So what?
Where’s the Tangent when you need him? 
It would have been *easier *to just go to the damn Moon already than to execute such an elaborate ruse, and keep such a massive program a complete secret for all this time.
Unless we are all actually in an elaborate simulation and really being used to power a giant computer complex by our waste body heat…
Stranger
Go to post #1 and read the part about space radiation.
What the fuck’s so bad about space radiation? Look what it did for The Fantastic Four!
The views you quote and cite about “space radiation” are incorrect and misleading. “Space radiation” is not even close to an insurmountable problem for manned space exploration.
That’s what they *want *you to think.
For those of us that don’t have a few dozen spare hours to go through each of your hundred-odd linked videos, which one addresses this issue?
Stranger
I’m sure it’s not the first time you’ve heard this, nor will it be the last:
You’re a fucking moron, Cosmored.
If by some miracle there happens to be a single person that you manage to convince with this horseshit then you should feel good about yourself because you’ve possibly found someone who is indeed a bigger idiot than even you.
Out of context quote from Dan Goldin in 1994 that states that without protection from cosmic radiation, mankind will never venture more than 250 miles from earth.
This CTer apparently took this to mean there was a “death radius” around earth, therefore an admission the Apollo astronauts couldn’t have made it out to the moon and survived.
Of course, it ignores the fact he’s talking long term exposure and not the short term exposure the astronauts received nor the fact we already know they faced enhanced cancer risk or the fact that elevated exposure to radiation is only so quickly fatal in cases of extremely high doses of radiation. Classic conspiracy theory drivel.
It’s just more of the stupid. The stupidity doesn’t even burn at this point. It’s just tiresome.
Obviously, the government is letting him say anti-government stuff since he knows the moon missions were faked. Once he spills the beans, they disappear him. :eek:
<Ralph Cramden>“To the moon, Cosmo!!!”</rc>
Sure, don’t you know how many people who “worked on the Apollo program” are dead already?
I’d love to see Cosmored explain all this to Buzz Aldrin.
'Cause Buzz, he flew in Korea, and shot down 2 MiGs. I don’t think he’d take much crap from a pinko.
Here I am, citizen. What may I help you with? Oh, I see the problem…
You don’t have to thank me.
Fans self and swoons.
Isn’t he great?
Brilliant! Thanks for sharing that nugget!
Yeah, it’s what you think it is.
And in Soviet Russia, info disagents you!
Sheesh, are you insane? That tiny little box in the top corner, wow, so easy to see - not.
Try this one:
It moves, it’s probably the flagpole settling into the staff with a little vibration. Simple. It could be the camera bloom, since the whole section seems to push out to the right in one movement. It’s not air, that’s just moronic. Air doesn’t work that way.
More moronic claims. Why would they a) use buoyant cables in the first place b) if it was an issue, you don’t think one of their speshul faking team would have noticed? The cable, like all wound steel would be stored onto a drum when manufactured. As the debunking a moron link says, it’s probably simple shape memory.
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/chinese-spacewalks-part-1.html
You don’t have a reply to this other than the writer of your own debunking blog is a shill/disinfo agent. Yeah, whatever.
One does need a braincell to see that there is no shimmering of light from currents and refraction - especially with all the lighting obvious in the scene. The most glaring, mind bogglingly obvious sign that it is not in water and in a vacuum is the totally unrestricted way the flag spins around. In water, no matter what speed you do it at, the flag folds back and billows from the liquid.
You are one messed up dude, you’ve been peddling this shit for so long it has addled your brain.
The best piece I read on this whole thing was very recent. The gist of it was that while we did (barely) have the technology to get men to the moon and back in 1969, we DID NOT have the technology capable of faking the moon landing.
In particular, the ability to capture that much unedited footage at high speed and play it back (to simulate their 1/5th gravity jumping around) for such a long uninterrupted broadcast was not possible with the film technology available at the time.
It was, in fact, easier to go to the moon than it would have been to fake it.