhat close to campus. Handful of miles in each direction. There is no alcohol sold on campus. Keep in mind that I’m not up here with a car.
The one most nearby at that time would not accept an out-of-state ID as proof of age for the buying of beer. “Has to be a New York driver’s license”. I now have more of an understanding for her policy if that was indeed her policy. Because of the lower likelihood that you’d recognize a fake ID if it were from another state if you were the clerk making the call.
At the time I was just being insistent that reciprocity meant that could not possibly be what the law says. Like I’m a law student or something, but I mean that was my understanding, that the states were bound to honor certain reciprocal extensions of authority and certification issued by each other, and driver’s licenses were among those areas of reciprocity.
But meanwhile the 7-11 farther down the road was initially accepting my New Mexico driver’s license as proof of age, so I’d walk the extra mile and a half to buy a six-pack of beer. Then my license expired. And although they might have missed it for a few purchases, eventually someone noticed and said “This ID can’t be accepted for proof of age, it’s expired”. But to me that doesn’t make sense.
“This license is for me to be legally able to drive. It’s expired, so nobody knows if I’m currently licensed to drive or regarded as qualified to do so or forbidden from ever doing it again. But it also says I was born on this date like it says here. And it’s still an official document, it says I was licensed to drive between this issuing date and this expiration date, and if I got charged with driving without a license back then but the trial is today, this document, although expired, officially says I’m not guilty, I was licensed as of that date. Well, it’s also true that I’m still a person born on this date of birth. So… defend why you can’t accept it as proof of what we’re trying to prove here!”
Older me has to admit that the same notion of reciprocity, like in my earlier argument, sort of applies to the notion of what it means for a license to be expired.
We also have to talk about how accepting date of birth on an expired driver’s license as a legitimate proof of age carves out an unusual exception. Each bureaucracy ‘wants’ to run things. If you’re being formal about how a bunch of rule-bound bureaucracies measure reciprocity in things, exceptions are harder to advocate for. The pressure to be efficient results in a tendency to generalize, and to make policy according to generalization, ignoring exceptions and then designating them pathologies and failures.