Not if they’re adults (or an adult by our rules) captured by an evil genius who descides to split them in a sawmill!
If you don’t write a story about that, I might.
Go nuts! It turns out I’m incapable of writing stories longer than one sentence.
This is the celebrity death pool so conjoined twins only count when the celebrity one of the two dies. Then they only count as one.
What if it’s only like a second set of legs, but they named it anyway?
My official ruling is that the second would be the celebrity through acquiring fame for lugging around a connected corpse.
I think I love you based on just that post. 
What if one of the Kennedy clan gave birth to conjoined twins?
Just by the way, over here is a list of (someone’s) 100 most likely to keel over in 2009. Some good guesses, some not-so-much.
http://www.cinemablend.com/celebrity/The-100-Most-Likely-People-To-Die-In-2009-14401.html
Speaking of which, do you get points every time an Immortal dies, or only when they get decapitated?
The “most likely” label seems odd when the list has people in their mid-seventies rated as only 2% likely to shuffle off.
If they get back up after the autopsy, you don’t get points.
Yup. Movement during the autopsy doesn’t count, it could just be reflex twitching of some sort.
I was going to keep picking Dracula every year - he’s always getting staked and then coming back. But then I realized he’s 577 years old - I’d be losing points every time.
Points don’t go negative, but it does raise the question of how many times you could count him in one year for the “Quantity not Quality” award.
I say I’m going to name a fictional vampire on my list and it’s the math you have issue with?
Well, it does also break 3 of the 6 rules as to what constitutes a celebrity, but I could let that slide.
What, are you new here or something? 
In that case, go with Mickey Rourke.
No one remembers these two?