OK, I’m not being asinine here, but genuinely curious: do you see why I mention Albee–and Beckett, and Bill Griffith–in this discussion? What do I think they have in common with SpaceJackson/OJSimpson/Melanoma? I have no beef with you either, Uncle, but in reading the views of some of the other posters around here lately, I feel as if I’m overhearing the chit-chat in the prelude to a book burning.
All I can say, Sam, is hang in there. You’re doing fine. You are right to defend yourself against any false accusations, but don’t let it get the best of you. Any reference to an absurdist playwright and self-described, “demonic social critic,” garners respect in my book. If the wild accusations continue, it may be best to just let it drop at some point and then move on to post in other threads; at any rate I recommend sticking around and toughing it out. The witch hunts usually don’t last long and any reference to an absurdist playwright, and self-described, “demonic social critic,” garners respect in my book.
I’ll side with Uncle Beer that Sam Vimes shouldn’t be blacklisted. Even though he doesn’t like me. He’s funny and seems very smart.
I found Space Jackson and OJ irritating, but as long as they were staying in MPSIMS they weren’t doing any damage. When they carried the gibberish into Great Debates, they earned their place in Coventry.
But this thread is turning into a bit of a witchhunt. I don’t think Vimes has anything to do with those two, except he sees some kind of parallels between them and other people he respects. I’ll admit that I don’t know who they are. And I humbly submit that if he wants to make a case for SJ and OJS, he might want to clue us ignorant folk in.
It’s a little tiresome that every new troll or irritation is accused of being an old enemy in disguise. Can’t we just deal with each new terror as it comes, rather than risk incriminating the innocent in our zeal?
Melanoma really ought to be at the very least reprimanded; that kind of hostility is not appropriate in this forum.
Bah, that took too long to write; this thread has had another 3 or 4 posts since I hit Reply. Also, I caught a line in Vimes’ post I hadn’t before:
Isn’t that rather- severe? No one has suggested having the mods yank any posts; it’s just asking people who dislike them to stop talking about it.
People ** should not ** decide to ignore the trolls named here because of this thread, and I don’t think Alphagene was trying to convince anyone to start hating them His point was that if you think their posts aren’t worth commenting on, not to comment on it.
Anyone who makes his judgement about another posts based on a flame or appeal to Coventry is doing that poster a grave injustice. Decisions should be made based on the quality of posts, not the other TMs views about them.
–John
Do you see why I use numbered lists, Mr. Vimes? I have trouble seguing between points, and it helps keep my ideas from getting muddled. As I fear they have in my last two posts.
It’s been SO LONG since a “brand new” poster has been for real/not a retard/worth a half a damn, maybe the door to new accounts ought to be shut entirely for a while?
Just a modest proposal from a guy who hates lamers and their preadolescent spewings more than just about anybody alive or dead.
What are you talking about, RTA? Every day, new posters join who are completely terrific, people who are great additions to the board. It’s just that they don’t seem new for long at all because they slip into the rythm of the board. It only seems like most new posters are jerks because they’re the ones getting all the attention.
If we ever close the door to new members, I’ll take a hike.
Fair? Maybe not. But it seems like lately, every time I read some example of worthless idiocy, I flick my eyes to the left and see “Posts: 12”, or “Posts: 30” or “Posts: 8”, etc.
“Registered: Feb 2000” is real common too … Go figure.
Yeah, but RTA, when you read a good post you * don’t * flick your eyes over there- so you don’t see that it says “Registered Feb 2000” there, too.
Yes, most trolls are new, because they don’t stay long before they get bored with us. But you’re making a logical error. (One with a latin name that slips my mind- anybody?)
All C being B, doesn’t mean all B are C.
And most trolls being new doesn’t make all newbies trolls.
Our trolls are recent registrants. This is only logical- it is extremely hard to be a troll for an extended period of time without stepping over a boundary and getting oneself banned. Ergo, trolls tend to have recent dates in registry, and few accumulated posts (under their current alias).
However, because A means B does not mean that B means A. New registrants do not automatically make trolls.
Besides, I’ve seen some long-established posters to this MB get all flaky-psycho as well (I call your attention to NanoByte; see the Pit for details).
Wow something that alphagene and I can agree on. Will wonders never cease?
I can agree with alphagene in the OP insofar as Yue Han interprets what he meant.
I elect to take posts on an individual basis. Sometimes, smart people say stupid things, just ask louie about me. I am as guilty of it as anyone.
Anyone who knows me knows that I am not really as new as
<~~~~~~~this
would imply. I just seem to have some issues with picking a handle that I really liked.
Anyway, I digress and ramble. What I mean is that if a post is nothing more that boorish divel, then one should not dignify it with a response.
But this should be done on a post by post basis, not by blackballing a certain poster. I think that is the respnsibilty of the admin, don’t you?
I don’t know, we’ll see how it goes, I have already run into this OJ character, and he didn’t have anything interesting to say.
how did it start? well i don’t know i just feel the craving. i see the flesh and it smells fresh and it’s just there for the taking…
VvvV
Not true. MPSIMS is a nice, quiet relaxing place to hang out at the end of the day. Then these guys come in here acting stupid, and honking off the peace-loving folks that come in here.
Just because they aren’t doing any damage to you, doesn’t mean they aren’t doing any damage.
Changing my sig, because Wally said to, and I really like Wally, and I’ll do anything he says, anytime he says to.