Not surprised. Troy’s strengths are considerable, but they’re not necessarily what Trump is looking for.
All right. It’s time for my big confession: My father grew up down the street from the Donald. My pop was a few years older, so they weren’t buddies, but he knew Donald and his folks. No, he doesn’t have any good stories. 
So that was merely a random bit of trivia in my life until I got hooked into watching this show. Like many (most?) New Yorkers, I disliked Donald Trump and his ventures. However, in watching The Apprentice, I have been forced to conclude that in many ways, the Donald is just like my pop. And since I’m very much like my pop, it turns out that I’m very much like the Donald. (And FWIW, there are many Georges and Carolyns among my folks’ friends. Yes, I’m lucky.)
Here are some traits we share:
–Low tolerance for bullshit.
–Straight, blunt, communcation style.
–Appreciation for people with zetz.*
–Tolerance for abrasive personalities.
–Not especially impressed with “good social skills” or charm.
I think Nick might well win this thing.
Here’s my impressions of the remaining candidates, in order of likelihood of winning (not necessarily the order that they will be eliminated):
Katrina: An inept dud. She’s out of there.
Troy: “Yeehaw!” “Shut up.” Troy is a back-slapper, and his interpersonal skills are great. That’s both good and bad–he seems like a bullshitter. He is a hard worker, and that’s good, but he’s not an idea man. I’d bet that Trump would be willing to hire him in a sales position, but not to run a company.
Kwame: Boooring. No zetz. No great ideas. I don’t think the “risk” he took by choosing Meghan’s art is the kind of risk that Trump appreciates. Trump gets outlandish ideas that he loves and finds a way to make them work. Sometimes he fails spectacularly. But it’s always with something he genuinely thought was a good idea. Kwame may win if the other contenders self-destruct, but it’s unlikely.
Bill: Shown better leadership and ideas than Kwame, but still hasn’t really distinguished himself. As the series goes on, he seems to be getting along with people less and less well. That doesn’t portend well for him in a long-term position. I’m impressed with his success with the Cigar-of-the-Month club, but it’s not like he came up with that great idea all by himself. He married a common business model with a big trend. That’s not a bad thing, but it’s not exactly Trumpian. He has a decent chance of winning.
Amy: Hard to say. She has shown over and over that she’s a good team player. To me, one of the marks of a good leader is being able to be a good follower too. Also, she’s very good at avoiding stupid arguments. She’s competent, but not necessarily inspired. Like Bill, has a decent chance of winning.
Nick: He’s the one Trump relates to. He’s the feisty one. He has big ideas and big screw-ups. He is a good leader because he’s not afraid to make decisions and because he uses his team members’ strengths wisely. He’s arrogant and over-confident, but those are faults that I think Trump can live with. His biggest mistake–not learning about his clients–is pretty major. But at least with Nick, you can tell him straight out that that attitude won’t fly, and he won’t dissolve into a teary speech about what a good person he is. He’s my bet for the winner, but he may screw up big and get the boot.
*Zetz is one of those Yiddish words that doesn’t translate too well. It means to have spunk, or a spark, or something. Heidi has zetz. Katrina has none.