Steam to begin offering refunds!

Cite.

You have to get the refund within 14 days of purchasing the game (or release in the case of pre-orders) and you have to have less than two hours of playtime on the game.

This is really great news.* Like other digital sellers that offer a refund system, they reserve the right to decide if you’re “abusing” the system and cut you off from refunds altogether, but they specifically say that it’s not abuse if a game you’ve purchased goes on sale and you get a refund so that you can re-purchase it at the lower price.

*probably really bad news for my wallet, since it means I’ll buy more games that I’m on the fence about.

I hate to use the phrase “game-changer”, but it’s pretty big.

It will be a godsend to the uber-power-gamers who think they’ve failed if they don’t complete a game in 90 minutes. :smiley:

Nice!

This is great news!

What game is it changing, exactly? :stuck_out_tongue:

Seriously, I dunno. I don’t think this is actually that big a deal. It’ll be nice to give people a chance to reject their crappy pre-ordered titles when they ship buggy as hell, but it’s not really going to affect ME at all.

For one thing, it might spell the end of the atrociously bad cash grabs/frauds like Bad Rats or the Slaughtering grounds.

Check this out: http://youtu.be/VfI7pAaOH9c

There’s an unbelievable amount of down right terrible crap on the Steam storefront trying to fool you out of your money.

That’s really good. Their no refunds policy was one of the shittier things that the average gamer would run into.

Sorry, but if you can’t tell that those games are awful by the videos and the reviews, I don’t actually feel like you deserve your money back. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Maybe I don’t deserve it back, but that developer sure as shit doesn’t deserve it. Maybe donate the money to a charity?

Touche. Though if that’s the end goal, maybe they’d be better off with a more aggressive screening process.

Honestly, I think this is a great solution to the problem. Game developers are on notice that if their games are so shitty that nobody’s willing to play them for more than two hours, Steam isn’t going to work out for them. Why do we need a different solution to the problem?

You’re conflating “doesn’t affect ME at all” with “doesn’t affect the MARKET at all.”

You may have risen above the petty and base concerns of the plebeian masses, but putting more agency in the hands of the buyer creates a more robust marketplace, and that benefits ALL consumers.

It’s not just the customers that were effected. Lots of good games get buried under the mounds of bullshit that Steam spews out daily. With refunds those out to cheat people will go away giving developers that have confidence in their product a bigger chance to get noticed.

I consider this rather optimistic.

I’m not saying this is a bad thing, I’m just saying I don’t think it’s going to change much.

What it will change is if you buy a game you don’t like you can get your money back. That is enough.

I wish this would be retroactive for those of us who bought games only to realize that the damn things don’t even work.

And Airk is likely still stuck in 2014, not bothering to notice that the client is now identical to this.

I don’t think they want millions of users purge their libraries of every copy of a game they didn’t like (or games that didn’t work) in one huge deluge of negative profit. I mean, I’d love it too as a consumer, I just don’t see it happening.

They are currently making exceptions to the stated limits.

If you really want something refunded, submit a request. It may be granted. I know a few peopel who got their money back om games as old as early 2014 (these are all games they never played or played under the 2 hour limit though).

Turns out the game I’ve been having so much trouble with was free.
:smack: