well everyone knows the naked female body is art-y and beautiful, but the
naked male body is just funny looking.
I don’t think it is “absolutely” beautiful. Even genuinely gorgeous people can look less than attractive in the wrong lighting/situation, and not everyone is equally attractive.
Not to burst any bubbles, but not all women are attractive, and just because you can find a man willing to fuck you doesn’t mean you’re attractive either, it just proves that men aren’t that picky.
The voice of experience?
Not necessarily. I will say that my criteria for judging a woman to be “beautiful” is a lot stricter than my criteria for saying “I’d have sex with her.” Functionally speaking while there are obvious deviations, most female’s sex organs get the job done regardless of how attractive the woman is–it may be harder to get aroused with a less attractive woman. This is all assuming the woman is within some modicum of “normal” weight (ie not clinically obese.) I imagine having sex with a woman who is extremely heavy might create logistical problems and limit positions.
And meanwhile I believe eleanorigby’s post, and Jackmanii’s, could bear repeating but do not *need * repeating, as they stand by themselves.
Wow aren’t you a snotty little fuck.
I guess I COULD have added that the people who are supporting the OP all seem to have the same uptight, shameful associations of nudity with sex, which isn’t very enlightened. They all sound like Petunia Dursley to me.
Hell, I’ll repeat it again. 
Which of the following does not belong: violence, child abuse, drug dealing, nudity?
Oh cmon! Drug dealing, of course! We all need the weed.
“Bore” as in to bore others?
Or “bore” as in to bore a hole through your dense skull that the issue is not whether or not nudity is “bad” but that a parent has a right to take a child to family venue and not be exposed to what is, within the standard of the society, generally not considered family fare?
Or do do you mean “boor” as in the boors who can only think of what they personally might or might not find offensive and who arrogantly conclude that if they don’t find it offensive then no one has any right to have a different opinion let aone have it respected? Y’know, the same people who would bring steak to a Hindu celebration and snack on a bacon double cheeseburger while waiting for a Bar MItzvah to start.
As “boar” as in a wild animal that cannot possibly understand that civilization requires that individuals actually have to exercise some control over where they do what? Pissing may be natural, and the only reason kids think it should be done out of sight is because adults tell them so, but I still don’t want my kids coming upon some lady squatting in the middle of a playground.
You read everything I posted and that’s all you came away with? To spoon feed, several people had asked ‘was she cute?’ After observing the above, I honestly didn’t think so. FTR, even the nicest of people shouldn’t be shooting nude pictorials in family recreation areas during business hours, unannounced, and without permission.
Thanks. I won’t get personally insulting with you though. That would be inappropriate. Like shooting nude pictorials in a family recreation area during business hours unannounced and without permission.
I was toying with making an analogy to shooting nude layouts of ‘The Girls of Toys R Us’ during store hours, without permission, and around little kids shopping for Hot-wheels and Barbies, but its become obvious that you’ve stopped listening.
I’d also like to thank Jackmannii for posting the link to show people what I knew, but had neglected to post. Paddle-boats, Indian crafts, and the ‘Wagon Wheel Pavillion’: what parent, when picking a place out to spend the day with their child, reads ‘adult photography’ into the above, especially at the beginning of Memorial Day weekend?
On the home page, I especially liked the new addition for the 2007 season:
“New children’s’ play system.
Ideal for children ages 5 through 12.”
Y’know, having myself participated (in a technical role) in the creation of “adult art”, it does puzzle me a bit how some people do not get it through their minds that there’s a time and there’s a place, and that one of the reasons we should mind the time and the place IS precisely because some people may not react very well to stumbling into our work. Some people overreact? Maybe. But if we took the proper precautions then we can know we did our part to mitigate it. Just going ahead and doing whatever we want and telling off the people who are bothered only goes so far. We cannot claim that one of the two parties in potential conflict has unfettered right to do their thing and the other party has to just back off in every aspect.
Rhinestones?
Hur? Your diatribe about how rude she was at the ticket window was in response to the question “was she cute”? I’m trying to follow the logic there, but there just doesn’t seem to be any.
You got a bunch of responses about how it’s just a naked person, how it’s not that huge a deal, and how you’re overreacting. So you posted a response saying “Ok, lots of catch-up to do today.”, which a reasonable person would presume to mean you were going to address the main points of contention. Such reasonable person might also presume that the whole issue of the woman’s rudeness actually was supposed to have something to do with this. And hence the confusion, in that it apparently has nothing to do with it.
And now your “spoon-feeding” :rolleyes: to me the information that you were responding to the question “was she cute” renders your point even less comprehensible.
Let’s find out if he’s overreating. Tomorrow, when America’s beaches are crowded, why don’t all you who don’t think there is anything wrong with this take a friend and a camera to a beach, disrobe, have your friend take some photos and see if its a big deal. I get the feeling that most of you believe this should be a perfectly OK situation and no reasonable human being will have any sort of issue with it, so I’d like to see if thats true. My guess is that you’ll discover that Count Blucher is having a perfectly normal reaction to people being nude in a public setting.
overeating - is that some sort of freudian slip…overreacting.
Never said it was “perfectly OK”; it’s just not the end of the world when someone sees a breast.
and of course you can substantiate that was claimed?
(fixed coding)
I’ve read all the posts here and never once saw someone say it was the end of the world.
I’m not sure why there’s this consistent argument from some people that we should be totally fine with people breaking hundreds of years of socially proper behavior.
If a woman walks nude into a shopping mall (pretty analogous to the situation of a privately owned park open to the public), no, it isn’t the biggest deal in the world. It’s also not appropriate behavior, and is also very unusual behavior. Noting that it is unusual and inappropriate isn’t the same thing as saying nudity is unusual and inappropriate, but rather noting that nudity is unusual and inappropriate in that setting. A point which is subjectively true.
That reminds me.
For those who’ve emoted about the classic beauty of the nekkid human (or anyway, female) form - have you taken a good look around you in public lately?
I was picking up supplies at Lowe’s this weekend, and while the warm weather wasn’t bringing out nudists, there was an awful lot of exposed puffy, wrinkled and sun-scorched skin that, to tell the truth, wasn’t all that appetizing to see. There’s a biological reason why intimate activities generally take place after dark.
Nature-in-the-buff photo enthusiasts of America - remember that others around you are planning cookouts this holiday weekend. Don’t spoil their appetites. 