Starving Artist: Totally Insane? Or Just Almost?

No, no, no, you don’t understand. Prior to liberalism, gay sex did not exist. In the wonderful 1950s, where everyone was classy and the whole neighborhood would get together over lemonade and cake in the clean, perfect park to lynch a black person, there was no homosexual sex of any kind.

It was liberalism that made people gay. You see, it’s not that liberalism has just allowed gay people to come out about what they’ve always been. Heavens, no. It’s that the acidic effects of liberalism, with its perverted attitudes like equality and opposition to the Vietnam War, caused men to, against their own will, stick their wangs into each other. Without liberalism, 100% of men would be straight, like in that conservative paradise of Iran. If it wasn’t for uppity liberals like Martin Luther King and Bill Clinton, Nathan Lane would be straight. He’d make Glenn Quagmire look like a piker.

Edit: Good find on those pictures, mhendo. I liked the picture of the really classy guy kicking a black guy in the face while the mob cheered. That’s so classy. And good, classy Orval Faubus. I wonder if he’s maintaining his class today while he roasts in Hell.

I’m sure black people could just have waited politely for a while longer until this sort of thing stopped on its own. It was such a genteel time, and a little civility and patience would have been preferable to all the liberal pushiness.

Unfortunately, in the half-century since that picture was taken, American culture decayed so much that the the white girl, Hazel Massery, abandoned all standards of class and decorum by publically apologizing to Elizabeth Eckford. Here’s a photo of the two in 1997, in front of Little Rock Central High School, taken by the very same photographer (Will Counts). It is appalling how far we’ve fallen as a society, isn’t it?

Another victim of the liberal scum. She looked so much much classy screaming at a defenceless teenager. Surely she was brainwashed?

Well she did appear on Oprah at one point; so I think we can take the liberal brainwashing as a given, yes.

Sadly, they had to keep on going until something like this could happen to them. But the jury understood-the kid was just provoked into acting up by those damned liberals!

I am afraid to ask (seriously), but what am I looking at in that picture. I can tell it is a man, and that something horrible has happened to his face…but that is about it.

I hope that SA finds the images posted to this thread as disturbing as I do.

As a white man from TX, I can honestly say, I am thankful to be living now and not 40 - 50 years ago when everyone was so very “civil and classy”.

And yes…I fully meant to end that first sentence with a question mark, but the Maker’s Mark prevented it. :slight_smile:

**knowing the sort of grammar Nazis we had here I felt compelled to add this post after missing my edit window.

Emmett Till.

CMC +fnord!

Holy. Shit.

That poor kid was 14. I have a son that age.

Ignorance fought, but some part of me wishes I still had it. :frowning:

The men who did it to him (for the crime of being sassy to a white woman) were acquitted by an all-white jury and died a natural death decades later. So much for civility, eh?

That article gave me an undeniable urge to hug my son and tell him that I love him. Now his mom is reading this thread. She’s not a SD regular, but I told her she had to read it to understand.

So, anyway…SA, any comments on your age of enlightenment that you long for?

I think you have me confused with someone else. AFAIK I haven’t posted in any of the Acorn threads and really don’t have any position on the subject one way or the other. Certainly I don’t recall ‘ranting’ about it…nor picking up the ball that Bricker dropped.

Sorry to interrupt this regularly scheduled pitting…this was merely a test of the ‘what the hell are you on about’ broadcasting system. Had this been an actual WTF moment you would have been directed to provide a ‘cite?’…but since this was merely a test we will now return you to this highly entertaining pitting.

Thanks for your support! And I appreciate Hentor’s earlier kind words to me that I am the boards ‘Cruiser’…who I assume was a less than popular poster by Hentor’s generous tone.

-XT

The idea that we should’ve slowed civil rights progress in order to hold on to some perceived “civility” is one of the most vile ideas I’ve read on this board. Even if it did cost us some “civility” (an idea that I don’t really buy), that’s a small price to pay. I’d make that sacrifice every fucking time.

I’m reminded of Dick Gregory’s line:

“Get your foot off my Grandmother’s neck! NOW, Godamnit, not one toe at a time!”

“History is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.”

CMC +fnord!
It should be noted that lynching was considered a good, clean, family friendly, public event … as evidenced by these 81 photographs and postcards (you read that right, there was a time in the pre-liberal destruction America that it was perfectly acceptable to send family and friends photo-postcards of burned, castrated and lynched Black people. :eek::(:mad:).

Those who long for “the good ol’ days” are obliged to remember them in their totality.

Mad animal
Man’s a mad animal
I’m a thousand years old and in my time I’ve helped commit a million murders
The earth is spread
The earth is spread, thick with squashed human guts
We few survivors
We few survivors walk over a quaking bog of corpses
Always under our feet, every step we take
Rotted bones, ashes, matted hair, under our feet
Broken teeth, skulls split open
Mad animal
I’m a mad animal …

I don’t suppose it’s ocurred to you that the only people around here saying that it should have been slowed are lefties who first claim that fucking up society was necessary in order to accomplish equality, and then claim that to have gone about it in a more reasonable manner would have slowed the process. This is then followed by claims that that was what I wanted.

The really annoying thing about all that isn’t so much that it’s completely erroneous, but that blacks had pretty much already accomplished equality…or at least had set all the necessary wheels in motion (government-protected demonstrations, judicial rulings, etc.)…before white liberals began to get involved and decided to include it as part of their fucking up of the country.

Soitenly!

Those photos do not typify societal behavior of that time. Even today there exists plenty of people who are capable of the same type of behavior, and they no more define society at large than the people in the photos above did.

It’s amusing to note that of all the ills I’ve lain at the feet of liberalism, virtually all the attention gets paid to my comments about societal crassness and everyone acts like I’d gladly trade the worst of yesteryear for a few polite manners. This is not only false, but IMO it’s a deliberate attempt to trivialize and marginalize my complaints about the damage the left has done to this society over the last forty years.

Do you think the people depicted in those photos suffered? Do you think their family members and loved ones suffered because of what happened to them? If so, I can tell you that the pain and suffering caused by wrongheaded liberalism over the last forty years is worse by many thousandfold.

How many people have been brutally killed, and how many of their family members’ and loved ones’ lives have been made miserable by, slayings committed by gangs whose existence is defended on the grounds of anti-racism? (It’s perfectly alright to outlaw the Klan, but man you better keep your keep your damn racist hands off the Crips and the Bloods.)

How many people have died, and how many of their family members’ and loved ones’ lives have been ruined because of drugs and their concomitant problems, which can often include crime, gangsterism, beatings and killings? (And this doesn’t take into account the more minor but still important question involving all the people who have been robbed or had their houses broken into by druggies looking for stuff they could sell or pawn for drug money. I hardly know anyone who hasn’t been robbed or had things stolen at some point over the years for precisely that reason.)

And how many perfectly viable - and, for all we know, feeling - little babies, who’ve had absolutely no say so in their own creation - have been ripped into pieces by abortions performed in the name of allowing women to ‘choose’ what to do with their ‘own’ bodies? (A most laughable argument if ever there was one.)

How many people have been raped, tortured, and/or murdered…and how many of their family members and loved ones have had their lives ruined…by criminals let loose by liberal judges and correctional systems who went through a period of blaming crime on the injustices caused by society, and whose policies finally became so outrageous that the country finally had to enact three-strikes laws in an effort to keep criminals in jail?

So you see, the pain and suffering caused by wrongheaded liberal dipshitism outweighs by far the pain and suffering caused by racists of the fifties…and by many orders of magnitude, IMO.

And now we come down to the more minor issue of societal crassness. Just the other day I was in the neighborhood Wal-Mart looking at magazines (along with women, kids, etc. when a couple of young guys passed behind me talking in a perfectly loud, conversational voice how he told some motherfucker to stick something up his ass. This was only a day or two after I witnessed a young mother in a nice neighborhood out in her yard talking on her cell phone while her two young children played in the drive. If I tell you that ‘asshole’, ‘fuck’, and ‘fucker’ made up 50% of her vocabulary, it would not be much of an exaggeration. Then there was the time when I pulled up to a stoplight next to a good-looking young blond of the cheerleader type in a Mustang convertible, tapping her finger on the steering wheel along with music she had blaring from her car to the effect of “Get down on your knees and suck my badass dick”. And if I had a dollar for every time some dipshit refused to dim his brights or tailgated me even though I was already going five or ten miles an hour over the speed limit, or either refused to let me change lanes or merge into traffic, I’d be a very rich guy indeed.

None of these things have emanated from the influence of the right, I can guarantee you.

And Equipoise, your most recent posts convinces me more than ever that trying to answer the ‘game’ that you proposed would have been a waste of time. So, just for the record…nah, I don’t think I’ll play.

Although I will say that if I time-travelling ability and the power to change whatever I wanted in the past, I would do two things and none of the above mentioned liberal bullshit would have liberal bullshit whose consequence have infested this society over the last forty years would have happened. They are as follows:

  1. I would keep John Kennedy from being killed.

This would have kept Johnson’s inept hands off the controls and most likely prevented the escalation of the war and the incredibly wasteful (in terms of lives lost) pulled-punches way in which it was fought.

  1. I would prevent the rise of the Beatles and the British invasion that followed in their wake.

It was in the wake of the Beatles that the fad for long hair (which tomndebb mentioned upthread) and oddball clothing took root and set the huge baby-boom generation against the ‘Establishment’…as it was called back then…and the resentment they felt over their treatment by society is the true genesis of the idea that everything about society as it existed then had to go…up to and including civility and decent behavior.

These people then found a rallying point in the Vietnam war, which had gone to shit thanks to the Johnson administration’s handling of it, and we were off to the races.

Flower-power, the anti-war movement, tree-hugging, the eager adoption of drug use, the so-called sexual revolution, etc., ensued. It was also at this time that the left belatedly began to embrace civil rights (and feminism) and to develop their tactic of using hate-speech (racist, bigot, male chauvinist pig, etc.) anytime anyone said anything they didn’t like, no matter how reasonable.

And of course, it didn’t take long for Democratic politicians to begin to pander to these people - who were suddenly coming of age to vote - and to appoint judges who began to legislate from the bench and circumvent the process for change to the constitution through amendments.

And thus we get to where we are today and very little of it is good. But the toothpaste is out of the tube and we can’t put it back in. Insead, all we Right-thinking[sup]TM[/sup] citizens can do is vote Republican to try to keep things from getting even more fucked up…and which is why, despite accusations from the left that I am ‘teh EVIILLL’ for doing so, I will be voting for McCain next month.

Well, at least nobody is going make the mistake of confusing you with any type of intellectual.

Oh, horseshit!

Or perhaps you can come up with some sort of cite that among the hundreds of millions of American citizens at the time, most thought it was good, clean family fun.

It’s ridiculous assertions like this that make this board’s motto a laughingstock.

Well, if you assert it, then it must be true. Count me among the convinced.

Let me get this straight, because surely i must be missing something.

If you were suddenly transformed into an omnipotent being, with the power to travel into past and change anything you wanted, your first and only priorities would be to prevent Kennedy’s assassination and prevent the rise of the Beatles?

Wow.

That’s about all the response i can muster. Just when i thought that you couldn’t surprise me any more, you’ve gone and done it again.

Why should anyone take your request for citations seriously, when you’ve made very clear that you are unwilling to pay any heed whatsoever to them?

You’ve said before, and again in this thread, that you are perfectly willing to completely dismiss attempts to provide evidence, because anyone can find evidence that supports their point of view.

And why should anyone take seriously your complaints about “ridiculous assertions,” when every argument you make is nothing but a string of loosely-connected assertions with no basis in reality?

I have nothing against you being a conservative. I really don’t even have any problem with you holding onto all of your historical delusions. But you could try, at least, not to be so hypocritical.