[QUOTE=Gukumatz ]
Hell, for that much money, I’d fuck everyone.
[/QUOTE]
Man, for that kinda money I’d fuck everyone and their pet goats/sheep/etc.
Matter of fact the animals could fuck ME
Hell for $25 million pounds I’d fuck Ringo.
Gives the expression “Getting your leg over” a whole new perspective
[QUOTE=Cluricaun]
Hell for $25 million pounds I’d fuck Ringo.
[/QUOTE]
Ah, yes- the old Back Door Boogaloo.
[QUOTE=Cluricaun]
Hell for $25 million pounds I’d fuck Ringo.
[/QUOTE]
25 million dollarpounds is a lot of money. For that, I’d star in a televised gangbang with John, George, and Brian Epstein.
[QUOTE=mswas]
Heh, I’d fuck Heather Mills if she just took me out to a nice restaurant and bought me flowers. 
She’s a good looking woman.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but during coitus, would you take her leg off or leave it on?
[QUOTE=5-4-Fighting]
Yeah, but during coitus, would you take her leg off or leave it on?
[/QUOTE]
Off so I can caress the stump.
I think that 25 mill is small compensation for putting up with a egotistical glorified jingle writer. But that’s just one man’s opinion.
[QUOTE=chowder]
Man, for that kinda money I’d fuck everyone and their pet goats/sheep/etc.
Matter of fact the animals could fuck ME
[/QUOTE]
You northern boys would do that for air-miles.
[QUOTE=5-4-Fighting]
Yeah, but during coitus, would you take her leg off or leave it on?
[/QUOTE]
Not that I plan on banging Ms. Mills, but I’d leave it on in an effort to literally try to screw her leg off.
[QUOTE=LilShieste]
Calling her a hooker because of this is ridiculous, though.
What if she only receives $100? Does that just make her a really cheap hooker? What about any other divorce settlement, in which the woman (or even the man) receives some determined portion of the matrimonial assets?
[/quote]
If you marry for the money, whether in expected future alimony or in lifestyle, never sincerely intending to make the marriage work on the customary person-to-person basis, what’s the difference really?
Maybe so.
[QUOTE=LilShieste]
So… all wives are hookers?
[/QUOTE]
He’s only asking because now he’s concerned that he can’t afford me. I have nice teeth. 
(lass => lad) 
And the pirate metaphor is much more apt than the hooker one, IMO.
[QUOTE=ElvisL1ves]
If you marry for the money, whether in expected future alimony or in lifestyle, never sincerely intending to make the marriage work on the customary person-to-person basis, what’s the difference really?
[/quote]
The difference may be subtle, but it’s certainly there (see above). That is, it might make you a thief, but it wouldn’t make you a prostitute.
Has anyone seen the lid to my can o’ worms?
Something less to get in the way.
[QUOTE=LilShieste]
So… all wives are hookers?
[/QUOTE]
Some are slicers, but if they if keep their head down and follow through…
[QUOTE=Bosda Di’Chi of Tricor]
True, lass.
She’s not a hooker, by Billy Bones.
She’s a peg-legged Pirate, AARRRR!
And poor Paul is a silly old man, who thought he could recapture the days when he was the sexual fantasy of millions of teenyboppers.
She took advantage, & all the booty she could plunder.
Ar. 
[/QUOTE]
http://www.talklikeapirate.com/piratehome.html
How many doubloons, saucy wench? Prepare to be boarded!
[QUOTE=essell]
You northern boys would do that for air-miles.
[/QUOTE]
And you guys would do it for road miles
[QUOTE=5-4-Fighting]
Yeah, but during coitus, would you take her leg off or leave it on?
[/QUOTE]
If you leave it on, how are you supposed to get her drunk enough?
[QUOTE=Cluricaun]
Hell for $25 million pounds I’d fuck Ringo.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but what about Yoko?
[QUOTE=Billdo]
Yeah, but what about Yoko?
[/QUOTE]
Dunno. She might fuck Ringo for 25 million pounds.