The face of SDMB w free posting

How I lllllove it when the libs do their act of double-speak, turning the victim into the aggressor, defining reactions as talk-likitations and directives as what to say, etc., etc., etc…

It just proves the Fascism of the Left, not less, The Golden Thread of my thread.

And the cheap shots of lack of this and lack of that, and the below the belt belittling hits, oh man, even you, after reading again, and carefully, what you say, have to admit that substance is not your forte. Nope.

OTO hand snorte is what it is causing. zzzzzzzzzzzzzz, zzzzzzzzzz

My posts words generators? Huh! If you’re unable to follow, just say so and I’ll reduce them to the lowest common denominator, no problem. I’ll empathize w the weak, what can I do. Brains, that is.

Jonah Goldberg not a great thinker? You gotta be kidding or unable to reach his heights, or worse, display plain and simple demagoguery and ‘don’t confuse me w facts’ attitude of the bewildered non-thinker.

But hey, this is zakely why I say what I say, to show you what a non-starter you all are. Libs, that is.

Not one of you dealt directly w what I said, one! If he did, he did so obliquely and indirectly, by attacking ad-hominem and unwarranted the truths in my posts.

So let’s start from the beginning, again, for the weak ones:

Political Correctness - BAD=HYPOCRISY
Law Enforcement as Profiling - BAD=ANARCHY,
Same-Sex Marriage - BAD=SOCIETY DESTRUCTION and PUBLIC DEPRAVITY,
Leaving Iraq Now - VERY BAD=COWARD and STUPID,
English Not First Language - BAD=WHOLESALE OF OWN CULTURE FOR THAT OF THE OTHER,
Not Denouncing Islamo Fascism - BAD=COLLABORATION W THE ENEMY,
Anti-Zionism - STUPID=ANTI-NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENTS
and so on and so forth, till the whole list of stupid, blind, digging-own-grave liberal notions is exausted. Feel free to add, Foie Gras, don’t be shy.

And don’t complain, now, it’s the Pit here, so there.

Didn’t you answer a question someone asked about same-sex marriage?

I guess “liar” would be an ad hominem, so I’ll take pains to point out that your lying has no bearing on the truth or otherwise of the ideas you espouse. I point out also that I denounced communism, which you then proceeded to fail to denounce yourself, thereby making yourself, by your own logic, a collaborationist.

Again, I should point out that I am attacking you as a face for your ideals, not those ideals themselves, which have their merits entirely seperate from your impressively hamfisted and smug portrayal of them, Comrade.

Ooo, he’s breaking out the capitals now. I’m persuaded. What about you guys?

Doesn’t his Smell get there first? Can a Smell also type?

His Smell is actually busy watching reruns of The Daily Show and nodding in agreement.

Not to mention that he has now set himself up as ‘the VICTIM’. I think that means we should feel sorry for him.

Oh!

Poor danbar! Are those meanies on the internet not taking you seriously? Have you tried spelling words correctly?

There are a lot of “small l” libertarians, it’s just that most of them are Republicans (and some are Democrats because they focus on different aspects of the issues) because with the way our electoral system is set up, the Libertarian party has no chance of winning a major election unless the candidate is previously well-known.

And by the way, I’m a conservative-leaning libertarian, and I think that danbar is an incoherent nut.

I still think he’s Tokie.

Earth Has FOUR CORNER.

You Are EDUCATED STUPID & Evil.

Why something rather than nothing?

And it’s in all caps, so we know it’s true.

Political Correctness is simply a phrase used by troglodytes to complain when they are told to stop being rude in public. (There have actually been a very few instances where there have been legitimate complaints against various forms of “PC,” (typically on college campuses), but the majority of whines against PC are nothing more than crude people whining that they are not sufficiently free to be rude.)

Law Enforcement as Profiling does not even make sense. Profiling as a tool of law enforcement can be effective if it is sufficiently developed and sufficiently rigorously implemented. This would mean that it would include psychological profiles of the potential suspects that are matched against behavior. When it is simply a matter of harrassing people based on skin color (which is, by far, its most prevalent implementation), it is worse than useless as it does not prevent crime while it does impinge of the rights of persons and causes certain communities to withdraw from supporting the police, correctly perceiving the police as the “enemy.”

Same Sex Marriage is no threat to society. No one who has ever made the opposite claim has provided any argument beyond “it’s icky and I don’t like it.”

Leaving Iraq now may or may not be a good idea. Depending on how it is implemented, it may reesult in good or bad events. It is too important a decision to be decided by the bumper sticker rhetoric that you enjoy and it is not, regardless, “cowardly.”

“English Not First Language” is another meaningless phrase. Are you saying that we should deport a huge number of citizens of New Mexico for speaking the language that they have grown up with for the 96 years that they have lived in a U.S. state with a constitution that recognizes two official languages? Are you saying that we should have turned Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi, Igor Sikorsky, Alexander Kartvelli, Tsung-Dao Lee, Chien-Shiung Wu, Vladimir Nabokov, Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, and others away at the borders because their “original language” was not English? Bumper sticker phrases are a stupid way to debate and bumper sticker phrases that do not even make sense indicate the intelligence of the author pretty clearly.

Not Denouncing Islamo Fascism. I denounce the word Islamo-Fascism, although I doubt that that is what you intended. It is a made-up meaningless word that attempts to link a word with evil associations (Fascism) to Islam. None of the actual Wahabbists or other Fundamentalist Islamic advocates of terror actually embrace a philosophy that resembles Fascism in any way, so the phrase is inherently stupid. (Of course, I note that you also like to pretend that Fascism, itself, if a “leftist” ideology, and that sort of nonsense simply displays your beliefs as simplistic bi-polar cant.)

Anti-Zionism - STUPID=ANTI-NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENTS. This is a debatable point. Certainly, Zionism from its origins to the middle of the 20th century would be best characterized as a nationalist liberation movement. (That would not absolve it from every criticism, but it would be a fair depiction.) Since the middle of the 20th century, however, (and particularly beginning in 1967), it has taken on other elements that are not nearly so noble and it is open to criticism (not necessarily outright condemnation), on a number of levels.

= = =

Now, I have directly dealt with your simplistic nonsense, demonstrating that you embrace stupid phrases rather than actual thought to present your beliefs–beliefs you appear to have accepted without actually understanding what they mean (or realizing that they have no meaning). I have even taken thje time to note that there are nuances in your positions that may have merit (although you have not demonstrated that you are capable of understanding them). Satisfied? I think you can go home to your bridge, now.

17 year old spotty virgins with no friends.

Let’s be realistic here. He’s more likely to be a 47 year old spotty virgin with no friends.

how easy to be a demagogue, and you prove it.

…has four cornerS…

ad hominem, ad hominem, you Lib Fascists, ad hominem.

Incoherent? Moi? Huh! Now if what I say is incoherent, then rhetoric and logic and dictionaries should be revised.
But you already have a revised dictionary in your lap, as befitting Leftist double-speak and reversal of terms and norms from what is natural and logical to a social engineering stand -
“Change it b/c this is how I see it and therefore how I want it”, the Leftist trend of late.

What is public depravity and where can I go to see some?

LoboTom, in my generosity, I wish you the no. of women I have and I wish you the no. of friends I have. Believe me, you won’t know what to do w so many.
I also wish you my looks. You’ll be proud to look in the mirror. You’ll be late to work staring at yourself so long while shaving.

…and again, ad hominem, you little Lib freak, ad hominem is and can be your only tool, having none of any good arguments at your side.

Ooooh, I’m having a blast here. Bring it on, bring it on. Let’s kindle the unbalanced debate between the coherent voice of reason and the yearned artificial face of a Libed humankind.

I’m confused by this line. (Not that I’m really reading the rest of what he’s “writing”, but the capitals stand out when skimming past.) Anyone care to explain it and its connection to liberalism? As a liberal myself, I really should know all of my positions.

Public depravity is piling your shit on the pavement, topping it w whipped cream and a cherry, and asking for public respect for it.

And you don’t have to go far to have some, just read your own post and you had helped yourself w a generous portion of it, b/c asking such a q amounts to a full display of it.