Thank you, but I find my posting history to be an exception to this rule. Trust me.
Weeee, look at my post count!
Actually, it’s mostly just low because I’m still in school so I don’t have a lot of time to post, and I don’t usually have much to talk about here, being 15 years old. But when I do post, it’s usually some really big, well-thought-out post. For example, in that “unusual ‘facts’ about the English language” thread (I’m too lazy to find the URL and provide a link. Ironic, eh?) I spent at least half an hour looking up words and debunking the OP.
And, for the record, it is possible to post many posts quickly in succession and evade the 60-second limit, but I’m not going to say how.
quote:
Originally posted by Frankd6
Personally, I find that a low post count to membership time ratio indicates a high percentage of well thought out posts.
Bibble, bibble, bibble, bibble, bobbly bobbly bubb.Wibbly wobbly booble blum. Gnarf flum flooble blip. Nurg.
Believe me, we’re really just lazy.
Thanks Coldfire! That makes it better watching the second time around! 
casdave, it’s not often these boards make me laugh out loud (I guess I’m crotchety before my time). But you got me with that one, you really did.
And I can’t believe I just upped my count-to-time ratio to say that!