Oh dear. That does seem rather kinky for the average same sex couple.
Risha, this is why you all don’t comprehend b/c you don’t read, but I’ll explain it to you.
Zionism is the liberation movement of the Jewish Nation. To dismiss, as is so fashionable now b/c of the Pal whining and sand thrown in the eyes of the public, is essentially the dismissal of all the other similar movements.
Jews never left Israel, it is the Arabs who came and occupied the land and now cry crocodile tears when asked to leave by the lawful landlord, the Jews.
So there’s a huge confusion and reversal of roles between the returning Jews and the ones in Israel from the earliest times and the occupiers of the land, the Arabs.
Got it? Now what’s your next question. I’m willing to oblige.
So you don’t agree w the definition, Risha, right? I see. Would you care to offer another? Or maybe to refute it? Coherently, maybe? Logically, maybe?
Anyone who thinks the Dope was no good before the membership fees needs to re-read the “is that a leg” thread about funny things said during sex. That was a damn funny thread.
Personally I notice a severe lack of trolls as being the main side effect from the fees. Plus now we’re much more touchy-feely, happy-clappy, and all singing from the same hymn sheet because we’ve kept most of the crazies out.*
- this thread excepted. YMMV. IMHO. etc. etc. etc.
I miss the crazies and trolls, they were entertaining and there was so much more obvious ignorance to fight…often expressed in whacky [SIZE=7]sizes, colours, “special” spelling and L33t sp33k[/SIZE]
Damn, haven’t you run out of coke yet?
Oh the irony. It burns, it burns …
Wouldn’t this apply to you?
Oooh, ooh, I get it-- it’s a rebus. Lesse now, same-sex marriage minus bad equals society destruction, add in the pyramid with an eye on top, take away the p, factor in the illuminati conspiracy from the $1 bill, divide by the amount of times Tom Jefferson fucked his slaves, carry the 2, and it comes out toooo… GWB is a pregnant trans woman who slept with the same sheep right after Hal did? And it’s now pregnant with both of their fraternal twin love children?
Jeez, I didn’t expect that one. Thanks dan! I never would have guessed without your help.
Man, wishing such a horrible fate on tomndebb is harsh, even by Pit standards. Isn’t wishing that someone else had your life, sad as it must be, awfully close to breaking the “not wishing death on another poster” rule?
OK, would anyone who is NOT the-troll-who-can’t-speak-English care to explain the Anti-Zionism thing? Is he trying to say that liberals are against Israel and/or are anti-semitic? Because that seems to make even less then the rest of it. 
Tomndeb, now w you I’m willing to debate. You earned my respect.
Let’s tackle the simplistic nonsense of mine that you mention in such a nonchalant manner.
Of course, re all of the culture related themes, I am an avowed ethnocentrist, but NOT on the expense of other ethnicities. I respect them fully. it’s just that I want mine intact, that’s all. Yes, it is ethnocentristic, but I really don’t think that such a stand is bad, errr, wrong. And let’s not confuse it w Apartheid, not at all. Let all live in peace, but in Rome, be Roman, if you get my drift. In Mexico I’ll defer to Spanish, and so on.
My castle, my rules, ok? I don’t like diversity. Now, shoot me.
Political Correctness - No, sir, noooooooooo. IT IS an evil trend, and the “undocumented” vs “illegal” will suffice, for you at least, I’m sure, to exemplify it.
For starters, read this: http://www.lewrockwell.com/yates/yates24.html
Same-sex marriage? Unnatural. Period. The sun rises every day? This is natural as is a man ‘sexing’ a woman and marrying a woman. Moreover, from age 3 to 6, a child needs the opposite gender for self-identification. Unless you care to deny basic psychology, this is the accepted wisdom in the matter. This covers homosexual couples’ defiant act of child adoption.
Islamo Fascism - Fascism is defined mostly as open display of power, for lack of substance. Not fro nothing its namesake - fascia.
In the case of Islam, it couples totalitarianism of the worst kind, the religious one, making an open and defiant, in your face type of Fascism: I’m holier than thou and I’m telling you when and how to breathe.
Zionism - You’re right, from '67 it’s tinged w hues of nationalism, but look how this is the most benevolent type of such human tendency. As we talk, Olmert gave 5k work permits ignoring the security officials advices against it, for fear of terror infiltration. Not to mention frex, the ongoing fule supply to gaza when it’s known that in this moment Hamas is in posession of hunderds of thousands of fuel gallons used for military goals while the population suffers.
So much for simplistic nonsense.
Bye, kids! Cook in your own liberal demogogic incoherent ad hominem stew.
I’ll bet he’ll treasure that forever, too. He’s probably printing that up for framing as we speak.
You are aware that the culture we (North Americans, setting aside America and Canada’s differences for a moment) live in was formed from a composite of several other cultures in the past?
The first part of your argument is completely irrational, and I fail to see how a child adopted by two gay or lesbian parents will not have any positive role models (or opportunities for self-identification) in the opposite sex whatsoever.
This isn’t inherent in Islam, it’s inherent in fundamentalism of any religious stripe.
I’m not touching Zionism because I admit I’m not fully equipped to make a judgment on the matter.
Ad hominem isn’t necessarily a fallacy when the person you call an asshole, *is *an asshole.
I for one share danbar’s concern that making the board free will open the floodgate to trolls, and appreciate his troll simulation to make us better prepared to deal with them
right? right?
A guest decrying the loss of board integrity if posters don’t have to pay is almost good enough for a laugh. Almost.
A complete non-answer. Asking what public depravity is, equates to displaying it? That makes no sense at all. Not that much else you’ve said does, but still.
You claimed, or at least appeared to claim, that to permit gay marriage somehow would result in displays of ‘public depravity’. Again, this makes no sense. I ask again, what do you personally beleive these displays would consist of? What would the marital status of these supposedly depraved persons have to do with the depravity supposedly on display?
He’s nearly a laugh but he’s really a cry.
This be made me chuckle just a little.
Polyester shirts? Unnatural. Period.
Public address systems? Unnatural. Period.
The printed word? Unnatural. Period.
Sanitary towels? Unnatural. Period.