Because your mother raped a goat in sexual desperation to produce your mouth breathing, intolerant bigoted, herpes infected, Jesus horse, flat earth society, so dark aged you haven’t discovered fire, and down right just plain stupid ass. I’ll make thjs simple.
Gay humans, are human.
So says a US Judge.
Hopefully this leads to the return of SSM, and helps set precedent for the rest of the country, but my reading of article seems to indicate it’s partially based on CA law so may not be relevant.
In conclusion bigots, go fuck your whore mother in her aids cunt.
PS: mods could someone add a (gay marriage ban overturned) to the title? I forgot it in a throw of passion composing the thread.:smack:
Nobody who isn’t a simpering bigoted asshole cares.
Also, human rights aren’t supposed to be put to a popular vote. Anyone that thinks so is an un-American sack of shit. The judge did what the founders put him there for. He overturned a bullshit, unconstitutional law.
If this is indeed legislating from the bench (and I can’t say for certain it is or isn’t) then you are correct - I don’t care. I have no problem with the courts overturning clearly unconstitutional laws.
Should I presume you would have supported Virginia in the Loving case? If not, what makes this any different? I’m not being snarky. I’d honestly like an answer.
Nothing important, just a ), but I reckon that happened because the title is too long with the ), and given my history of typos, I think it fits something I posted better anyway.
See, we keep hearing this in Iowa, too, where same-sex marriage has actually been legal for about a year. “The Supreme Court judges are making laws! They can’t do that! Only the legislature can make laws! This court decision is unconstitutional!” :rolleyes:
When, in fact, the Iowa state constitution provides for equal treatment of ALL its citizens, and when the lily-livered legislature passed the law denying equal treatment of gay citizens, the state Supreme Court wisely (and unanimously, I’ll add) said … Hey, that law you just passed? Doesn’t comply with the state constitution. We’re tossing it out.
Not the same as a) legislating from the bench or 2) making any kind of law. It’s interpreting the laws as written and passed. In other words … exactly what the judicial branch is supposed to do.
Only when the ruling is something they like. The Constitution is a wonderful, all-important document which sets us apart from all other countries and makes the US the best country in the world… until it’s inconvenient, that is.
