spanking

Manda JO:

I’m not a professional but I am intelligent and observant and have watched changes in society since the introduction of the anti-spanking movement all the way to the current morass of Children’s Rights laws. I actually have weeded out various influences created by advanced technology and certain changes in society and compared various accepted business practices from the pre-no spanking days to those accepted today.

My results? I consider those who believe that a hand should never be laid on a child are nuts, wimps, potentially bad parents and drastically misled by society mass media hysteria.

Reasons?

Children I know who have become adults under the no spanking rule are, upon approach, basically pleasant and conform to societies rules and regulations. However, they are poor lower level workers, usually irritated that they cannot get their own way or convinced that they know best. They make poor managers, being interested in promotion at almost any cost, not very sympathetic to their workers needs, and far to willing to bend the rules to meet quotas. They make poor bosses, for the same reasons, plus being interested mainly in personal power and personal gain at almost any cost.

They tend to be possession oriented – expensive televisions, stereos, cars packed full of equipment, cell phones, expensive play toys, expensive homes and they loose contact with people not as well off as they.

Men and women alike who own or run small businesses tend to become ‘ruthless’, developing a hard to describe attitude that is essentially cold and hard. (Curiously enough, it shows up in the way they look. The men tend to all wear the same style of hair cut and their faces all tend to have the same friendly-don’t-shit-me look, and they don’t appear compassionate or sympathetic. The women are the same. Older women, however, tend to get short haircuts. These women are not those one would go to for sympathy.)

Since the 70s, the saying of a good days work for a good days pay has become a joke. More and more companies have younger executives from the ‘new’ era who are not interested in employee loyalty but only in production and costs. The new saying is ‘if you don’t do it as we want it, we’ll get someone who will.’ Never before has laying off a few thousand long term employees actually generated an increase in the price of a companies stock, which encourages other ‘new era’ bosses in slow companies to do the same.

The guys who invented a video game killing cops are ‘new age’ and when they were asked about their responsibility in releasing such a game that might encourage children to be crooks and killers, they scoffed at the concept and said it was only a game. Of course, by then it was common knowledge that such games influenced kids. These guys, however, were well on the way to making millions and took no responsibility for anything kids might do because of their game.

I’ve seen the surge of hackers who take great delight in deliberately wrecking computer systems because they can, whether or not doing so might cause harm to people or even death. They were never taught a social conscience.

I’ve watched the increase of juvenile delinquency, the upswing of child molestation claims being used as weapons by kids who were never molested. I seen the respect for the law drop sharply in our kids and the respect for adults drop just as fast. There have been more cases of wanton vandalism than I recall happening because the kids know that no harm will come to them.

When I was a kid, abandoned houses could remain intact for ages, maybe used as a secret hide out by kids, but never wrecked just to wreck something. Now I have observed that abandoned buildings get vandalized and wrecked within short order.

I have friends who have children and they don’t hit them and I certainly would because they demand to get their own way and time outs, rationalizing, explanations and all of that crap does not seem to work the older they get.

If a kid talked back to a Teacher in school, the teacher grabbed his arm and hauled him to the principal, who called his folks. When he got home, he probably got a spanking and he did not talk back again. Now days, a teacher may not touch a kid because the new era parents have passed no hit laws. A kid can smack a teacher and get by with minor punishment, knowing that no one will smack him back. (I had a shop teacher who had a little philosophy. Get along with him and he got along with you. If you smacked or shoved him, he’d deck you and drag you to the office. Those few who tested his philosophy did it only once.)

I know some teachers today. I would not want their job. Discipline has been taken out of their hands by you litigious, no-spank, no touch folks. That makes their job so much harder.

Now, in some States it’s illegal to paddle you own kids. You can be arrested for doing so and there have been many false accusations made by kids when they’re pissed at mom or dad to get mom or dad shoved in the can for the night. One man, demanding the his teenaged daughter not go out that night, found her not willing to obey him. She was going out no matter what he said and she colorfully told him so. So he slapped her face. She called the cops, who said he could not hit her. He went to jail.

So, all of you sweet, loving, rational and civilized folks who don’t believe in any form of physical punishment, do the research yourself. The current mess in the schools comes from people like you and your willingness to sue the crap out of any teacher touching your darling little beast. The coldness of corporate America is the result of new era people taking over who are used to getting their own way.

Even animals in nature discipline their young with mild pain if they are bad.

I was spanked as a child. I was never beaten, bruised nor tossed around. I never had my hair pulled, got violently shaken or knocked across the room. I learned a whole lot of things, enforced the sting of a slap that I’ve carried through into adult life. I know I could not release a game that might convince a few kids that killing cops is fun. I could not lay off 1500 people just to get the company stock up a few points because I’d consider those people, their families, wonder who might be struggling with medical costs and who might go under without a weekly check.

I certainly could not hack into a medical computer and screw it up, knowing that people might suffer or die nor could I release a virus into the net knowing that I could cause millions in damages. A lot of kids today think that doing so is fun because responsibility was never reinforced strictly into them.

Kids want something today and it seems like they get it. When I was in high school, the parking lot was filled with old, cherished first cars. Most were in various stages of decomposition, many were old but in good shape. Only the ‘rich kids’ had reasonably new ones. There were the occasional, much admired, motorcycles.

Now I drive by the school and the parking lot is filled with shiny, nearly new cars. Some are new. Most have those friggin’ window rattling stereos in them that cost about 4 grand. Custom motorcycles are dotted here and there along with the occasional expensive import. There doesn’t seem to be a rolling wreck among them. (I ignore the occasional battered pick up truck but even that is being replaced by new ones, sitting like 4 inches from the ground and absolutely not meant to carry anything in the bed.)

Lastly, I was crawling through the local shopping mall a few days ago when some young punk, probably all of 16, dressed in the usual baggy crap, stepped off of the curb, looking right at me. I slammed on the brakes and yelled at the little shit. He went into his ‘anger dance’ – you know, arms all over the place like a rapper, hands in all sorts of twisty signs, jumping around and calling me names, baggy pants fluttering and generally looking like a jerk.

Then he bounced up and kicked my car and threatened me, so I got out and charged the little shit. I was going to kick his ass, but he took off and I’m not all that fast anymore. He stopped about a block away to swear at me more and I returned to my car – and actually got some applause from the interested adult bystanders.

There was a time when no kid would do that to an adult, but then, there was a time when kids knew that they could not get away with pulling a bunch of crap.

Maybe I should loose a few pounds. I might be faster on my feet if it happens again.

“I love my kids. I try and bring 'em up the right way…not spanking 'em. I find I don’t have to spank 'em. I find that waving the gun around pretty much gets the same job done.”

-Dennis Leary
…Love that guy.

FarTrekker, I am not going to address your post, but I wanted to point out that you attributed rakensack’s quote to me.

Why don’t you do the research? The psychological studies I have seen primarily show that spanking does not decrease aggression, and often increases it. I have done the research, and the majority of the evidence does not show that spanking is a truly effective method of punishment. You make a lot of allegations that the modern world’s ills are due to not spanking kids, but you don’t support any of them besides simply giving your own opinion. I’d advise you to look into the issue a bit more yourself before dismissing parents who choose not to spank as “nuts” or “wimps”. I respect my mother tremendously because she had a rule for us that hitting other people (except to protect the self or others) was simply wrong–and she never thought it was acceptable to violate this rule herself to teach it. She was no wimp, and as she taught Child Psych and Psych for many years and raised two moral and successful children, I don’t think her decision not to spank was “nuts” either.

Um, animals can’t reason with their young. I certainly do not intend to raise my child based on what animals do.

Was it Chris Rock who said that children need 4 ass-whuppin’s? One for Lying, Cheating, Stealing, and Disrespecting People.

My parents spanked me a few times. I remember every single one clearly. Often it was for something my brothers had done that I hadn’t. Whoever (capacitor?) said “Make sure that the child has in fact committed the transgression” is dead on - nothing rankles like a spanking when you know you are innocent - and my brothers loved making each other (and me) take the fall for stuff. Kids have a VERY strong sense of injustice, and their trust will never survive a misplaced spanking.

I’d say spanking had zero effect on me one way or the other - it never made me change the behavior that led to the spanking (except for immediately following it). Neither did grounding, reasoning, taking toy or privilege away, physically removing me from a situation, yelling, or expressing disappointment. I was going to do what I was going to do, and punishment just made me more sneaky about whatever it was. I was one stubborn kid.

I don’t know what I’ll do with my kids (when and if I have them). I think spankings are more about shock and humiliation than inflicting pain - the humiliation lasts longer than the physical pain. I do think kids are different and respond to different punishments, and it will depend. I would never say I was abused as a result of the spankings I did receive, and I do believe they were given with love and fear that if I wasn’t punished I’d turn into some kind of sociopath.

Ha ha, here I am.

I will agree with the general feeling that there has been a rise, in the last generation or two, of a larger group of selfish, disprespectful children who often turn into unhappy and unpleasant adults. But I will continue to insist that, while these children are certainly the product of poor parenting, the lack of spankings is not the issue. It is possible to raise polite, thoughtful children without using violence as a teaching aid.

To those who insist that children cannot be reasoned with and those who aren’t spanked must necessarily grow up to be selfish and rude, I offer the following stories.

Yesterday, I was about to change my just-turned-2 year old daughter. She was wriggling around and being silly. I asked her to please hold still, but she continued to squirm. So I simultaneously put my hand on her belly and said her name firmly to get her full attention, and said, “if you wiggle while I’m changing you, you will get poop on your bed.” Then I waited for a second for this to filter through, and then offered my opinion on this possibility, “yuck!” She nodded, and repeated, “yuck!” and held still. Is this not evidence of rational thought? Please note that I did not scold or lecture. I simply reminded her of the possible consequences, and she acted accordingly.

I will also note that there were plenty of times that I physically held her down for changes when she was 9 months or so. At that age, she was too concerned with movement to ever want to sit still, and too young to understand why it had to be done. But I still didn’t yell at her or punish her; she was only behaving in a manner appropriate to her age. I just changed her on the floor for a while with my leg slung over her middle. Eventually, she figured out that she was going to have to lie still whether or not she wanted to, and gave in to the inevitable.

Last week, while shopping with my 2yo in the sling, she got bored and started leaning back. She is a big girl (is moving into 3T clothes) and this was painful. After asking her in an admittedly distracted way to stop, and not getting cooperation, I stopped what I was doing and had a real conversation with her. I looked her in the eyes and explained that she was hurting my arm and my back. She repeated it back to me in her own way, pointing to her arm, “this?” and back, “this?” and asking, “ouch?” “Yes,” I said. She thought about it for a second and then very deliberately leaned close to me. She didn’t arch away from me for the rest of the time we were there. Is this the action of a selfish, thoughtless person?

Before you assume that this child is unusually angelic and therefore not an accurate example, let me assure you that she is a perfectly normal toddler. In fact, my mom likes to describe her as “high maintainance.” She was, in the likely opinion of many people, spoiled rotten as a baby. She did not like to play lying down, so I “wore” her in a sling much of the day for the first 6 months. At that point she became more and more able to sit comfortably, and use her hands, and was more and more agreeable to playing by herself. She also has a very high need for physical attention and affection. I have never known a child (she is my fourth and I have spent a lot of time with a lot of children) who needed so much holding. She has only now {at my insistance) weaned from the breast. It has been a slow process and I was often frustrated, but I’m glad I was able to find ways to give her the attention she craved. She is now very independant, competent, and self-confident. I believe she is the way she is now because we let her find her independance in her own way and at her own pace. She has never been spanked and I try my best to raise her in the most respectful way I can. Of course, we are all human. We have our battles of will, we have our disagreements, the older kids will tease and taunt each other sometimes. But they know when they have done wrong and they don’t need to be hurt, physically or verbally, to learn to control themselves and change their behavior.

First let me preface this by saying I do not have kids, I am 21 years old and this is my personal opinion based upon things I have experienced.

I feel that if want well behaved kids you have to be consistent in your discipline, and make sure after the punishment that they know what they did wrong. My father used to spank us as children, then stand us in the corner (nose in the corner usually about 30-60 mins, big things wrong were even longer. I think the longest I spent was 2 hours, that was for destroying something out of spite though) After we got in trouble my father made sure we knew what we did wrong ( he would ask us and if we answered like a smart ass he would stand us back in the corner, he made us verbally acknowledge what we did wrong.) ON the other hand my cousin’s are complete terrors, they were raised in a single parent household for half of their lives (theirs though divorce, mine through a death) and my aunt (the sweet lady that she is) would always threaten punishment but never dole it out… In being raised this way my cousins, talk back constantly, and have no respect for any authority.

Manda Jo: Sorry for the error.

Gaudere

I disagree. I have found many books and articles and journals and reports defending both methods of discipline. However, it’s my own observations that I lean on to demonstrate my side of the issue and I have included influences from radio, television, movies and video games.

Heck, when the Three Stooges were big, there were always those kids who just had to poke each other in the eyes or smack one another with boards to discover that those things actually hurt. Once they discovered the results, they stopped.

I want to make sure that you understand that I promote spankings, not beatings. A spanking stings, consists of one swat or more, preferably on the bottom, leaves a red mark that fades in a short time and no bruises. I encourage a swat on the hand or arm as necessary, not smacking the kid with a closed fist and leaving bruises.

I’ve noticed that as the kids become older, past 10, the disciplinary problems increase. The advent of puberty makes things worse. Little kids often will listen to reason if treated sweetly, because it is a rare kid in a loving home, who, when below age 5 or 6, will not respond to some form of talk.

So, what do you do if your preteen rebels? Take away their allowance? That will barely slow them down. Ground them? How will you enforce this? Take away their TV? Remove their computer? So they go out. How do you stop this? Reasoning and talking? Suppose that doesn’t stop them? Send them to a shrink? That only works if they cooperate. Lock them in their rooms? (Yeah, like that will stop a kid for more than 10 minutes.) Call the cops to pick them up? Big deal. The cops won’t do more than bring them home. Send them to reform school? Not likely. Call in HRS? You’re likely to get your butt in a sling then.

Now what? How about if when you’re reasoning with the kid, he walks out on you and goes to see his friends? Are you going to grab him by the arm and forcibly restrain him? (Assault.) Spin him around and slap him? (Battery.) What if your daughter insists on seeing the local scumbag no matter how much you disapprove? (This turns fathers hair gray real fast.) She’s under 16 and having sex with him? (The last thing you want is a baby from her by Mr. Eventually-going-to-jail-for-life.)
What are you going to do? My father never beat us kids, though he did administer the occasional spanking, but he was a powerful man physically and mild of attitude. He had one point he assured us of as we grew into mouthy, rebellious teens, and that was that we were never too old to get hit. We listened to that, though we never tested the authority of the statement.

On a lesser example, I know of some people who reared kids with the no spanking method. As toddlers and grade schoolers, they were good little people but as they grew older the most emphatic word they seemed to develop was ‘no.’ Like ‘help your grandmother bring in her groceries please.’ – (no). ‘Hold the door open.’ – (no).

While I did not spot any tantrums or major arguments, I did observe much selfish behavior, a reluctance to do household chores, a demand for attention and a stubbornness that I considered unusual. From the selfish behavior and flat refusal to do some things requested by the parents, I wondered what type of adults they would become. Empathy was not big on their list.

The law cannot touch a kid until age 17 or 18 unless he/she commits a major crime and even then the punishment is minor. So, what do you think a kid will think knowing that his/her folks will have no way to forcibly punish him or her, that with a spoken word they can get their parents, teachers or any adult slapped in jail for sexual abuse with no actual proof, or arrested for assault with little or no proof? Plus their educators cannot lay a hand on them, even the police have to treat then differently than adults and any criminal record they get is cleared when they become legal adults. Not to mention the potential they have of being able to find a lawyer willing to sue parents and school on behalf of the kid.

I pray to God Gaudere will find the words that could make you re-evaluate your “certainties” even one bit. Your post simply rendered me speechless.

I, for one, don’t see anything wrong with that post.

Care to point out the glaring errors? Or do you need Gaudere to be your spokesperson for that as well?

(Note to Gaudere: I’m sure you wouldd be an able spokesperson should you desire the position. I bring this up because it doesn’t seem to be you ARE this person’s spokesperson and I fail to see what a post of “Wait until ______ gets here, (s)he’ll show you!” does to further the dialogue.)


Yer pal,
Satan

[sub]TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
Four months, one week, six days, 23 hours, 34 minutes and 16 seconds.
5439 cigarettes not smoked, saving $679.91.
Life saved: 2 weeks, 4 days, 21 hours, 15 minutes.[/sub]

"Satan is not an unattractive person."-Drain Bead
[sub]Thanks for the ringing endorsement, honey!*[/sub]

Fair enough, Satan. My post doesn’t do much to further the dialogue. I guess I got what I deserved, by flaming others. Sorry, FarTreker.

I didn’t invoke Gaudere as my spokesperson. She was simply the one to which the post above mine was addressed. Incidentally, her own position expressed earlier on this thread has much in common with my own, to the extend that I understand hers. That’s why I hoped she would find the right way to address the (quite inflamatory, in my opinion) points contained in FarTreker’s post.

It wasn’t a lynching call, which is what seemed to have ticked you off. (Now you can flame me for trying to read your mind.) I just hoped someone else would be able to reach to FarTreker better than I would have been able to. I didn’t say “I hope she’ll show you.” I said, quite literally, “I hope she’ll make you re-evaluate your views even one bit, because I’m not up to it”

I articulated my own stand the best I could in my other interventions. I have nothing more to say on the matter. But reading how we should be careful not to leave any bruises while we “discipline” our kids (maybe it was used to indicate the recommended degree of force, but I still think it’s ludicrous), and how we should physically abuse (it is abuse) our pre-teen children because police and school can’t make them behave on our behalf, I think I should be allowed to express my own emotions. You used a pretty emotional tone yourself in your previous post on this thread. Keeping this in mind, the violence of your intervention is, I think, unwarranted.

If you don’t know your children well enough by age 8 to find something non-violent that they will find punishing and you don’t have enough respect to enforce rules or any punishment except spanking then you have already failed. I suggest if you ever rely on spanking to wean yourself from it as soon as possible.

Here is the crux of matters… I see things like this:

…and I see things like this:

And all I can think is, HOW DARE YOU make judgments on how I choose to raise my child!

To tell me that I need to “re-evaluate my views,” as if I never gave it the consideration it deserved to begin with… In fact, to literally tell FarTreker that his or her views need to be re-evaluated after a lengthy post that was indicative of someone who has put much thought into this… To tell me that I have “failed” to know my kids and that I need to “wean (sic) myself” from disciplining my children… I mean, that takes unadulterated NERVE.

You don’t want to spank your kids? Don’t. I have never ONCE said, “You SHOULD spank your kids,” and I do not profess to tell you YOU ARE WRONG to not do so. I do not plan on going around spanking your kids for you, and I don’t think anyone advocated this in this thread.

I WILL tell you that I choose differently, and as many studies as you show that says corporal punishment is bad, I can show cites that say otherwise, and most importantly, I KNOW who I am and I WILL KNOW my kids and YOU DO NOT!

So you don’t want to hit your little precious bundles of joy, fine. I hope that they never need it, I hope if push comes to shove your convictions remain intact (reality and the heat of the moment have a funny way of changing people’s perceptions of these things), and I hope that your kids all grow up to be wonderful people who better the world we all have to share.

But - I repeat - don’t tell me I need to “re-evaluate” my views or that I have to be “weaned” from anything and especially don’t you DARE tell me what I can and can’t do with my kids.

Dig?


Yer pal,
Satan

[sub]TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
Four months, two weeks, 1 hour, 23 minutes and 43 seconds.
5442 cigarettes not smoked, saving $680.29.
Life saved: 2 weeks, 4 days, 21 hours, 30 minutes.[/sub]

"Satan is not an unattractive person."-Drain Bead
[sub]Thanks for the ringing endorsement, honey!*[/sub]

FarTreker

Well there’s a set of unimpeachable sources for you. I can find “many books and articles and journals and reports defending” practically any proposition, including the one that holds that the Earth is flat, to which I could add the testimony of my own senses based on the fact that I don’t perceive any curvature to the Earth’s surface. I can instance radio and television programs, movies, and video games that might well seem to bear out this proposition as well. However, if I limit my set of evidence to scientifically valid measurements and observations, the flat-Earth poition is untenable.

Likewise, I don’t doubt that you see lots of undisciplined, disrepectful, intolerably rude kids out there. I also don’t doubt that you perceive a decline over the last several decades in the number of parents who spank their kids. Post hoc non ergo propter hoc, however. What studies there are that have controlled for the effect of parental socioeconomic status, parental tendency to violence, genetic influence, and other variables have failed to establish any correlation between spanking as a disciplinary method and behavior. Kids who’re spanked appear to be marginally more likely to be violent, but only marginally so. The important point to me is that they are no more likely to behave either better or worse as a result of spanking. There’s no correlation either way. That being so, I’d rather invest my parental energies in disciplinary strategies that are at least somewhat more likely to be beneficial. I’d also rather not introduce fear and humiliation into a relationship that needs to be predicated on respect and love.

If I may be permitted the liberty of paraphrasing other parts of your message instead of quoting, you seem to concede that very small children may respond to disciplinary methods other than spanking, but say that as they get older discipline problems become more frequent, making it necessary to spank them in order to prevent them from talking back, being rude, sneaking out with their friends, screwing the scumbag down the street, etc. When is this spanking to take place? When they’re younger and less of a problem and other methods work (as you seem to concede), on the principle that you’re going to need them to remember you having hit them unnecessarily when they were younger?

Oh, what the hell, let’s quote.

Excuse me, but didn’t you say yesterday that it makes you want to puke when you see a parent trying to reason with a four-year-old? Today, however, you concede that it’s an effective strategy. Still need to spank the little bastards, though, because when they get older they get more difficult.

Well, apparently you are going to use:

Oh. I see. I’ll be watching with interest to see how you fare applying that strategy in your relationship with your teenage children.

I thought you said that spankings were an effective way to prevent kids from turning into “mouthy, rebellious teens”; either your dad didn’t ever spank you, or you didn’t turn into “mouthy, rebellious teens”, or (and my money’s still on this one) the spankings didn’t make any difference one way or the other.

Your posts really don’t present an apology for spanking so much as a rant against rude, disrepectful, undisciplined kids. I sympathize completely with your dismay; I just don’t agree that the answer is to employ a disciplinary strategy that’s no more likely to work than doing a “discipline dance” in a forest clearing by the light of the full moon. I want parents to do the hard work of figuring out what really works to discipline their kids, and then do the even harder work of demonstrating the discipline required on their own part to follow through with it. I want them to take the time to teach children how they should behave instead of simply swatting them when they’re annoying. I want them, having taught their children how to behave, to demand and expect respectful, polite, and appropriate behavior and to consistently impose appropriate consequences when the kids misbehave. I want the parents to behave in a respectful, polite, and appropriate manner instead of acting like spoiled brats themselves and smacking their kids when they do the same. Tell me where I’m off base in that.

Satan
Statements like:

aren’t nearly as offending as mine, I gather.

I can’t figure what it is that makes you this angry at me. If anything, I think FarTreker should have straightened me out, if he felt a need to. So much for spokesmanship.

I was genuinely interested in your opinions, and I was considerate in my few posts I had the occasion to address to you so far. I also used to enjoy a lot being here, on SDMB. However, since a veteran lays his heavy hand on me out of the blue, with all the weight of his 4298 posts, I guess I’m in the wrong place.

(FarTreker: Sorry again. I wasn’t trying to drag you into a flame war, but I needed to cite you in what I thought was a relevant context.)

Good point, lambda. I disagree with that aspect of his post and had I not glossed over it and missed it, I would have called him on it.

I am also sorry if you think I got heavy-handed with you. However, I have a problem with doing what I feel you are trying to do, and Lee did too, as evidenced by the quotes I pulled from you both.

Telling someone how to raise their kids (except for cases of obvious abuse) is wrong no matter what you are telling them to do or how well-intentioned you are.

Now then, are you suggesting that you SHOULD be able to tell me how to raise my children? What about you, Lee? Anyone? Bueller?


Yer pal,
Satan

[sub]TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
Four months, two weeks, 2 hours, 26 minutes and 2 seconds.
5444 cigarettes not smoked, saving $680.51.
Life saved: 2 weeks, 4 days, 21 hours, 40 minutes.[/sub]

"Satan is not an unattractive person."-Drain Bead
[sub]Thanks for the ringing endorsement, honey!*[/sub]

Rackensack did such a fine job on his post that I have little to say. :slight_smile: As I have noted, in my research I have found that the weight of the evidence supports that spanking is at best no more effective than other methods of punishment, and often detrimental. I’m going to put my money where my mouth is, and post some studies. Sure, you can find some that support spanking, but as a general rule, even when corrected for social status, degree of punishment, parental relationship, etc., spanking does not end up looking like a big winner. I’ve done more reading than these I have quoted, certainly; as I mentioned, my mother taught psych and child psych, so I’ve had a library full of books on child-rearing to read, not to mention to empirical first-hand evidence of the fine job Mom did on me myself and my bro’. :wink: But this is the stuff I could find offhand online.

http://www.cei.net/~rcox/areview.html
“…retrospective studies all found that violent and aggressive adults recall receiving more physical punishment than do their nonaggressive counterparts. Of ten cross-sectional studies examining a child’s aggressiveness and his/her exposure to physical punishment, seven found a positive, linear relationship, two found no relationship, and one found a negative relationship. Thus, while much of the retrospective and cross-sectional data favors the hypothesis of a positive, linear relationship between physical punishment and aggression, support is not universal…”

“…in summary, then, five of the seven prospective studies offer a quantitative design. The two qualitative studies of clinical populations found that most aggressive individuals had histories of parental physical punishment. In contrast, the five quantitative studies offer mixed results. Two (Johannesson, 1977, and Sears, 1961) found no evidence for a relationship between physical punishment and aggression or attitudes towards aggression. Three others (Lefkowitz, Eron, Walder, & Huesmann, 1977; McCord, 1979; Singer, Singer, & Rapaczynski, 1984) found a positive relationship between physical punishment and later aggressive behavior. No studies noted a negative relationship.”

" Straus (1983) considered, cross-sectionally, a group of several thousand children ranging from three to 17 years of age. He interviewed their parents as part of the 1975 National Family Violence Survey, which assessed for both physical punishment (e.g., slapping) and child abuse (e.g., hitting with a closed fist). He then compared the rates of aggression between children whose parents had only used physical punishment and children whose parents had used physical punishment and abusive violence. The results noted that aggression was much more common in abused children, when compared to physically punished children. However, physically punished children (while not as aggressive as abused children), were more aggressive than children whose parents used neither physical punishment nor abusive violence."

“Lefkowitz, Walder, and Eron (1963) compared mean aggression scores between children whose parents refrained from using physical punishment, children whose parents had only used physical punishment once annually, and children whose parents used more than one type of physical punishment annually (resulting in more frequent physical punishment). He found that the crucial distinction in mean aggression lay between the “no physical punishment” children and the other children, implying that any (even very infrequent) use of physical punishment serves to increase aggression in children. Similarly, Eron (1982) found a linear relationship between low, medium, and high physical punishment and peer-nominated aggression in children, implying a difference between the “low”- and “medium” -punished children.”

“Larzelere’s (1986) results also suggest support for this conclusion. He used Straus’ (1983) data to compare children’s aggression based on the frequency with which their parents used spanking. He found that regardless of the age of the child, parents who spanked their children frequently (20 plus times a year) had children who were more aggressive with their siblings than did parents who spanked their children moderately (6 times a year) or parents who spanked their children minimally (once a year).”

Spank your adolescent, not talk to them?:

“Larzelere (1986) studied the interaction of physical punishment and parental use of discussion in his cross-sectional study. In preadolescents and adolescents, “the combination of frequent spanking and minimal discussion was particularly associated with frequent aggression””

Larzelere, R. (1986). “Moderate Spanking: Model or Deterrent of Children’s Aggression in the Family?”. Journal of Family Violence, 1(1), 27-36.

Johannesson, I. (1974). “Aggressive Behavior Among School Children Related to Maternal Practices in Early Childhood”. In J. de Wit, & W. W. Hartup (Ed.), Determinants and Origins of Aggressive Behavior (pp.413-425). The Hague: Mouton.

Sears, R. (1961). “Relation of Early Socialization Experiences to Aggression in Middle Childhood”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 466-492.

Lefkowitz, M., Eron, L., Walder, L., & Huesmann, L. (1977). Growing Up to Be Violent: A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Aggression. New York: Pergamon.

McCord, J. (1979). “Some Child-rearing Antecedents of Criminal Behavior in Adult Men”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 1477-1486.

Singer, J., Singer, D., & Rapaczynski, W. (1984). “Family Patterns and Television Viewing as Predictors of Children’s Beliefs and Aggression”. Journal of Communication, Spring, 73-89.

Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. (1990). Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Pub.

Kohn and others (Kohn, 1969; Kohn and Schooler, 1983; Straus, 1971) have argued that corporal punishment is inconsistent with the maximization of interpersonal and managerial skills. Consistent with that, Straus and Mathur (1994) found that corporal punishment was linked to a lower probability of college graduation. Moreover, of those who did graduate from college, Gimpel and Straus (1992) found that corporal punishment decreased the probability of being in the top fifth of the U.S. occupation/income distribution. Kohn (1969) suggests that parents who hope or expect their child to attend college and be employed in non-manual work occupations tend to avoid using corporal punishment, and thus provide anticipatory socialization for social roles in which what is needed is information and negotiation skills rather than physical strength and compliance with the rigid routines of the assembly line.
Published in
Frehsee, D., Horn, W., and Bussman, K. (Eds.), 1996. VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 91-105.

And just to test my vBB skills, the table I linked to before:


D E G R E E   O F   P H Y S I C A L  P U N I S H M E N T

                 Never   Rare  Moderate  Severe  Extreme
Violent inmates
at San Quentin     0       0       0        0      100%

Juvenile
Delinquents        0       2%      3%      31%      64%

High School
drop-outs          0       7%     23%      69%       0

College
freshmen           2%     23%     40%      33%       0

Professionals      5%     40%     36%      17%       0


Satan:

I sympathize with your ire, but you are in a thread debating spanking v. no spanking–if we thought neither was better or worse, we’d have little to say! :wink: I don’t rank spanking up with abuse, but I think it is a less-than-effective method of discipline–and I will say so if invited, as I tacitly have been by the OP. I respect a parent’s knowledge of their child, but I also think that many have never considered the alternatives to using physical force for discipline, and I believe that the many studies done on many parents and many children should be at least looked at seriously. We are on a public message board, in a topic about spanking–of-bloody-course we’re going to say whether we think spanking is a good idea or not! <grin> It’s not like anyone is going to beat down your door to lecture to you.

This is a discussion about spanking. I stand by my statements. I do not go up to people and tell them what to do. I have not said that no one should ever spank their child, and that should be enforced by law. I do not believe that either. Some ppl do.

I said “I suggest.” I do suggest that if you rely only on spanking that you had best find other methods as soon as possible. I suggest this here because opinions were solicited. If all you have is spanking then if that fails you have nothing. Each child is different. You should get to know your child well enough to learn and know what is punishing to them.

When my parents disciplined me in other ways such as grounding or making me write sentences, they demonstrated that I would do as they asked even if i did not like it and thought it was unfair. It made me acknowledge their authority and reinforced it.

My father spanked me once when I was a preteen. It was because my step mother had said i lied and i refused to apologize or admit it. All spanking did was demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that my father was wrong. Nothing he would do would make me change my statement. Nothing he could do would make me apologize for something I did not do. It made me angry with him and i lost a lot of respect for him.

A parent just told me this:

I only add this: Remember there are other ways of shaping behavior than punishments.

FarTreker wrote:
He had one point he assured us of as we grew into mouthy, rebellious teens, and that was that we were never too old to get hit. We listened to that, though we never tested the authority of the statement.

Please correct me if I am wrong, but what I understand you to be saying here is that you obeyed your father because you were afraid of him. You understood that he would hit you if you stepped too far out of line, and that caused you to behave in a particular way.

And yet you admit that any sort of “spanking” sufficiently painful to affect the behavior of a teenager would qualify as abuse:
Now what? How about if when you’re reasoning with the kid, he walks out on you and goes to see his friends? Are you going to grab him by the arm and forcibly restrain him? (Assault.) Spin him around and slap him? (Battery.)

So if I understand you, it was the memory of pain from when you were small enough to hit and the understanding that your father was willing to break the law to punish you that kept you in line?

This just makes no sense to me. Is an outward show of respect based on fear our only option? Is a mutual respect based on trust really that far-fetched?

You also complain about the protection that children have from adults:
The law cannot touch a kid until age 17 or 18 unless he/she commits a major crime and even then the punishment is minor. So, what do you think a kid will think knowing that his/her folks will have no way to forcibly punish him or her, that with a spoken word they can get their parents, teachers or any adult slapped in jail for sexual abuse with no actual proof, or arrested for assault with little or no proof? Plus their educators cannot lay a hand on them, even the police have to treat then differently than adults and any criminal record they get is cleared when they become legal adults. Not to mention the potential they have of being able to find a lawyer willing to sue parents and school on behalf of the kid.

So what is the answer? Do we allow teachers and other adults in our children’s lives to smack them around to keep them in line? What happens on the day after their 18th birthdays when they are suddenly afforded legal protection from assault? Will they suddenly acquire the ability to function appropriately in society without the threat of physical punishment?

Satan, I regret badly my one liner that triggered all this, where I called on others to argue my own views. Gaudere, I apologize. Also, it was downright rude of me to have phrased my opinion as an implied imperative: “you better change your mind.” I, too, get mad each time someone does that to me, even if they’re well-meaning.

This is a subject that tends to resonate rather strongly with a lot of people. While I was reading FarTreker’s post, I was literally having this image in the back of my head, of a parent hitting his kids, careful not to leave any bruises, out of frustration that no other method of comunication works, and angered that the whole society seems to conspire to undermine his parental authority. It was hard for me not to wish for a change of heart. It’s quite possible there are lurkers here who may be similarly frustrated with the way their kids respond, and who might feel re-assured by opinions like FarTreker’s. We wouldn’t be debating on a public board, if we assumed that no-one will ever go back to his/her own thoughts and, who knows, even re-evaluate them, in the light of new insights from the other participants.

But, I agree, I shouldn’t tell people what to do. I should tell people what I think, and why. So, I was well-intended, but I failed with both tactics, and manners. I expect I’ll make more mistakes, and, knowing myself, maybe some of them even twice. I don’t want to offend anyone. I’m learning.