True, but it sure does bring a thread down. Shodan did post “Even when the reason given are ridiculous” (sic), but that doesn’t say anything about when the reason is not ridiculous.
I do not remember that stipulation in that thread. Back up that claim, or I call bullshit.
The effect is not so much a matter of “stipulation” so much as having a target rich environment. Ever since the inmates took over the asylum, batshit policy suggestions lie thick upon the ground.
For the most part, yeah. It’s not a laundry list of scandals, but of legislative proposals.
I don’t know what posts you’re referring to, but a few execptions of Republicans saying stupid things doesn’t really alter my point. If you want to make a list of Democraic scandals, use a different thread title. Weinergate was not a “Democratic idea.”
No doubt you can point to the place where I said Bush should be taken to task for flouting the War Powers Act.
Then why does free republic exist?
It’s in the thread title. It’s also simply descriptiove of the thread. I’ll take this protest as an admission that you can’t produce anything anlalogous to the rich tapestry of ideological gibbering that we see on the right.
Nice fucking try. So the thread title should be: Hey! Let’s bring up old news and flog the dems with it? I thought this was for new and improved peccadillos.
Shit, they done cross-bred chickens and armadillos? And how did they improve them, teach them how to breathe?
In the quoted post, Gyrate fails to object to any specific point raised by Shodan. Lacking a “that” that doesn’t count, that one doesn’t count.
This comment included because I can’t decide whether I need a line or a smiley to point out that the irony in the previous paragraph is the entire point of this post.
Jesus. This thread is not about “Democratic ideas”. It’s about stupid things Democrats are doing. Most of the people pretending not to understand the distinction have participated in the Republican thread, and didn’t have a problem with it then.
Let me simplify: based on the course the other thread took, if a Democrat says or does it, it counts.
Those who didn’t read the other thread, or haven’t for a long time have a good excuse. Most of you don’t.
Since the GOP thread includes stupid things Republican politicians have said and done outside of legislative proposals I see no problem with posting anything of the sort.
Or just post whatever you want. Jeebus.
I agree. There’s an ongoing thread about bad Republicans, so why shouldn’t there be one about bad Democrats?
Please explain how my observation regarding the common practice of tu quoque by conservatives, here, and Mr. Moto in particular (who has raised it to an art form), is in any way my saying that Weiner’s weiner doesn’t count.
I’d not consider it an “idea” as such, but I would certainly count it as a dumb thing done by a Democrat. In that regard, I highly endorse the reference to Jeanine from Ghostbusters. If there was a klaxon for you to sound, I’d make sure you personally could hit the button.
I think it’s a question of appropriateness and distraction. A democrat did something stupid. Someone opened a thread about it. Posting “but, but, but, conservative posters here are poopyheads” in that thread, even if you are making a cogent and well argued point about specific conservative poster who is being a poopyhead, is exactly the kind of “but, wait, look over there! Clinton got a blowjob!” BS that we complain about when conservatives do it.
There are plenty of other interesting side debates to have here about the various levels of offense and hypocrisy committed by Weiner vs various Republicans, or the actions of Mr Moto, but when someone starts a thread whose basic point is “Weiner did something bad”, trying to start one of those side debates just seems like refusal to accept that your guy did something bad by obfuscating the issue.
Oh, and Diogenese, you’re totally full of it. This is precisely in the “Stupid Republican Idea of the Day” wheelhouse, with reversed party affiliation. Sure, there are plenty of more substantive actual-issues posts in that thread, but this would be totally unremarkable there.
Oh, and for the record, Weiner acted like a douche bag. I condemn his actions.
I tend to agree with you here. The GOP thread has plenty of similar events posted within it. I wish you luck in creating a competing thread, others have failed miserably in the past. The GOP thread is at over 3000 posts so far with this post you’re up to 56
I think the GOP really does just have more stupid ideas. But if your thread keeps going as it is with 50 false equivalency posts for every stupid idea you might just get a competing post count.
I’ll put arguing Wieners actions aren’t valid for a ‘stupid Democrat idea’ is itself a stupid idea.
As do I, we must have some concern for the brutal psychological trauma visited upon his victims.
That’s not a particularly fair description of the evolution of things here, but so be it. I do not want to distract. Please focus all your attention on Wiener.
Must…resist…straight line. Must…resist…
The House recognizes the Honorable Member from New York.