And I also stated why I felt this was the case.
Yes you could interpret that as my hypocrisy from the point of view of the person being criticized but then they would say that wouldn’t they to justify the rape of children which is easier than that person taking a good look at themselves and finding out some uncomfortable truths.
I understand the point you make Bear but it still reinforces my view that “its the law” is a refuge for the scoundrel and unquestioning.
My real concern is the effect that having to enforce laws that are, well laughable, does not engender respect in people who might otherwise support the police.
Selling crack is not a good analogy because there are victims and serious implications, it does not support your argument and drawing the parallel between Wal-Mart and age entry clubs is only worth it because it is so incongruously funny.
Maybe Wal-Mart would have lots of objections if the club started selling groceries.
Here we are discussing a victimless crime with cops caught up in the middle, possibly to bolster some right wing politicians law and order credentials.
Don’t tell me that this helps to enhance the esteem that the law is held in.
BTW is it true that in some states or counties some of your law enforcement directors are elected ?