Is superfluous really so, so much better than fluous? 

Is superfluous really so, so much better than fluous? 

Yes. I masticate to it.
And would Stevie Wonder have sung about “Stition”? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ul7X5js1vE
Too, could this thread have been cilious?
Phil
Califragilisticexpialidocious just doesn’t have the same ring to it.
Just plain natural food isn’t good enough for me.
Although ambrosia is getting pricey these days.
Would a movie called Size Me be all that interesting?
I don’t know if Nietzsche’s book Man and Man would have sold that well.
I think it would have done quite well in certain markets.
What about Man, the comic book?
On the other hand, I probably would still have watched “The Mario Bros. Show” as a kid.
Conversations like this tend to leave me gruntled.
What’s ‘supergruntled’? 

b.
I was trying to think of a lative to describe this thread, but I can’t, so I think I’ll settle on calling it duper.

This post wins the thread. 
I think it would have been funnier if it had read
Enjoy,
Steven