I have no idea what any of you are talking about but I do want to report my appreciation of the name Vandensnatch.
It’s patently either a German car or a nasty disease.
I have no idea what any of you are talking about but I do want to report my appreciation of the name Vandensnatch.
It’s patently either a German car or a nasty disease.
No argument there, but if the Tea Party people continue to embrace the tea bag as their official movement icon, they can’t complain if they get called “teabaggers”.
Hell, it’s even the self-proclaimed “unifying symbol” of their officially sponsored Tea Party jewelry:
Members of a political movement (officially the “Progressive Party”) that adopted the bull moose as their party emblem got called the Bull Moosers. Members of a political movement (officially the “American Party”, among others) that adopted the phrase “I know nothing” as their party slogan got called the Know Nothings.
So members of a political movement that adopts the teabag as their party emblem have got to expect to be called the “Teabaggers”. If they don’t like the name’s sexual connotations, then maybe they should switch their emblem to a teaspoon or a teapot or something. I’d be happy to call them the “Teapotters” or “Teaspooners” if that’s what they want on their badge.
But while they go around flaunting tea bags it’s only natural to call them “Teabaggers”. If they were too dumb to foresee that the association with tea bags might prove embarrassing, and are too pigheaded to change their icon now that it has proved embarrassing, that’s their problem.
But they are innocent of such truth, as far as they know, you’re making it all up. They are proud of their innocence/ignorance of your elitist depravity. They are not metrosexuals, they are not inclined to post-modernist irony, they haven’t the slightest knowledge of the jargon of the underground homosexual agenda, thank you very much!
Our scorn is proof positive that they are right.
Is that Dutch for “tampon”?
But … have you really tried to?
See, that would be a good way to start to convince me!
CMC fnord!
BTW Nice way to ignore the point of my post though, just attack me instead :rolleyes:.
('Specially since I don’t recall really taking a position about the “Tea Party” movement here. Though everything I’ve seen so far leaves me, well lets just say, less than impressed … at best.)
I usually get familiar with things I publicly support before I support them, YMCV.
I’ve never been to a rally… all I know is that I support the general concepts that they support. Have you been to one? Are your opinions based on anything other than what you think you know about them based on a few signs?
I’d also like to see some speakers criticize those signs and the like… I wouldn’t be surprised if they have and I wouldn’t be surprised that that kind of thing wouldn’t get reported.
Was the point of your post that I went to GQ to try to get some facts… what point would that be anyway?
Dio you’ve gone off the deep end.
I hope you can make it to the next anniversary of Tony Snow’s death so you can obtain a little happiness.
Heh, he’s off the deep end? Can you find a platform of the Tea Party besides, “democrats and Obama specifically are bad”? Keep in mind that there are several competing Tea Party groups, and they don’t like each other much either. There are at least three major groups that I know of, Tea Party Revolution, Tea Party Patriots, and Tea Party Express. And by major I mean within the Tea Party itself since the group isn’t that large. It’s estimated that the first event (the one on tax day last year) had 250,000 protester nation-wide. Or .08% of the population.
It’s worth noting that even the Teabaggers themselves think their movement contains astroturf elements.
To further the astroturf impressions here’s the article on a Fox News Producer rallying the crowd, in case you missed this story when it happened.
And just to help you out, here’s the most coherent summary of the Teabagger’s platform I could find. Yes, it’s from the Daily Show.
Please–attend a Teabagger rally & get back to us with your personal impressions. Until then, I’ll stick with Dio’s description–which matches what I’ve observed.
I have - admittedly, I was there to point and laugh, but still.
There were a few people there taking considered stands against excessive spending, gun control and the like. The vast majority - all but 30 or 40 out of 300 or 400 - were there protesting “the nigger president” or “because they took Jesus out of government” or because “they’re rounding up real Americans and sticking them in camps in the Dakotas”.