The Bundys are at it again.

What the fuck are you talking about? Who are you referring to by “his wife”? You don’t even know who Shawna Cox is, do you? The article was last updated on February 17, and at that time included the amount Cox was asking for. Your reply to eschereal indicated you thought the actual date of the article was March 25, not February 17. You said nothing about a comment before.

See, jmf, this is why you’re a wanker. When someone points out that you made an error, instead of just acknowledging it and moving on, you double down and post more dumbassery. This is not the way to gain any respect on this board.

Who said anything about banning? It’s not against the rules to be a stupid cowardly homophobic dipshit (fortunately for you). All you are doing is put your own idiocy on display. And for someone whose life “doesn’t revolve about this place,” you seem to be getting very upset about what people say to you here.

The article isn’t from today, it’s from five weeks ago, moron.

Trump’s sock?

Nah, Trump is more creative in his blather. jmf is just pathetic.

Goodness, no, it is fun slapping you around, why would you be banned?

For being the most uptight Dead Head in history.

I felt this way too.

Brandon Curtiss, leader of the 3% of Idaho militia, turns out to be habitually bankrupt and habitually ripping people off.

He’s not stupid. He’s following a Sov Cit like routine by forming legitimate businesses, taking out massive debt, not paying taxes (no evidence here yet but I bet he’s behind there as well), filing delay after delay in court cases, then the bankruptcy to further muddle things. Rinse, lather, repeat.
*
Well he probably is stupid but he has a plan.*

Not stupid, just vile.

Ripping off fellow citizens isn’t part of Sov Cit philosophy as such is it?

I mean I’m sure plenty of them do it because they tend to be entitled assholes, but it’s not justified by their anti government thinking is it?

There have been cases of Sov Cits occupying homes while owners are on vacation and refusing to vacate, claiming squatter rights.

Wow, do you have a cite? I would love to read that!

Never mind, found some:

Link 1.
Link 2.

On Edit. Jeez. I have never owned a gun, but if I ran into these guys I would probably go by one so I could shoot them.

Same case.
Here’s a group in Ga.

I wonder if they’d pull that stunt in one of the “stand your ground” jurisdictions.

Which of them would be entitled to stand their ground? The squatters in the house or the homeowner outside :confused:

It’s simple: due to a) the (former) homeowners’ leaving the property unoccupied for 47.2357628 consecutive hours, and b) the (former) squatters having posted a Sumptuary Writ of Adverse Occupancy Haggersmaggle, the (former) squatters are the (new) homeowners. So they are the ones entitled to stand their ground.

(Which makes every bit as much sense as many of the SovCit “legal” arguments I’ve come across.)

Although nowhere near as convoluted and peppered with CAPITAL LETTERS and what looks like someone cut up a law dictionary and picked random words out of a hat.

Thanks for stating it so simply. I knew there had to be a clear answer out there somewhere.

A recent sovereign squatting in New Orleans. The stupidity is not limited by racial boundries.