Notice you ignored the part about sexual assault not requiring actual intercourse.
You realize of course that doesn’t mean it’s factually sexual assault. It merely means that the state’s legislature, as is typical for California, has embraced the liberal agenda on the issue and formulated its laws to comply with that politically correct interpretation.
Unlike you i can admit when I am wrong. I did look up Pennsylvania law And it does in fact require intercourse. Doesn’t change the fact that you are in fact detestable. If only you had looked it up you could have made an irrelevant point.
Yeah, those damned liberals! How dare they try to prevent women from being groped against their will!
He did something comparable in the Paterno thread. I called it “lying by specificity”.
What the hell do you mean by factually sexual assault? Do you suggest that there is some universal definition not based on statutory law? You are an idiot.
But, but…I thought you were ignoring that part of my yadayada blathering.
Guinny, Guinny, Guinny.…I knew perfectly well what she said. But she was talking about what happened in the sixties and given that I felt it was unlikely her BROTHER, had to sign for her I figured it was a typo. Maybe I was wrong, but its…wait for it…trivial, even if so.
Gah, you are such a moron! Stop trying to play the outrage card, you really aren’t very good at it. In the first place you’re leaping to the presumption once again that I was trying to speak for “women” when it should be obvious to anyone with even a semblance of a brain that I was speaking for myself and giving my own opinion, and further, if anyone, black, white, man, woman, child or beast, tries to tell me a kiss or a hand on a clothed body somewhere other than the genital area is sexual assault I’m gonna roll my eyes at 'em.
Note to anyone who wants to castigate me for spelling grammar or consistency, I only post here when drunk…
There are worse things…like being falsely accused of rape.
Which I haven’t heard you say a word against.
It shows.
Not yet. It gets worse. But never rises to your level of stupidity.
And now I’ve got to leave as I have worthwhile stuff to do. I can’t believe I’ve been wasting what little free time I have with the likes of Guinastasia, of all people. I’m beginning to think I may be a moron after all.
The fact that you don’t realize how stupid that is proves I’m smarter drunk than you are sober.
What do ya know SA speaks truth for once.
No the fact that you can’t figure out what it means proves you’re not particularly bright when you’re drunk. I guess we’ll have to wait till you sober up to find out if you can suss it out then. It really isn’t a difficult concept to grasp, especially since I already posted the information necessary to explain it.
But enough jousting with drunks and dummies and outraged dingbats. I’m out.
Wait as long as you like, I already said I only post here when drunk. You seem to think there is some universal definition of sexual assault. I posted California’s definition. Which does not conform to yours, unlike you, California is a constitutionally recognized state that has the power to define terms like sexual assault. Just because you disagree does not make touching a kids ass not sexual assault in California.
Moron.
The fuck, it’s worse.
Mere accusation worse than actual assault? You really are just a worthless arse-wen, aren’t you?
You do realize we can see you’re still online, right?
I know you left your computer signed on but you had more important things to do, despite what your posting history reveals…
Wanna compare posting history to see who’s less invested?