It would seem that making special allowances for tests misses the whole point of testing. If I’m testing a group of kids, I want to know which of those kids learned the most and can use that knowledge under standard conditions.
If we aren’t going to use standardized conditions then what is the point? Kid X gets a good grade under the usual conditions while Kid Y gets the same grade but needs twice as long or a private room or whatever. Which kid learned the most and can use it under a small amount of pressure?
If the test isn’t going to tell us this then why bother, simply declare them all as having passed and be done with it.
It seems like accommodation to this-that-and-the other “special” needs is extremely unfair to those who don’t get the extra time or private rooms or have the thing read to them.
Alternatively, why not just build a “special ed” version of the SATs, MCATs or whatever? Call them SE-MCATs or SE-SATs and report them to the college or employer or whoever needed the info. We could then extend all the accommodation anyone wished, allow open books, calculators, private rooms or whatever. Others who don’t need the special treatment could take the real-deal. Of course, if someone took the special ed version, that would have to be reported. This would probably stop most of the people gaming the system.
Regards
Testy