What’s nothing new is Opal taking yet another opportunity to bitch at me when it’s not warranted. What I said and what you & Bippy appear to be pretending I said are two different things. What I said is what I posted.
I just got an e-mail from Bippy (who, thanks to that e-mail is now blocked from sending me e-mail).
FTR: I said to the OP:
That’s not an attack, unless you are extremely ultra-sensitive–lieu doesn’t seem to be ultra-sensitive. It’s not an attack–opinion. Heck, in my life, I’ve screwed up but good before and the authorities have let me know about it. I bet everyone, at some time, has done something they could’ve gotten into serious trouble for (or even did get into serious trouble for).
The OP’s comment about me not wanting to defend my family were unwarranted & it appears lieu realizes that {I checked the top of page 3 & the middle of page 2 and see what lieu & I had to say to each other.} I also admit that, given the same circumstances, I’d probably let the the situation handle me, so to speak. I think I would also realize that I’d be in trouble after it was all said and done. & that the trouble was something I’d gotten myself into. lieu certainly realizes it (look at the entirety of his postings in this thread) & I think that takes a big man (real machismo) to buck up to that and not just gripe that he’s being tried for what’s a criminal act (come to think of it, I have no idea if it’s a felony or a misdemeanor)
Again FTR: What I think the court should do: find him guilty & hold sentence in abeyance for a stated time. After stated time, expunge provided he meets the terms of the probationary period (which he will do, & there’s absolutely no doubt in my mind as to that). And this opinion of mine is based on what lieu posted, what I consider mitigating factors (the dude next-door), and lieu’s obviously being a stellar member of his community (there is no sarcasm there). The court should also instruct the next-door neighbour to cease & desist from harassing the community–I guess a restraining order could be issued against him?–and if he violates that court order, the loon’s the one in serious trouble! Oh, instead of finding him guilty on the spot, the court (if the local laws permit it) could just hold the verdict in abeyance until the probationary period’s over. That way, it’ll be like it all never happened.
I’m not interested in Opal’s opinion of this (or anything else for that matter).
On preview, I decided that I am interested in Bippy’s opinion of that solution.
I am definitely interested in what lieu thinks of my suggestion as to what the court should do. What do you think, lieu? Especially about the holding the verdict in abeyance.