Seems like she’s learning that what works on Fox doesn’t work in real life. In real life, and more specifically in court, she now knows that she should vet information before presenting it to the judge, especially if it’s an attack.
I would think, at the very least, it would have been worth it for her to send the author an email and ask to be put in contact with the unnamed source so she can hear the info first hand and maybe verify that it’s, ya know, real.
Would the NY Post have purposely made this up and published it in hopes that she could use it in this manner?
That is certainly the case, but I doubt that either Habba or Trump are actually learning anything. When the usual tactics that Trump is so accustomed to and that work so well with the rubes don’t work in court, their standard explanation is that it’s all Biden’s doing. I don’t think they really believe that, but I do think that Trump genuinely believes that it’s “very unfair” that his tried-and-true tactics for some reason don’t work in a courtroom.
I think it refers to English she speak not so good.
The thing is that she is probably right to some extent. Her court room antics undoubtedly annoyed the judge and that may have made the judge less sympathetic to her arguments at least on a subconscious level. But I doubt that an appeal is going to be granted for self inflicted judicial animosity, and if we are lucky the response on this count by the appeals court should make for an entertaining read.
Yet again, the most deranged, detached-from-reality belief in Trumpland (including beliefs involving deepstate lizard people) continues to be the belief that Trump might actually pay you for something you did for him and not screw you over.
Not necessarily. It is not at all uncommon for the trial lawyer to not handle the appeal. It’s not even uncommon for trial lawyers not to handle appeals at all. Many appellate lawyers only handle appeals.
An appeal on this kind of basis is almost certain to fail, self inflicted or not. Judges can be quite hostile to one party without creating an appeal issue. (I’ve been there). If his decisions were within his discretion, his motivation is not really relevant.
What are you implying for the worst client ever, whose lawyers regularly end up disbarred or prosecuted, and never pays his legal bill, even before he takes on a 88 million dollar liability (and probably another 400 mil on top of that in the next couple of days) might have trouble finding s lawyer?
