Good idea.
Maybe you can get squared away on the difference between cable and radio.
Speaking as a furry…
Has anyone studied the correlation between political orientation and Myers-Briggs Types? SDMB is swamped with INTJ’s far out of proportion to the population. (This often bites me as I tend toward INTP-Perceptive rather than INTJ-Judgemental.)
Creep.
It’s getting close to time for D’Anconia to be put out of his misery …
What about Hentor, and Grandpa Pat? They accuse me of not knowing the difference between a newspaper and a columnist, yet, Hentor doesn’t know the difference between a cable tv station and radio.
I guess if libs are stupid, it’s ok and accepted, around here. :smack:
Maybe you should stop posting until you’ve been weaned.
Are you sitting on the pie?
[Lenny] "Tell me again about the bunny feet, George. [/Lenny]
On the Washington Post Op-Ed webpage today, you can read George Will, Michael Chertoff, Carly Fiorina, Jennifer Rubin, Marc Thiessen, Michael Gerson, and Charles Krauthammer, and of course the editor is Fred Hiatt. That’s an awful lot of conservatives (and several former Bush administration officials) for a “liberal” paper.
BunnGhazi
Or potentially WatershipDownGate
With regards to the massage study, I will say that while it doesn’t seem like a complete waste of time, it does come from what may be the single most egregious and obvious wastes of money in the US: the National Center For Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NCCAM. An organization that has wasted taxpayer dollars examining, among other things:
- Acupuncture
- Homeopathy
- Reiki
- Prayer (AKA “Western Reiki”)
- Chelation Therapy
- Colonic Cleansing
…In other words, it’s essentially spending taxpayer dollars to push bad science.
That said, this study seemed at least somewhat reasonable. So yeah. Broken clocks and whatnot.
They should be the easiest group to fund. Chuck a penny into a swimming pool - boom, Homoeopathic money bin to spend on whatever they want.
It gets even worse when you consider what Tom Harkin, one of its foremost cheerleaders, has to say about it proving many “alternative” therapies meritless. Spoiler warning: he’s not happy about it.
… bunny feet?
I’m not sure if you missed his first post or if you’re just slightly dumbfounded at the inanity. So there’s the link for the former and if it’s the latter, I hope you don’t mind if I join you. o_O
<golf clap>
Although I suppose it they demonstrated that none of this stuff works and thus shouldn’t be included in government funded healthcare, it would end up being a net win.
They aren’t exactly pushing bad science. Check out their page on Homeopathy.
Actually given the fact that these pseudo science treatments aren’t going away it makes sense to study them so that
-
You can definitively show that they don’t do anything. Hopefully putting to rest the idea that it is only the close mindedness of the medical community that is preventing the cure to cancer. Also you need to provide a counter ballance for non-placebo controlled poorly designed studies published in vanity journals by the treatments proponents,.
-
You can determine whether the alternative treatments might actually be harmful.
-
There is always the chance that the 2,000 years of tradition might actually have been on to something and that it might be possible to turn one of the treatments from alternative medicine into actual medicine.