So - apparently both the recent earthquake and Irene were caused bydeficit spending:
[QUOTE=Michelle Bachmann]
I don’t know how much God has to do to get the attention of the politicians. We’ve had an earthquake; we’ve had a hurricane. He said, ‘Are you going to start listening to me here?’ Listen to the American people because the American people are roaring right now. They know government is on a morbid obesity diet and we’ve got to rein in the spending.
[/QUOTE]
But apparently she was joking. (Or, more likely, her handlers are scrambling after people started wondering what God was telling us when Katrina blew through.)
Let’s assume she was really joking and not just backpedaling furiously. Would this be an example of a real life Poe’s Law? Once you’ve said enough outrageous things, no one can tell whether you mean it anymore.
Even if she was joking (which she totally wasn’t), why is a storm that killed 21 people something to joke about? If it was a joke, I don’t get it. “Ha ha, God killed 21 innocent people because he wants billionaires to pay less taxes, ha ha.” Where’s the funny?
Actually, according to most of the polls, the vast majority are telling Congress to raise taxes. So by Bachmann logic, the earthquake/hurricane combo must be the Tea Party’s fault for not listening.
Last night, after the debate, Bachmann said that the HPV vaccine caused mental retardation, based on a singular claim made by a supporter (name unknown, so Crazy-Eyes said). She’s not backing down on it either, as this mornings Today show appearance showed:
My conclusion is that people who who consider voting for Bachmann are probably mentally retarded themselves, although as far as I know it’s not hereditary…
She is backpedaling a bit now, not surprisingly, and claiming that all she did was relate what someone had told her (as if sharing unproven anecdotes were proof of anything).
What’s bugging me more now is what she told Jay Leno in regard to his question about her objections to gay marriage:
BACHMANN: Well, because the family is foundational, and marriage between a man and a woman has been what the law has been for years and years.
I don’t see how the above is an argument that makes any sense. There are all kinds of families and foundations, and many kinds of laws have either been repealed or changed over the years.