Can anybody explain to me exactly (or even approxiamately) what a poll like this proves, how the information will be used and if anybody with an IQ over 35 would give any credence to the results?
I know what it hopes to achieve - but by doing it as a poll, they hope to use the results somehow right? Anybody using these results to support an argument or make any decisisons may as well go looking for a gas leak with a candle…
I have to agree. The Republican party’s branding is up front and very clear. The most deceptive thing I can see that they can do with this is to trumpet “X% of Americans think Y!” The polled themselves certainly aren’t being deceived.
And I have a feeling that the object of the “poll” is not so much to measure public opinion as to raise the potential donor’s FUD level to the point that he/she digs that much deeper into his/her dwindling resources in order to help stave off the SocialistCommunistLiberalFascist Apocalypse that looms on the horizon. . . .
Selected “No” on every question, with the exception of the ones about whether he voted in the last three elections.
He punted on the Registration Number and voting District Code (selected plausible-looking character strings from the last bit in the address bar: /?initiativekey=F5BMW17GUXCG), so it might not make it through the verification process.
Oh, and his address appears to be at some state University in Maryland.
ETA: He also declined to make a donation to the RNC.
I see that if you make a donation, you get to see the results. I wonder if they track ip or similiar. It would be quite fun to do a “google bomb” type experiment on them and see just how far the results could be skewed by a populace like those here (everybody posting replies for an hour solid has gotta a good number of responses right?)
My submission today is S.C Republican Party County Chairmen Edwin Merwin (Bamberg County) and James Ulmer (Orangeburg), wrote in a letter to the editor of The Times and Democrat (the Orangeburg, SC paper) that Senator James DeMint was like a Jew “watching our nation’s pennies.”
I mentioned this to my wife yesterday. She, not believing that someone could be so dumb, thought that maybe they were going for some obscure biblical reference. Yeah - They could only wish. They went straight for the offensive stereotype.
I don’t understand how that’s an offensive stereotype. Isn’t frugality and financial planning a good thing? And doesn’t the letter suggest Jews are good? Do you mean it’s offensive because it suggests non-Jews are inferior? Because, I mean… they just are.
So the Republican Jewish Coalition said that, which means he’s wrong and I’m right? Or is he right because he’s a Jew and jews are superior? In which case I agree with you and him because that is true.
I still don’t see how it’s offensive. I thought you were supposed to hate Republicans, not be offended by them.
He also took John Grisham over William Faulkner. Yeah, people will be flocking to see his birthplace one day.
One, it’s not necessarily a good stereotype; one man’s sound financial planner is another man’s skinflint. Anyway, racial stereotypes are always offensive, regardless of whether or not they’re “good ones”.
Ask a Southeast Asian guy if he likes it when people assume he knows calculus.
The executive director of the RJC is right because historical facts are on his side - the tightfistedness of Jews is an offensive stereotype born of medieval persecution. It’s rarely seen as a complimentary personality trait, and using it as such is not considered in the best of taste.
This sounded so crazy I went to the online website and looked, and sweet Jews for Jesus, there was the proof. And now they’ve written apology letters. One just kind of apologizes and shuts up, and the other dumber one talks about hearing it as a child and meaning it as a compliment, etc.
That’s an excellent point. Like, I was just pointing out to some black people how I’m like blacks because I’ve got rhythm, and you’d think I’d said something offensive! I mean, having rhythm’s a good thing, right?