The issue of Bush’s National Guard service first received attention in 2000. During that time no proof of wrongdoing occured, and the matter sunk below the surface until…
the next election where it could be revived for political purpose.
I have read threads indicating there is damning evidence of wrongdoing.
I think that after four years of investigation it is reasonable of me to ask:
What exactly is Bush being accused of, and where is the proof?
I think it was reasonable to give Bush one year to find WMDs in a war torn country.
After four years I would expect those who are willing to make accusations against Bush’s Guard service to have a firm case, defining the accusation and demonstrating guilt.
If such a case is extant I would like to hear it. If such a case is not, I conclude that it is simply accusation for political value, and the worst form of irresponsible derogatory muckraking.