How, precisely, do you think Meeko knows you’re town?
And how, precisely, do you know that voting mahaloth would be a good thing?
peeker, you’re claiming to know things that regular Town players wouldn’t know. One way to know things is to be Scum, and unless you give me reason to assume otherwise, that’s what I think you are.
I don’t know, Chronos. Peeker put his very first vote on me for no reason. He’d been in the game just a short time and was pissed that I told Meeko that Ped could be trusted for rule explanation.
He said that Ped is always suspect and voted for me then.
Roles had not even been assigned and the game had not begun. He then unvoted me and voted others, then tried to split his vote into quarters.
He’s just playing illogical. Why his vote is on me is beyond anyone.
It is what it is.
Technically his vote is NOT on me, as you CAN’T vote at Night, right?
Stop this or, fellow mason or not, I’ll vote you for making the game more unplayable. Some of us here actually know how to play mafia and want to play mafia. We don’t want to play around with peek and meek dicks. So stop it already.
Here it is in all its glory, post 1220. Not to be confused with post 1244, where peeker* again* votes for Mahaloth, having briefly voted for ed in the interim. I can accept these as jokey votes made as he was catching up and not intended to be in force at the end of the Day, but why his vote is (kind of) currently on you is indeed beyond, at least, me.
Peeker has not answered my question about soft claiming that he knows Mahaloth better than we do.
He is ignoring the question.
Why is he ignoring the chance to claim?
1.He is scum, and is not going to claim, because it would mean an easy lynch.
2.He is vanilla townie, but he is lying. not a good move on his part, given the towns current perception of him.
**The fact remains, if he does not successfully claim a town power role, he IS being anti town.
**
He might not want to claim because it would leave him vulnerable to a NK. But, then again, I am pretty sure the town would have taken actions, if he was as Pro Town as he wants to be.
All I know, is that if Mahaloth or I don’t make it till tommorow, I know who I would have voted for.
But at that point, it would be on Peeker to prove that he is Town, outside of what I just handed him.
If he can do that, then great, it would be virtually the same as him supporting his soft claim. No real loss or gain here, just a different road to the same outcome.
Yet, if he also chooses not to, or indeed CAN’T prove a new option here, then we must look at him even closer.
Much like Paul the first before him, I feel that Peeker has dug a hole here. If he is Town, there should be a way for him to remain alive. More delay equals more of a grave for him.
Noob quesiton:
Would peeker be this … of a hinderance to the game if he was a power role?
I am just saying, I am close to an open and shut case here on peeker. Need the smoking gun.
Anyone else want to jump in here, and help?
I can understand why you would not want to help me at night.
Again, you would know who I would vote for, If it comes to it, that I can’t, for any reason.
I suppose there is the third possibility, that he has some weird nonstandard role (always a very real possibility in a pedescribe game) that actually is more helpful to Town if softclaimed than if explicitly claimed. But if that is the case, he needs to say so and try to convince us of it, which I think would be a hell of an uphill battle at this point.
And as I said earlier, if he is Town, he has already told the scum all they need to know, and he is very open to a NK attempt. Before he told us he was a power role, he had a good pro-Town motive for not doing so – avoiding the NK. But now that he has, in effect, told us (and Them) that, it is unlikely that there is any pro-Town motive for not giving us all the details.
What really REALLY baffles me, is that Special Ed automatically assumed I was speaking gibberish. Did it never occur to him, that I was speaking in a code? Has he no idea what a cypher is? Are we at a place now, where everyone else is stupid, if they are not as stupid as I am?
**
Why is he in a place, where he considers me being stupid, before him?** :eek:
Something is not right there, but in those situations, I think the party not knowing the issue at hand, will always assume that they are smarter.