spanking

A firned of mine got engaged to a guy who feels that explaining things to kids is coddling them. She did not believe in spanking them, but rather explained the reason for things and when they acted out used timeouts and such. Seemed to work fairly well, but her fiance ended all that. It changed to “do as i say now, i don’t need a reason because i am an adult.”

I had to stop being her friend shortly after that because the asshole was trying to get my husband to treat me like that.
Some ppl feel that explaining why to kids is coddling them and spanking without explanation is the way to go.

I agree that you don’t necessarily need to spank to discipline a child, but that doesn’t mean that spanking doesn’t work. As evidence I submit the millions, maybe billions of people throughout human history who grew up to be fairly normal, healthy adults who got along with their parents just fine, even though they were spanked. I happen to be such a person. Gaudere, you make spanking sound like it’s the same as punching a child in the face with a fist. It isn’t. Speaking from my own experience, the pain that comes from being smacked on the buttocks is not exactly crippling, nor did it make me fear my mother. Rather, it made me realize that when she grabbed that wooden spoon I had crossed the line.

I’m really surprised at the tone of many of the posts in here. Many people sound like they think children are gentle little lambs, whose precious psyches could be permanently warped by a few good whacks on the butt. A child doesn’t know right from wrong until he’s taught. For most children (at least for me back when I was one one) it boils down to the following equation:

If deed A = unpleasant punishment (“time out,” spanking, etc.), then deed A = BAD deed!

This is about as complicated a concept as most children under the age of 8 can understand. Like I said before, I think it is possible to raise a child without spanking, but not without universally enforced discipline. SOME type of unpleasant punishment must follow misbehavior. Whether it’s physical pain (spanking) or emotional pain (standing in a corner) isn’t important. The child must suffer a little, or he won’t get the message. But I think parents who tell themselves that they are better parents because they don’t “hit” their kids are fooling themselves. Their children are just suffering in a different way for the sake of discipline.

I hope everybody understands how I’m using the word “suffer” here.

Lizard

I agree completely with the first sentence, but not with the second.

The difference I see between one kind of pain and the other is that spanking has the potential to cause fear. I know it can be done in a way that it doesn’t, but most probably those are the cases where another method would have worked just as well.

Satan mentioned two ocasions when he was spanked as a child. I provided my own account of an extreme situation when it could have been warranted. But those were all exceptional cases. I don’t think that’s what we are debating here. We are talking about spanking as an accepted tactic to be used to discipline our kids. The only justification I’ve ever heard for spanking is that sometimes nothing else works. But if nothing else works on a regular basis, there is obviously something wrong going on. You might end up (trying to) control your children by fear, because you failed every other way.

I was spanked as a child and I never associated violence with the spanking and it caused me to think twice before I did something that my father or mother had told me not to do.

I will have to heartily agree with this…I was spanked as a child for things which were morally and legally wrong. I was never spanked for no reason at all, nor was it unjust. I will spank my kids when I have them. A belting never did me any harm. I consider myself to be a morally strong person and can see no harm in teaching your children right from wrong. If my parents hadn’t brought me up in this manner, I probably wouldn’t love them as much as I do now!

My step mother used to lie to get me in trouble and my father would spank me for both the thing she said i did and for lying about it. I was 12. It was huliliating. I lost a lot of respect for my father because of that.

I was not only beaten as a child, but watched my brothers and sisters beaten, and sometimes that was worse than getting it myself. I saw what it looked like to have an adult out of control, it was ugly and vicious. We were all terrified of our parents, and that is what they wanted.

HOWEVER, if you don’t punish in anger, and have clearly designed procedures for what constitutes a spanking, don’t use your hand and love your kids. I don’t think spanking is a horrible thing. My two sons knew if they lied, if they deliberately broke or taunted either one another or another child, they would be spanked, I used a bolo paddle that I had taken the rubber ball off. That was all it was used for, three whacks and as a last resort. By the time they were 8, neither were spanked again.

My oldest son paid me the biggest compliment of my life, not too long ago this subject came up, and he told me he remembered me spanking Billy (youngest son who was four when this incident happened) when Billy bit DJ who had been sitting quietly playing with his own toys. Billy got his three whacks and was sitting crying in his ‘time out’ chair. I went back to the back of the house with the paddle and DJ told me he followed after I had left, closing the bathroom door behind me. I had turned on the water to the sink and started crying into a towel.

He confessed he had followed and had been so moved by hearing me cry ‘you NEVER cry, Mom’ that it made him that much more aware that he never wanted to put ME through having to spank him again. Sappy, and corny, but THAT made me cry too!

“Come here son. Daddy isn’t angry that you were very naughty today. Really, I’m not angry”. SWAT SWAT SWAT(spanking kid) “Just remember junior, that spanking wasn’t in anger” Never spank in anger? What kind of nonsense is that? My kid hurts another child or tells a bunch of lies I’m not supposed to be angry? If you’re talking about uncontrolable anger, that’s different. But general anger over the misbehavior of your own kid…that is completely acceptable!

By the way, spankings are the only truely effective punishment for younger kids who cannot be reasoned with (under 12). Whenever I see a parent try to reason with their 4 year old I want to puke.

Disipline is so much easier with a kid who is 16+ because you have that wonderful carrot to dangle in front of them…car keys!:wink:

Spanking.

All for it.

Beating.

Not for it.

Personal observation here. Unfounded, unproven, just 20+ years of actually observing the world around me. It goes as follows:

I recall when the Great No Spanking Movement swept through the United States, backed up by assorted books which seemed to sail off of the pressed overnight. (Astonishing isn’t it, that writers of good books have to fight to get in print, but once a fad hits, every schmuck who can plagiarize anyone else on the topic gets nearly a best seller?) I loudly proclaimed back then that it was all a bad idea, but was ignored.

A kinder, gentler USA was in the works. Since then, over decades, I’ve observed the increase in selfish attitudes in kids, who become adults, who own or run businesses who no longer care about workers or customers. I’ve seen an increase in violent acts by children, an increase in child gangs, an increase in juvenile delinquency, a decrease in parental control, school authority, respect for the law, respect for each other and a decrease in the ability to obey and respect authority. I’ve also observed an increase in the popularity of music which promotes rape, murder, drugs, abuse, killing cops, selling drugs and gangs.

I was whipped as a child – for damn good reasons and learned not to do certain things. I was never beaten. I recall my sister as a small child going into a tantrum, screaming, kicking, shrieking and all of that and my mother warned her to knock it off. She wouldn’t. My mother picked her up, swatter her hard on the ass and told her now she had something to cry about.

The next time she pulled a tantrum, my mother warned her once and she stopped.

When I was a teen and full of myself, I swore at my Mother in my Father’s presence during an argument. My Dad smacked me open handed across the mouth – no blood or bruising but a hell of a sting – and warned me never to talk that way to my Mother again. I never have. We were taught that stealing is not a good thing and being mean towards others wasn’t either.

I shot my brother in the eye with one of those cork shooting pop guns – minus the cork but the air jet hurt. My mother removed the pop gun, swatted me on the ass pretty hard, sent me to my room and explained why shooting people in the eye was a bad thing. My brother suffered no injury.

I got into a squabble with my sister when I was young and smacked her one and made her cry. I got swatted by my father hard enough to make me cry and told that smacking one’s sister was a bad thing. So, the next time we argued, I shoved her and she fell and cried and my dad swatted me hard enough to make me cry and explained that hurting my sister in any way was a bad thing.

In the next argument, being young, I screamed shrilly at her, which made her cry (she cried a lot, my sister), and I got sent to my room without being spanked.

(I was such a peach at 9.)

I know a woman with a problem boy who does not hit. He does as he pleases. She sends him to his room and he walks out to play with his friends. She has the cops bring him home and threaten him and when they leave, he cusses her out and does as he wants. She threatened to swat him and he threatened to call the cops if she did.

Me, my brothers and my sister have no police records. All of us have been to college. The close friends I grew up with whose parents did not practice the no spanking method have no police records. Most of the acquaintances of my era have no police records.

Almost every new acquaintance I’ve met lately who has a young family with children have, in my opinion, some serious behavioral problems. I’ve been in homes where the kids act up at the dinner table, where they talk back to Mom and dad, where they walk out swearing, and even where they wear their stinking backwards baseball caps to supper.

A young child tests the parental authority. Talking and time out doesn’t solve the problem. A kid who insists on getting into mommys make up will keep right on doing so until they get a mild smack on the ass and told why they got that smack. Then they know Mom and Dad mean business.

A girl I know with a teen told him not to ride his bike inside on her wooden floors. (Like he had to be told?) When she went out, he not only rode his bike inside but did wheelies and left black marks. She did not believe in spankings. She yelled at him. He cussed her out and left. She told him not to hang with some trouble makers. He did and got in trouble. She got him out. She grounded him. He went out anyhow. Talks did no good. She took away his allowance, so he stole money from her and anyone else. He was sent to a therapist – and refused to cooperate. HRS could do nothing. The cops could only do something if he broke the law.

So, what is the solution? More chats? How about some time outs? Uh, how will she enforce the time outs? Restriction? He ignores those.

I went to visit her once when he was there and I’m kind of big, but not that big. He was a pain in the ass while I was trying to talk to his Mom. Then he tried to pick my pocket while I was distracted and I caught him at it and deliberately almost wrung his hand off of his wrist.

He never bothered me again when I went to visit. In fact, he was quite polite.

Stimulus and response. Bad things bring a measure of pain. Individuals tend to avoid pain so they associate doing bad things with pain and avoid doing such things.

Okay, so spanking tells a kid violence is good?

Well, so did almost every fucking cartoon I watched as a kid. And the sports we grew up with, football primarily.

Whatt I learned is that THERE IS A TIME AND PLACE FOR EVERYTHING, including violence.

For example, on the football field. And if I was a total and complete brat, it was a form of punishment.

You see, we were not just pounded and sent away to wonder. My parents COMMUNICATED with us as to WHAT we did wrong and WHY it necessetated the punishment we were getting and how they would NEVER do it again if we did not do that (or something similar) again.

Maybe some people are spanking away and not communicating with their kids. I submit that the latter is the problem, not the former.


Yer pal,
Satan

[sub]TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
Four months, one week, five days, 6 hours, 44 minutes and 44 seconds.
5371 cigarettes not smoked, saving $671.40.
Life saved: 2 weeks, 4 days, 15 hours, 35 minutes.[/sub]

"Satan is not an unattractive person."-Drain Bead
[sub]Thanks for the ringing endorsement, honey!*[/sub]

Satan
My father did always communicate what I did wrong, I just wish he did it differently.

This being an emotional subject, personal history has some bearing on people’s stand on the issue. I tend to agree with you; there is a time and a place for everything, including violence. From what I understand, your parents seemed to be able to reduce that to a couple of occasions. My dad figured it a bit differently.

There’s a risk associated with spanking, because of the inherent violent nature. I did talk in absolutes in my first post, but I also provided a counter-example. It sounds contradictory, but it was intentional; I just tried to express my own feeling that when someone does it, it must be for a really good reason, in an exceptional situation.

See, I believe if there’s a time for violence, and there is, it can’t be on a regular basis. When spanking is as common as violence in cartoons and sports, something is wrong.

I say this every time one of these parenting threads (breastfeeding, spanking, whatever) comes up and it always gets buried in the mire. However, here goes again:

There are a lot of different ways to raise kids. Most of these methods work. Kids are pretty hard to screw up and most kids will turn out okay however you choose to raise them.

You can’t wreck a kid by spanking him/her. I am, of course, referring to spanking (an occasional swat on the butt with a hand or object) NOT beating. Neither can you wreck a kid by not spanking. I was spanked (very rarely). I spanked my own kids (also very rarely) when they were little. They are very good, respectful kids and rather less violent than the norm. Neither has ever been in a physical fight at school or play and they never hit each other – although they do argue often. They are now 13 and 14. My sister didn’t believe in spanking and never spanked her kids. They are now teenagers (15, 17 and 19) and also very, very good kids.

I will say that a willingness to smack makes raising toddlers a little easier. Small children are savages and until they are old enough to understand consequences an occasional swat is really effective. My sister’s kids, great as they are now, were borderline rampaging monsters as toddlers. Eventually, ‘timeout’ began to work and they became the good kids they are today. My own kids were much easier to be around from age 2 - 4 – ‘easy’ being a subjective term when applied to kids this age, of course.

I will also say that spanking, from my observation, isn’t at all effective on older kids. Once a kid is school age other methods just work better. And, if you’re still spanking to discipline a teenager, you’ve got problems. In my husband’s family, spanking only stopped when the boys got old enough to hit their father back – by then, it wasn’t discipline-by-spanking it was attempted-discipline-by-fist-fight. Ick. Of course, they were a pretty dysfuntional family on many fronts and the fist fights were just one manifestation of the manny, manny problems that led my husband to leave school and home at age 15 to join the navy!

part of the problem here folk-
you hear all these people saying “spanking is ok, but beating is wrong, wrong, wrong”

Have you EVER talked to some one who’s been convicted of beating their child??? I have. Guess what, THEY also say “spanking is ok, but beating is wrong, wrong, wrong, and ** I ** did ** not ** beat my child.”

therein lies the problem.
my mom would smack me across the face, pull my hair etc etc. and then claim that we were never spanked/abused.
and yea, I’m a productive member of society today, but frankly think I probably would still have been had I NOT been swatted around. And, probably would have avoided years of therapy.

Occasional spankings aren’t going to turn your child into a serial killer, but they also have a definite shelf life. At some point, you are going to have to use some other form of discipline, unless you think you are going to be putting your teenager over your knee.

Several people have suggested that spankings are almost necessary with young (esp preverbal) children. I disagree. First, the ability to understand language comes long before the ability to speak it. Your one year old understands a whole lot more than most people realize. But, for some reason, so many people seem to have the idea that “if I don’t spank, I can’t do anything.”

I had the saddest conversation with a woman recently at our local pool. Her two year old was picking up rocks from the beach and throwing them in the water. She looked at me apologetically and said, “I know he shouldn’t be doing that, but I don’t know how to stop him.” WTF?!? She had made a couple attempts to distract him-suggesting he make a pile of rocks by the wall-but of course he ignored her. And she said “no, no…” a couple times. But of course he ignored her. He then climbed up onto the wall and started throwing rocks at us. Did she stop him? No. I removed my 2yo from his reach.

Now I’m sure that many people would say that simply swatting his butt when he refused to stop would get his attention and cause him to obey. But I submit that, though probably effective, it is the easy way out and, over time, less effective. Had this been my child, I would have immediately walked over to her, held her hands, told her that throwing rocks was not allowed, and helped her put them down. I would have stayed with her until I was sure she understood. I would have helped her find something else to do if she needed that. Nine times out of ten, this is all it would take, because she knows that I mean what I say, and that I will physically prevent her from doing something that is dangerous or destructive. At one year of age, I would have simply scooped her up and said “no throwing rocks.” She would certainly have understood the “no” but she wouldn’t have had the self control to stop on her own. At two, I can give her the chance to do so. She won’t understand why I made her stop, but she will understand that she has to. At four, I would only have to use a verbal “no” and then I could explain why throwing rocks was forbidden.

Once in a while, though, she might be really attracted to something forbidden, or she might be testing her limits. In that case, I simply pick her up and remove her from the situation. Yes, she might squall, but I figure a little noise is preferable to thrown rocks. And I don’t scold her for squalling, either. She is allowed to be disappointed, and 2yos express disappointment loudly. If she needs to do so, and we are in public, we go to the car or some other more private (read: less annoying to passersby) area, until she is done.

I will point out that my children never throw the “I want it and I’ll scream until I get it” kind of tantrum in stores. They learned early on that tantrums have no effect on my decisions. At home, I walked away (or, when they were very young, turned my back) until they were done. My youngest ( just turned 2) will tantrum for quite a while, and get to the point where it becomes self-perpetuating, so I might walk over and ask, “are you done? do you need a hug?” Usually, she is and does. Then, we can have a talk and a cuddle.

As they get older, I can use words more than physical removal from dangerous situations, and those words are generally effective, because they have learned, through experience, that if they do not stop themselves, I will stop them myself. I don’t have to spank to get that point across, and I believe it is better for my relationship with my child if I don’t.

Yes, you can reason with a 4yo, if that 4yo has been dealt with rationally and respectfully. But if, when your 4yo smacks his sister, you respond with “I am now going to hit you to impress upon you that hitting is unacceptable” how can you expect that 4yo to use reason elsewhere? If my 4yo refuses to clean up his blocks, I can spank him or I can pick them up myself, and put them in an out-of-reach but highly visible place (I favor the top of the refrigerator) for 3 or 4 days. He is then reminded on a regular basis that the penalty for refusing to clean up is the loss of that toy. After a few days, we take them down and try again. Or, I might tell him that we will have to skip reading stories, because I had to use the reading time to clean up after him. It takes more imagination and energy (both physical and emotional) but I don’t have to use violence against my children to impress upon them the need to behave in ways that benefit our family and our society.

My husband and I have a fairly simple parenting philosophy, which generally boils down to “teach by example.” If I want my children to say “please” and “thank you”, I must say it to them. If I don’t want my children to interrupt when I am speaking, I must not interrupt them needlessly or thoughtlessly. I must give their comments the same respect, and say “excuse me” when it is necessary, just as I want them to do. If I want them to show respect to others, I must model that same respect. And if I don’t want them to hit or otherwise use force to get their point across, I must show them that there are other options available.

:slight_smile:

Great post!

When taking care of a friend’s toddler that did tantrums, (his grandmother would give him his way if he threw a tantrum) we put him at the end of the well lit hall and told him that he could come back into the living room when he was prepared to behave in a civilized manner. It was not very far, but out of site but within earshot. That way we did not reinforce his behavior by paying attention to him or showing how bothered we were. One day he started to thow a tantrum and then walked down to the place we put him

For punishment of usual misbehavior it was sit still for 5 minute time, 15 min for second offense. Got he hated that. For throwing things or hitting someone with things that thing got put up out of reach but within sight.

His behavior did improve. He soon learned that going to lee’s house was not like visiting grandma.

RE: timeouts…
I did those with my son, and would set an oven timer to gauge the time.

it worked, too.

My son learned to throw the oven timer into the toilet…

Reason #129938998 he’s an only child.

Interesting topic.

One thing I haven’t seen commented on in this thread is the ability of children to understand wrong and to understand punishment. I’m referring to Piaget’s (correct if wrong, please) eight stages of moral development, which basically go from avoiding doing wrong to avoid punishment to avoiding doing wrong so as not to injure others or society. My point here is that is there some point in their development that children aren’t going to understand punishment unless it involved physical pain?

On a general level, and from personal experience, I don’t think spankings lead children to believe that violence is acceptable.

OTOH, my personal experience gives me pause. My family did believe in spankings. There were two kinds - mom’s swat on the butt at the instant of the trangression, and the more formal “wait until your father gets home” spankings. I can only recall one such spanking from pa, and it wasn’t really painful (and I’m sure there were one or two others), while I recall several from mom. The thing is, is that I grew to fear pa, and not mom. I think this is to some extent because pa wasn’t around much then (medical residency, etc.), and was the disciplinarian of the family, while mom was the provider of both rewards and punishments.
So, my advice is, if you are going to use corporal punishment, don’t have one parent be the set disciplinarian.

Sua

Lizard said:

My opinions:

1.) The difference between physical and emotional pain depends upon the age of the child. For much younger children (say, 5 and below), physical solutions may be effective, possibly more effective than emotional solutions. However, once you pass a certain age/emotional readiness for the child, the physical response (spanking)should be dropped in favor of completely emotional (timeouts, no TV, etc.) responses. The thought of spanking a 12-year-old seems utterly wrong to me on so many levels.

2.) Any type of punishment can be overdone. My father only hit me once, but he inflicted quite a bit of psychological damage on me through the use of emotional punishments.

3.) I have not yet had children, nor have I ever baby-sat; all I have as experience is some college-level child’s psychology courses taken in preparation to become a teacher. So I may well be full of crap.

In Canada - When you strike a child with an object be it a belt, switch, or a flyswatter you are guilty of committing child abuse.

My almost three year old daughter can be reasoned with and she understands the consequences to her actions. She knows when she has done something wrong. The rare swats on the behind she has received have been so light they could not have caused any physical harm but they do have an extreme emotional impact on her.

Our boys are 7 and 10, they don’t get spankings because they understand actions and consequences very well.

I have mentioned this before on the last spanking thread ,but I will bring it up again: Different kids respond differently. I am one of six children and my parents had to use different methods to disipline every one of us. Some kids are high-empathy–the idea of having mom and dad disappointed in them is unbearable. Other kids don’t seem to mind. Some kids learn to avoid pain/shock: others just get stubborn. With some kids being ignored is hell on earth–for others it is a golden oppertunity to get into stuff. Differnet children have different buttons. Some dont have any buttons at all, and those are the most diffucult to raise, or even to keep safe (my baby sister was like this).

This is a bit of a highjack, but I want to make a point about comminicating with children. Although I agree that parents should do thier best to communicate with there kids, and of course should always explain why someone is being punnished, I think that it is important that kids know that sometimes they have to obey thier parents just because they are children. There are situtions when we can’t explain to our kids why they can’t do something–you don’t want them going to school saying that mom said they can’t sleep over at Jenny’s house because her dad is a creep, when you have no evidence therte is anything really wrong with the man. Also, later in life it is in a child’s advantage to know that, at least on occasion, mom and dad MIGHT know what they are talking about, even if the REASONS they wont let you get your face tatooed are not immediatly apparent. I think that setting up a pattern where mom and dad’s authority is justified only by thier ability to explain their reasoning, and not to a certain degree on their simple status as the parents is ultimitly counterproductive.

It never fails to amaze me that people who’d never think of offering an opinion on which Magnetic Resonance Imaging system their hospital should buy will pipe right up with the definitive answer on how children should be raised, despite having invested an equal amount of time studying each issue. This thread, like the last one on this subject, is rife with sweeping statements like this one, courtesy of pkbites:

If I weren’t confident that it would not be forthcoming, I’d ask for the data on which this contention is based. As it stands, I suppose that statement might be true for children under 12 who cannot be reasoned with because their parents have never attempted to do so, but to suggest that generally speaking children under 12 cannot be disciplined in any manner other than by hitting them every time they do something wrong or inconvenient runs counter to everything we now know about the intellectual and emotional development of children, not to mention the experience of countless parents.

That anyone would suggest, however, that reasoning with a four-year-old is not only pointless but disgusting makes me crazy. Aside from all other considerations, one might ask how, in the absence of any experience in dealing with rational adults, you would expect a child to ever learn to do so? I don’t believe for a second that parents have to succeed in convincing their kids to do what the parent wants or give in to what the kid wants, but I do think that there’s a lot more to be gained by explaining what’s going to happen and why to a child than by simply pummeling them into submission to the parent’s will. Forget reasoning with a four-year-old – my three-year-old son more often than not does what we ask of him, even when it’s not necessarily what he wants to do; he does argue, protest, and even throw tantrums occasionally, but since he’s learned that they don’t buy him anything (and indeed they often cost him other things he wants) they’re rare and don’t last long. Why are we able to reason with him? Because we’ve been doing so since well before he started to speak and because he knows that we try to take his feelings and desires into account, even if we can’t always accomodate them.

I don’t think I actually expect to change anyone’s mind on this subject; many people seem to be so deeply devoted to the idea that hitting their kids is the right thing to do that it matters little to them whether or not it can be empirically shown to be effective in positively shaping behavior. Finding effective ways of disciplining any individual child is difficult work and is incredibly frustrating at times; so much so apparently, that many people would prefer to just whack the kid and assume that they’ve done their job as a parent – if it doesn’t work, what the hell, they did what they could, right?

OTOH, people like robinh give me hope.