The Fat vs Thin debate in America

Ok, johnny, here we go:

First things first:

“Look Nacho, if you’re going to jump in and revive a debate when it’s almost done and died out, then you have a responsibility to go back and read all of the posts and synthesize all of the arguments before you start spouting off.”

I will jump in a revive anything I please. It IS a public message board, and I can recall no rules about not joining in posts after they are a certain length. As far as I can see, nothing was decided. And I read the whole thing. I chose not to quote other posts because I wanted to make my own point. And spouting off is exactly what I do and will continue to do as long as people make ridiculous points and outlandish comments about fat people eating ho-hos.

“Finally, these are the Great Debat(e)s after all. If you cannot take criticism of your posts without interpretting it as a personal attack, then I would recommend that you either make better arguments or refrain from posting.”

Is this a warning? Because at no point did I feel anything was a personal attack toward me. I felt as though you were being rude and offensive toward anyone who has ever had a weight problem. If you are warning me because I am a newbie, rest assured, your trivial comments have no effect on me. I will continue to post as I please and I do not care if people criticize me. Whatever. And as for making better arguements, perhaps you should take your own advice.

Finally, I know they are Great Debates. I have been reading them without posting for months. But thank you for insulting my intelligence anyway, as it seems to be a sign of your own lacking in that department.

“What he got in return was an attempt to turn the thread into a self-help group full of people’s excuses and justifications for being fat, contrary to whatever the OP might have been asking.”

Weight is a sensitive issue. If you say fat people are fat because they are lazy cows, then they are going to give you reasons to indicate otherwise. That’s just common sense.

“But normal, healthy weights are much closer to to those of these actresses and singers than are some of the sizes that many people were volunteering elsewhere in this thread (5’3 220lbs?!?!?).”

PERSONAL ATTACK. As I said before, the person who weighs this amount knows it is excessive. That little reminder did not help anything. It was rude and cruel.

“It is not that hard to get out of bed in the morning and go exercise. It is not that hard to drink water instead of soda. It is not that hard to have a veggie sandwich at lunch instead of a hanburger. It is not that hard to eat raw vegetables as a snack instead of potato chips. No one is forcing anyone to do any of this and when people fall off of the wagon and start partaking in those habits that lead to weight gain, then it’s solely their own fault if their weight increases. A crisis in one’s personal life does not require a Big Mac for dinner.”

Yes it is and sometimes it does. You obviously have no concept of how hard it is to be overweight. I lost 60 lbs and I still want a ho ho now and then instead of veggies. I see you’ve decided to put your own expectations on everyone. Too bad they are impossible to fulfill.

“As this thread evolved, the general logic drifted away from the OP and became “I am fat, I have no control over it due to x/y/z, therefore it is unfair for anyone to point out that I am overweight.””

It is unfair because you are not contributing anything useful to that person’s lif - you are making them feel like shit. It is unfair because no one deserves to be teased, ridiculed, or embarassed over their weight.

Deal with it. Every overweight person in this thread has given reasons why they are overweight. If I asked you why you don’t look like Tom Cruise, you would have a reason, right? So if you ask someone how come they don’t look like Calista Flockhead, they will have a reason. It is not up to anyone, particularly YOU, to judge that reason. Accept it or walk away.

“Jesus H. Christ - I defend the OP and try and simply debate many of the mentally lazy claims made by people on the other side of the debate and now I’m getting accused of attacking people and judging people indiscriminately?”

Examples of your judging people:
1.“I mean also pisses me off to hear people bitch about their weight and then see the hoards of people -with big 'ole flabby bellys hanging over their waistbands - standing in Wendy’s line in the food court during lunch. Jeez, have a little pride and little common sense”
2.The ho-ho recliner comment - I can’t find it but I am sure we all remember it well.

You are judging people. You are saying that regardless of whatever - stress, medical problem, family death - every person should go to the gym and work out because:
a. it’s healthy.
b. men find it more attractive.
c. you don’t want to have sex with a fat girl.

I mean, that’s the idea I got.

"then I have every right to complain back when the whining and promising turns out to be nothing but whining and promising with little substance and call them on their empty promises. "

No you don’t. And if you ever had the nerve to do that to me, I would punch you. I definitely have the nerve to do that, trust me. I think you are using this thread as an excuse to air out your opinion on why fat people suck. But I doubt you care enough about anyone who is overweight to do anything other than complain. Not that we want you to anyway, but it goes both ways.

Others’ weight problems do not excuse your rudeness.

Quicksilver:

“Hollywood may be performing an unintentional public service by glamourizing the Twiggy look. I may be wrong about that.”

No, they are not. They are making fat people feel worse about their weight, which leads them to eat more.

No women who weighs 250 lbs is going to look at Calista Flockhead and say, “I wanna look like that, and it is attainable! Let’s go to the gym!” No, if she saw a 140 or a 160lb women, she might, but she knows she will never look like Calista and she loses hope.

I’m sure all the fat gals out there will agree with me, because I am speaking from experiance.

I hope you all can forgive my use of those quotes, I am ot sure how to do it the right way.

One more time:

OTHERS’ WEIGHT PROBLEMS DO NOT EXCUSE YOUR RUDENESS.

That was my ridiculous point and it was careless of me but I was getting hot under the collar at the time and hope to be one day forgiven for that remark. Don’t take it out on JohnnyHarvard.

a) gun control is a sensitive issue.
abortion is a sensitive issue.
religion is a sensitive issue.
politics is a sensitive issue.

Most issues debated on this board are sensitive to one degree or another. Are you suggesting fat people are more sinsitive to a topic about weight than pro-life people to a topic about abortion rights?

b) I certainly hope that somebody with an opposing view is going to give me cause to re-think/re-evaluate my original premis. I’m opinionated but not close minded. I do entertain interesting new ideas if they are well presented and thought out. So do most thinking individuals on this board.
By the way, welcome. I’ve not been here for long but have already learned many things.

a) Yes, it does hurt to get up and workout after a long period of relative inactivity. It’s supposed to. That’s your body’s way of telling you that you are exercising areas you have neglected to date. My brother-in-law runs in marathons. He’s been an excellent runner for many many year. Do you think there is ever a race when he does not think about quiting because it seems so impossible? Never.

My point is not to have overweight people entering marathons (sorry for being pedantic here), it’s to demonstrate that fitness is not a fad, fashionable and easy thing. It’s hard for everyone. It’s also good for everyone. You have to set your goals (small at first) and strive for them.

b)It’s okay to still crave ho-ho’s. It’s okay to sit in a lazy-boy recliner. The point is, if you do more of that than the fitness stuff then you are tipping the balance in favour of weight gain. No-one says you need to forgo all tasty things in life. Just learn to curb them so that they balance out in favour of a fitter lifestyle.

c) No-one here needs to live up to johnny’s, mine or anyone else’s expectations. Where did you get that notion?

d) Fitness is not impossible - but it’s not easy either. Think about it though… how many things in life are really worthwhile that are also easy?

People of all shapes and sizes have stress. Not all of them gain weight because of it (though I did). Obesity itself is the cause of many health problems… I’m sure we don’t need to list them again. Death in the family is very tragic and different people deal with it in different ways. I don’t know that it can be said with any great statistical accuracy how many obese people are obese because of a death in the family. Can we agree that that number is exceedingly small?

as for:
a. Yes. But we’ve agreed on that already and no-one argued that point so far.
b. Some men find heavy women attractive. Also, it’s been well established that women find fit men equally attractive. No?
c. Can’t speak for the types of women johnny wants to sleep with.

You may be correct. Perhaps they are not. I know that reflexive response to various stress very well. The desire to eat your troubles away. I’m suggesting, from first hand knowledge, that it’s neither healthy nor unbeatable. The sooner a person stops staying what they can’t do and starts saying what they can and will do the sooner positive changes can begin to occure. It seems trivial to have to say but every journey (long or short) begins with a single step.

I really hope you are wrong here. Besides to get to look like Calista you’ve got to work your way past 160 and 140 lbs. If you work you way down through 100lb you may find that you (and others :)) love you at 140. Or you may find you’ll want to drop another 20 or 30. Point is at 140 you have a choice. While 250 with arms thrown up in the air with resignation before you even started, you’ve never given yourself that chance.

**
[/QUOTE]

Sorry 'bout that last quote. That should not be there. I simply forgot to cut it out of the main body of my reply.

Obviously you did not read the thread because the hoho recliner comment wasn’t mine. Perhaps that’s why you couldn’t find it. Geez, I have never eaten a hoho in my life. I know it’s some kind of junk food, but I really don’t even know what a hoho is.

What is rude about participating in this debate? A debate needs more than one side, but you seem to be arguing that anyone who doesn’t agree with the overweight masses is being rude for voicing that disagreement and is disagreeing with them solely because they are fat. I have never once been rude to someone in this thread because they are fat and therefore deserve less respect. Disagreeing with someone about the cause of their weight problem is different than snickering and calling them rude names.

And with regards to being pissed off at fat people - I was a little unelegant with that particular comment. If you had read the thread, you would see that I clarified the comment to mean that to hear people constantly bitch about being fat and promising to lose weight and then going to Wendy’s is specifically what pisses me off in those situations. Which is pretty much how this thread started out. It’s now gotten a little more esoteric, but my original motivations remain true.

Let me repeat. I do not think fat people suck. I do not think it is any of my business whether or not they choose to be fat. I entered this debate because I didn’t think Quicksilver was getting a fair shake in the other replies to his topic. Personally, I think it is a hell of a lot healthier (and certainly more entertaining) for people to see attractive thin people on TV. We don’t see advertisements for cigarettes or hard liquor on TV specifically because the TV Gods and the Government believe that doing so promotes activities that are unhealthy and harmful to the viewer. Quicksilver was making the same analogy to being overweight and I think it’s a valid argument. It was a novel observation. It might not have been popular with some people, but it was novel nonetheless.

Some participants in this thread have said that the ultra-thin look is unhealthy as well, and that therefore, Courtney Cox et al are really not doing any kind of public service. I respectfully disagree - being overweight is a lot more unhealthy than being skinny - but that’s the whole point of the OP. A lot of people went past the OP to try and justify why they’re fat - others have tried to argue that healthy diets cause them to gain weight :confused: - and that’s where I decided to debate some of their claims.

Bullshit with a capital B. Reasoning like that is why many fat people stay fat. Call it cruel, but it’s the truth. Sometimes when I have a bad day in my life I am required to do cocaine and drive my car into a tree after drinking 6 glasses of whiskey… :wink:

Guess what? I love to eat red meat and cheese and butter and ice cream. Sometimes I go to a barbecue or I walk past McDonald’s at the right time in the afternoon and I crave a hamburger. It just smells so good. Sometimes I’m sitting in front of the television and I crave a pepperoni pizza. I love to scarf Lays potato chips. And sometimes I indulge myself and eat bad foods (well, everything but the red meat), but when I do, I recognize that my doing so was my own choice and my own decision and that any weight I gain or discomfort that might come from such indulgence is my own responsibility. I ate the pizza because I was craving pizza, not because my dog died and not because I didn’t have any other alternatives. Many of the other posters in this thread have been trying to argue otherwise and that specifically is where my entire side of the debate lies. I’ve been down that road, but now I know that making other choices makes me feel better in the long term.

And as far as my “obviously” not knowing how hard it is to lose weight. Again, read the freakin’ post. :mad: I’ve already explained that I do. This is why I feel as strongly as I do on the subject.

Let me repeat this again for the umpteenth time: I do not have anything against fat people and do not harbor any ill will towards them! I do however disagree with the notion that being fat is an uncontrollable part of life. I fought with it for a greater portion of my life until I realized that my weight was the one of the few things in my life that I can control 100%. Most fat people never seem to realize that simple fact - because when they do, and they’re serious about losing weight, they’re not fat much longer.

This was not a personal attack. Someone (I forget who, but there have been many) tried earlier in the thread to argue that being overweight is actually preferable to being thin. That is absolutely ridiculous and I was trying to point it out. How is it rude and cruel? For pointing out that someone is wrong?

How the hell am I being rude for pointing out that anyone in this thread is fat? Where did I ever call anyone out for being fat in the first place? I never did so. Please explain. Did my first post say “First of all, without knowing anything about any of you, you are all fat and therefore you suck in my opinion.” No. I did not say that. That would be rude. Everyone chimed in and started listing their vital statistics and used their stats as relevant fodder for the argument. Can I not use the same information in my argument? Is that really a fair debate?

No, I’m not threatening you. The comment above was made more as a disclaimer to just about everyone in this thread, but it’s also a problem that invasive just about everywhere today as I see it. Just because one disagrees with you does not mean that one is attacking you personally. No one here seemed to want to debate the OP at all - everyone wanted to give excuses and then shout “personal attack” when someone else disagrees with them on their own secondary topic. Pointing out why someone is fat, especially when they are the one’s who started the discussion and volunteered the information in the first place - in a forum specifically designed for such discussions no less - is not the same thing as calling them names or otherwise being mean to them.

I didn’t want to address this one because it was irrelevant to my point in the debate and is an obvious attempt to try and bait me into saying something that can be used later in an attack.

I will however, answer it now in a separate post as Quicksilver has already answered first.

a. Yes it is. No doubt about it.

b. Although there are some men out there who go for the heavy woman, most men do indeed find thin women to be more attractive. Someone has already made the comment that they don’t like the common sentiment “no fat chicks”. Well, deal with it. Liking thin women is a choice that many men make - it does not make them any less of a person regardless of whether or not you think they may be right or wrong for feeling that way. That is such a rude personal attack to think that men are all sleazy dogs because they have preferences for a body type you might disagree with. :wink:

c. Personally, I have been with both. I prefer thin women for a number of reasons that will not be discussed here. This sentiment is, however, irrelevant to my original argument and will not be discussed further. Thanks for asking, though. :smiley:

“What is rude about participating in this debate? A debate needs more than one side, but you seem to be arguing that anyone who doesn’t agree with the overweight masses is being rude for voicing that disagreement and is disagreeing with them solely because they are fat”

No…

  1. what is rude is your comments that completely embody every stereotype about fat people. The Wendi’s, the rolls of fat, the idea that all excuses are bs (even thyroid problems).
  2. I don’t care if you agree or not. Obviously you do not. I just think you need to understand where the fat people are coming from, instead of writing off everything they say as nonsense and telling them to buck up and get on the treadmill.
    3.I don’t think you are disagreeing with anyone due to size. I think it is because you are narrowminded.

“others have tried to argue that healthy diets cause them to gain weight - and that’s where I decided to debate some of their claims.”

Muscle weighs more than fat. When I started lifting weights last semester, I put on five pounds of muscle.

“I ate the pizza because I was craving pizza, not because my dog died and not because I didn’t have any other alternatives. Many of the other posters in this thread have been trying to argue otherwise and that specifically is where my entire side of the debate lies”

I’m happy you have learned this. I had to as well, but others have not, and there is nothing wrong with that.

“How the hell am I being rude for pointing out that anyone in this thread is fat? Where did I ever call anyone out for being fat in the first place? I never did so. Please explain. Did my first post say “First of all, without knowing anything about any of you, you are all fat and therefore you suck in my opinion.” No. I did not say that.”

No you didn’t, but I truly think the Wendi’s comment spoke for itself. That was one of the most offensive things I have ever read and it disgusted me that you see people that way. Would you also bitch and moan if you saw a fat person at the salad sensations counter? Or would you snicker?

“Just because one disagrees with you does not mean that one is attacking you personally. No one here seemed to want to debate the OP at all - everyone wanted to give excuses and then shout “personal attack” when someone else disagrees with them on their own secondary topic.”

Again, I don’t think you are attacking me. I am not attacking you either, I am just questioning your comments and ideas, which seem biased and rather simplistic.

I will try one more time to epxress myself on the Hollywodd/media idea - if anyone cares at this point.

I have many overweight friends, at least 10, who are struggling to lose weight. I asked the ones I saw today if they consider themselves to have low self-esteem. 6 our of 7 said yes.

If you were ugly, and you had to sit in class next to the most beautiful girl in the school, would you feel awful? I know I owuld - I would compare myself and see that I come up short. Or if I was I was in math class with a genuis who knew every anyswer, when I suck at math, I would feel dumb by comparison. I would feel uglier and dumber because I am forced to see the best, and I know I can never live up to that. Can’t change my face, will never understand Calculas.

Forcing fat people to see thin people everyday does the same thing. Contrary to what you guys seem to believe, this does not make them want to go out and exercise. It makes them lose hope.

Furthermore, look at the success of Rosie O’Donnell (whom you so lovinly compared to Cindy Crawford) and Oprah. I am familiar with Rosie’s efforts at losign weight since I watch the show whenever I can. She started the chub club and influenced a lot of people to lsoe weight WITH HER. Many did. When she put on weight, she went to new dieticians and have them on the show sharing their tips. She is losing weight, and I know I for one am inpsired.

Same with Oprah. I am not familiar with her weight loss, but I know that she lost quite a bit, had her dietician write a cookbook with low-fat recipes, and had doctors on her show helping viewers get serious about weight loss. I just checked her aol site, and sure enough, there is an entire network of people working together to lose weight. There are chub buddies and health chats and message boards.

This is what inspires people to lose weight. Not exceedingly thin actresses (Jennifer Anniston weights 105 lbs? please) perpetuating an idealized image with which no one can compare. Real people with healthy weights or women struggling in the same battle against fat many of us fight.

I also someone (I think Quicksilver) made a comment about how a thin girl is not going to look at a size 24 woman and desire thighs like that.

Of course not, so where’s the debate? Fat people on TV is not going to make thin people put on weight. It will just make fat people feel better about themselves.
Also, please stop insulting my intelligence by remarking that I do not read the thread. I read the whole thing htree times. Misquoting once is not a cardinal sin. I will not continue to debate if you continue to stoop so low.

Just wanted to clarify three things:

First, the comment about who Johnny wants to have sex with was misinterpreted, that’s my fault for being unclear and I apologize.

I was suggesting that your concern over “health” has more to do with what you want to see, your personal preferences, then it does with your being upset over the future of America. I am led to believe this by the “wendi’s comment,” which will go down in infamy as the rudest thing I have ever heard or read. It seems to me that you have some real anger toward fat people, contempt as well, and that you don’t care about health, but with what you like to look at.

I don’t care what the men I date look like. I am currently dating a man who at first glance was not very attractive. Then I got to know him and realized he is an awesome person. I have also known beautiful men who are assholes, and who I wrote off immediately. Appearence matters little to me as long as there is something to back it up, although you may find this hard to believe. It’s true. I sincerely believe that more men objectfy women than vice versa. I don’t mean that I don’t enjoy a nice butt when I see one, but I don’t expect everyone I know to look perfect, because very few of us actually do.

Also, I diagree with your comment that most men prefer thin girls. As I mentioned before, I know many overweight people who have wonderful boyfriends regardless of their weight. It happens, clearly more often than you think. As for me, I have had no complaints in the sex department, even when I weighed 190lbs and wore a size 16. Sex is not any better or different since I lost weight, it is better only because of the person I am having it with. And I have never gone more than a few weeks without dating someone. I have had several serious relationships with men who loved me and had no problem with my weight, not to mention about 10 less serious relationships (meaning that love was not involved) and my weight was never an issue. And the one time a had sex outside of a relationship, with a man I was friends with, it didn’t matter. He wanted me for me,and he said that he found the extra weight beautiful. That was a hell of a lot more reassuring than knowing that someone wants me because I am thin and wear a size 6.

I apologize if this was too personal, but I only have personal experiance with the sex topic.

Nacho -

You make excellent points about Rosie O’Donnell and Oprah. I personally don’t care for either personality, for reasons other than their respective weights, but if watching either one lose weight and emulating them causes someone to improve their lives and lose weight, then I’m all for it.
Now, back to our secondary debate:

Please demonstrate. Making observations of truth are not necessarily rude, especially in this context. Remember that the hoho comment wasn’t mine. Why don’t you go to Wendy’s or McDonald’s or Burger King or wherever and take a look at most of the people in line. This is not rude, nor is pointing out obvious truths about weight loss in general. Telling someone that making time to exercise should be a priority is not the same thing as saying “Get off the couch you fat lazy fuck!”

I also have never said that thyroid problems, or other legitimate medical conditions, are insufficient causes for being overweight, just that such problems are not nearly as prevalent as a lot of fat people want to think. Most overweight people - I would venture up to 90% - are in that condition solely because their net caloric intake is positive. Not for any other “uncontrollable” reason.

But isn’t that the whole point of the debate we’re having? There’s nothing wrong with people not choosing to get up and exercise. I’m not saying that everyone needs to get off of their ass and workout. I’m simply saying that people are incorrect in their assumption that they are unable to do so for reasons that are beyond their own personal control.

I am trying to engage in a debate. The entire point of my argument is that the “it’s beyond my control” excuse is pure bunk. Sure they’re coming from a hard place. I’m not debating that. But coming from a hard place does not change the fundamental biology of weight loss.

This is completely unecessary. Refer to the response to the previous quote.

Of course muscle weighs more than fat. That’s why people consistently underestimate my own weight by 30 to 40 pounds and why, according to all of the official guidelines, I am considered to be overweight. This however, is not the point of my comment. Please refer to Tracer’s ridiculous anecdote about why Weight Watchers caused him to gain weight. Of course, I shouldn’t need to provide a reference because you did read the thread before you posted the first time, after all.

That is the whole freaking point!!! Losing weight is simple! Thank you! It’s not a matter of emotional clutter. It’s not a matter of uncontrollable circumstance. It’s simply a matter of burning more calories than you consume.

So banning advertisements for smoking and liquor have no effect? [sarcasm] What about the poor smokers and drinkers who feel so bad about themselves? They can’t stop smoking and drinking, so why should we make them feel like outcasts by only presenting people who don’t smoke or drink? [/sarcasm]

Yes, I understand that fat people feel bad in our society. Yes, I know that the vast majority of fat people know that they are fat and that it’s not a good condition to be in. I am not debating the emotional viability of being fat or being reminded that one is fat. My intent is not to insult fat people. Now, for the umpteenth + 1 time, I am trying to debate the notion that losing weight is impossible for most fat people. I am not trying to debate whether or not fat people should feel good about their bodies or whether or not fat people feel like outcasts in society. If people interpret my posts that way, then I am sorry, but having a debate like this is completely ineffective if one always worries about insulting sensibilities every time he makes a post.

johnnyharvard wrote:

http://www.twinkies.com/static/hh_intro_02.html

Nacho4Sara wrote:

A woman after my own heart. sigh

“Now, for the umpteenth + 1 time, I am trying to debate the notion that losing weight is impossible for most fat people.”

I agree with you - for maybe 75% of the fat population, weight loss is possible. But it is not easy, and from personal experiance I can say that it is fucking difficult and hard and painful and it sucks for the first 4-10 months. For overweight people, losing the first fifty pounds is probably the hardest thing they will ever do (I refer to me aunt, who has lost 100 lbs in the last three years. She told me that people tell her childbirth is harder, but it’s not true, because childbirth eventually ends, while weight loss is constant.) AND people vary in the level of difficulty they have losing weight, meaning that for one person, an hour of exercise will have more effect than on others.
Society should not expect every person who is obese to make this change. No one should. It’s their decision and if they do not want to do it, then they should not have to. I have met maybe three overweight people in MY ENTIRE LIFE who gave me excuses such as the ones used as examples (ie Jimmy watches NYPD BLUE, Suzy goes to McDonald’s because it is closer.) I have heard people talk about thyroid problems, about finding time to exercise, about eating healthy food they hate. But never such obvious excuses. I sincerely believe that most people who are obese know this and have to reach a point where they decide to lose weight, as I did. Nor have I heard fat people bitch and moan about being fat while waiting in line at McDonald’s. Most fat people I know would rather not discuss it, period.

Your original point was very unclear, although I am willing to concede that I was partially blinded by the Wendi’s comment.

I still believe wholeheartedly that society has no need to juge fat people for being fat. It’s a personal choice, right up there with religion and homosexuality. No one has any right to argue that with a person.

Also, at my college, 50% of students smoke. 35% of these are women (I am reading this off of a broschure from the Health Center). Why do you think maybe 25% of that number smoke? To stay thin. It’s the number one reason, in black and white.

One more point: society may ban cigarette adds, but the people who smoked ten years ago still smoke. They quit because of health reasons, or because they find yellow teeth yucky, not because they are suddenly at a loss for advertisements. If fat people were banned from tv shows (I think, with the exception of a few shows, they have been already), people would still gain weight. It’s a lifestyle change, not a question of the number of fat people on TV.

And I really think you should retract the Wendi’s imagery.

Ohhhhhhh! I’ve seen those before. Those things are plenty tasty. I prefer regular twinkies, though. I don’t eat them very often, but they are pretty good. :slight_smile:

Here’s my question on this subject: Why is it that there are more overweight people per capita in the United States than any other country? If being overweight is not a result of our respective lifestyles, why isn’t the rest of the world overweight too? Please bear in mind that this is not meant as any kind of argument or put down to overweight people in America. I honestly want to know the answer to this question. If it’s a genetic thing, why do these overweight genes tend to congregate in the U.S.?

Wow, now I’m quoting myself… :confused:

I am really confused as to why you’re having such a hard time with this comment, Nacho. What is so bad about it? There are fat people in my office who bitch about how they want to lose weight, and then they go stand in line at the Wendy’s in the basement every day. I don’t get it. Why do people bitch about how they need to lose weight - after all, we’ve already been through rounds of how fat people already know that they’re fat :wink: - and then they go stand in line and eat some of the most fattening (and revolting) food on the planet? I honestly don’t get it. All I’m doing is pointing out an observation that I’ve made… What’s the big deal? There are some seriously fat people in Houston and many of them seem to congregate at Wendy’s for lunch. And they have big flabby bellies that strain against the tight cotton shirts that they wear tucked into pants worn about 4 inches too low. These bellies hang out and it’s really disgusting. And these are the men - most of the women are wearing extra tight blue jeans over about 24 inches of rear-end. For the most part, I don’t know any of these people’s names, and I certainly didn’t call anyone out by name in my comment. Honestly, what the hell is wrong with what I said? It’s an observation - why don’t you go look for yourself?

You know, I walked by a Wendy’s the other day and noticed a bunch of really poor people standing in line. They had obviously grown out of their clothes – their pants were too short and there was about 4 inches of hairy ankle showing – it was DISGUSTING. Then again, Wendy’s is one of the most revolting places I’ve ever been. Who can bear to eat that filth?

What kills me is that these are the same people who sit and gripe that they have no money. What a crock! If they studied more, they’d get better jobs. If they worked more, they’d make more money. If they ate less, they’d have more money left over for investment.

Now, I’m not saying it’s bad to be poor, just that it’s a CHOICE. Some people may be poor because they really can’t work, but I’m sure we can agree that this is not nearly as widespread a problem as poor people would have you believe. Sure, not everyone can be Bill Gates, but at least 90% of poor people could easily make as much money as me if they tried – they’ve CHOSEN to be poor.

Don’t jump all over me for this. I’m not criticizing any poor people. I’m just making an observation about those who complain about having no money when they’re sitting there buying fries. Hell, if they just cut back a little, ate just enough to remain above the starvation level, and consumed only ramen, they’d have plenty of money to do something about their situation.

In any case, what’s wrong with only letting rich people go to college? It seems to me that colleges are doing a service (in their own twisted and unintentional way) by encouraging people to be rich. Furthermore, I’m sure we can all agree that most men find rich women more attractive. Those who claim to prefer poor women probably just like to be in control.

So anyway, do what you want about your own financial situation. I’m not judging anyone. Just don’t complain to me because you’re poor and then refuse to change it. I was poor once and now I’m rich, so obviously it’s not as hard as you think.

Oh my goodness, I feel like I defending every person in America who isn’t a rich size 6. I don’t know if you were being sarcastic or not, but I hope so.

I think it is easy to write off people with any sort of problem - be it weight or poverty - as weak-minded and stupid. It’s not true. I see it as a way to make you feel better about yourself because you are not that way and not doing anything to change it.
I was very poor for the first 12 years of my life, until my mom remarried. My mom worked 16 hour days trying to make enough money to raise children and support my father’s drinking habit. I have so much respect for her because she never complained, she just did what she had to do.

I wore second hand clothes and it comforts me to know that wealthier people looked at my floods and ratty t-shirts and though, lazy bum. That’s really sweet.

Here’s a novel idea: empathy. Try understanding what it would be like to live in poverty (which you claim to have done, but I guess you have a different definition) and to have to wear second-hand clothes. Or what it would be like to walk into McDonald’s knowing everyone is saying, Look at the cow feeding her face, even though you were planning on buying a salad shaker.
I refer back to the time my mom told me that I could help the people I left behind or forget them. The latter choice is unacceptable to me, I thought out of common human decency, but again, I guess I am wrong.

Right now, I hope to get rich. I want to go back to my old neighborhood and build a shelter for abused women and children. If I won a million dollars tomorrow, I would donate it to that.

It makes me really sad to think that if I did that, and then went to McDonald’s to get a sandwich in ill-fitting pants, people would assume I was lazy and selfish because of my clothes.

Fact is, I know most of the people you are looking down at. They are my family, my friends for most of my childhood. And contrary to popular belief, they are not lazy or selfish. They are trying to do their best with little education and a lot of enthusiasm, usually trying to raise children and do laundry and fix dinner. They are not drug users or addicts. They are normal people who will never be on top no matter how hard they work.

The problem with colleges perpetuating the desire for wealth is that the people who go already have money. Sure, a lot of kids go on scholarship and grants, but I’d say 70% have parents who are paying for them and have relative economic comfort.And I don’t think colleges (mine at least)
teach you to get rich. It’s more about finding what makes you happy and what you can excel at.

I actually feel better for the innercity kid working at McDonald’s to support his family than the rich woman who looks down at him. At least he isn’t a self-righteous snob, and I bet he knows where his priorities lay.

But you’d probably assume he working to support his drug habit, right?

Umm… nacho… that was entirely sarcastic. I thought that with that many direct quotes, I didn’t need a smiley. :slight_smile:

johnnyharvard:

I believe that may have been me you’re referring to. My point was not that being overweight is healthier than being slightly underweight, it is not. My point was that the health hazards of being overweight are less than, and manifest themselves slower than being radically underweight - the kind of underweight that Callista Flockhart et al exemplify.

Quicksilver:

The difference is that the onscreen violence is fake. These actresses are really that thin, it’s no camera or CGI trick. It’s an unhealthy thing to present, because “if they can do it so can I” or “if they can do it so can YOU”. And, that kind of weight can be achieved by anyone, if they want to literally kill themselves to do it.

Vera

I am so glad you were beign sarcastic. That seriously made me want to cry! :slight_smile:

Sorry for the personal attack, I was feeling overwhelmed by the anger.

Sarah

Johnny, I think it was you who said this (it was a quote from a while ago…sheesh, I get sidetracked for a few days, and this thread takes on a new life!)

I was the one who mentioned that. They are bumper stickers that say that. That was the entire reason for bringing up the phrase “no fat chicks”.

Uh, I know this thread has gotten huge, but did your read the context of my comment about the “No Fat Chicks” bumper stickers? Or, my personal favorite, “Save a Whale, Harpoon a Fat Chick”? You know, no one has really commented on that.

I think those bumper stickers are just a hateful and appalling thing, but all you seemed to retain from my introducing the phrase “no fat chicks” to this thread was “Deal with it”. No, I don’t assume that you meant the cruel bumper stickers when you said “Deal with it”. But you obviously read my post mentioning the bumper stickers. And apparently nothing in it made an impression on you, other than “someone mentioned ‘no fat chicks’”. So I’d have to wonder if you really don’t fricking give a damn that the “fat chicks” out there see bumper stickers like this, and that obviously there is a market for men to buy these bumper stickers and display them on their cars.